9 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
M. A. van Rees [7]M. Agnès van Rees [2]
  1. M. A. Van Rees (2006). Strategic Maneuvering with Dissociation. Argumentation 20 (4):473-487.
    This paper explores the possibilities for strategic maneuvering of the argumentative technique that Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame/London, 1969) called dissociation. After an exploration of the general possibilities that dissociation may have for enhancing critical reasonableness and rhetorical effectiveness, the use of dissociation in the successive stages of a critical discussion is examined. For each stage, first, the dialectical moves that dissociation can be employed in are specified, then, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. M. A. van Rees (2003). Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussion. Argumentation 17 (4):465-479.
    In this article, after arguing that present approaches to improving problem-solving discussions for various reasons are not satisfactory, I turn to the pragma-dialectic approach to argumentative discourse to derive a normative framework that can serve as a point of departure to enhance the quality of problem-solving discussions. I then show how this approach can be used as analytical and evaluative instrument that can help the analyst to establish whether participants in actual practice act in a fashion that is in accord (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. M. A. Van Rees (2003). Within Pragma-Dialectics: Comments on Bonevac. Argumentation 17 (4):461-464.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. M. A. Van Rees (2001). Ralph H. Johnson (2000), Manifest Rationality. A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Argumentation 15 (2):231-237.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. M. A. van Rees (2001). The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussions. Argumentation 15 (4):457-470.
    In this article, the pragma-dialectical model of a critical discussion is demonstrated to provide a useful instrument for discovering causes of an unsatisfactory development of problem-solving discussions. First a sketch is given of the development of a problem-solving discussion which, in the opinion of the participants themselves, developed in an unsatisfactory fashion. Then it is argued that this development can be traced back to flaws in the execution of the stages of a critical discussion.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. M. A. van Rees (2000). Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-First Century'. Argumentation 14 (3):255-259.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. M. Agnès van Rees (1996). Accounting for Transformations in the Dialectical Reconstruction of Argumentative Discourse. In J. F. A. K. van Benthem (ed.), Logic and Argumentation. North-Holland. 89.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. M. A. van Rees (1995). Explaining and Arguing. The Social Arganization of Accounts. Argumentation 9:1-6.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. M. Agnes Van Rees (1995). Analysing and Evaluating Problem-Solving Discussions. Argumentation 9 (2):343-362.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation