Search results for 'Mária S. Kopp' (try it on Scholar)

11 found
Sort by:
  1. János M. Réthelyi & Mária S. Kopp (2004). Hierarchy Disruption: Women and Men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):305-307.score: 870.0
    The application of evolutionary perspectives to analyzing sex differences in aggressive behavior and dominance hierarchies has been found useful in multiple areas. We draw attention to the parallel of gender differences in the worsening health status of restructuring societies. Drastic socio-economic changes are interpreted as examples of hierarchy disruption, having differential psychological and behavioral impact on women and men, and leading to different changes in health status.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Nigel Cutland, Christoph Kessler, Ekkehard Kopp & David Ross (1988). On Cauchy's Notion of Infinitesimal. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):375-378.score: 360.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. S. Kopp (1963). Geschichte der Griechischen Literatur. Augustinianum 3 (1):203-203.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. S. Kopp (1963). Der Ordobegriff des jungen Augustinus. Augustinianum 3 (3):569-570.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. S. Kopp (1962). Pseudonymität im Altertum. Augustinianum 2 (2):410-411.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David R. Morrow, Robert E. Kopp & Michael Oppenheimer (2009). Toward Ethical Norms and Institutions for Climate Engineering Research. Environmental Research Letters 4.score: 120.0
    Climate engineering (CE), the intentional modification of the climate in order to reduce the effects of increasing greenhouse gas concentrations, is sometimes touted as a potential response to climate change. Increasing interest in the topic has led to proposals for empirical tests of hypothesized CE techniques, which raise serious ethical concerns. We propose three ethical guidelines for CE researchers, derived from the ethics literature on research with human and animal subjects, applicable in the event that CE research progresses beyond computer (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. A. Kolossa, T. Fingscheidt, K. Wessel & B. Kopp (2011). A Model-Based Approach to Trial-by-Trial P300 Amplitude Fluctuations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6:359-359.score: 120.0
    It has long been recognized that the amplitude of the P300 component of event–related brain potentials is sensitive to the degree to which eliciting stimuli are surprising to the observers (Donchin, 1981). While Squires et al. (1976) showed and modeled dependencies of P300 amplitudes from observed stimuli on various time scales, Mars et al. (2008) proposed a computational model keeping track of stimulus probabilities on a long–term time scale. We suggest here a computational model which integrates prior information with short–term, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David R. Morrow, Robert E. Kopp & Michael Oppenheimer (2013). Political Legitimacy in Decisions About Experiments in Solar Radiation Management. In William C. G. Burns & Andrew Strauss (eds.), Climate Change Geoengineering: Philosophical Perspectives, Legal Issues, and Governance Frameworks. Cambridge University Press.score: 120.0
    Some types of solar radiation management (SRM) research are ethically problematic because they expose persons, animals, and ecosystems to significant risks. In our earlier work, we argued for ethical norms for SRM research based on norms for biomedical research. Biomedical researchers may not conduct research on persons without their consent, but universal consent is impractical for SRM research. We argue that instead of requiring universal consent, ethical norms for SRM research require only political legitimacy in decision-making about global SRM trials. (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Florian Lange Bruno Kopp (2013). Electrophysiological Indicators of Surprise and Entropy in Dynamic Task-Switching Environments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 12.0
    This event-related brain potential (ERP) study aimed at bridging two hitherto widely separated domains of cognitive neuroscience. Specifically, we combined the analysis of cognitive control in a cued task-switching paradigm with the fundamental question of how uncertainty is encoded in the brain. Two functional models of P3 amplitude variation in cued task-switching paradigms were put to an empirical test: (1) According to the P3b surprise hypothesis, parietal P3b waveforms are related to surprise over switch cues. (2) According to the P3a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Thomas Junker (2007). Ernst Mayr (1904–2005) and the New Philosophy of Biology. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):1-17.score: 8.0
    p. 13: But if Mayr himself was an unconscious 'physicalist', why did he argue so forcefully against the machine theory of life? In part his dissatisfaction with this approach can be explained as a residue of earlier experiences. When he started to argue for the autonomy of biology in the early 1960s, the unique, emergent characteristics of organisms were ignored by the philosophy of science which was dominated by physics (Greene 1994; Hull 1994). In this situation Mayr not only criticised (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Claus Emmeche, Simo Koppe & Frederick Stjernfelt (1997). Explaining Emergence: Toward an Ontology of Levels. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (1):83-119.score: 4.0
    University of Copenhagen University of Copenhagen University of Copenhagen Blegdamsvej 17 Njalsgade 80 Njalsgade 80 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø DK 2300 Copenhagen S DK-2300 Copenhagen S Denmark.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation