15 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Maite Ezcurdia [13]M. Ezcurdia [2]
See also:
Profile: Maite Ezcurdia (Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico)
  1. Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.) (2013). The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press.
    The boundary between semantics and pragmatics has been important since the early twentieth century, but in the last twenty-five years it has become the central issue in the philosophy of language. This anthology collects classic philosophical papers on the topic, along with recent key contributions. It stresses not only the nature of the boundary, but also its importance for philosophy generally.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Maite Ezcurdia (2009). In Memoriam. Crítica 41 (122):135 - 136.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Maite Ezcurdia (2009). Motivating Moderate Contextualism. Manuscrito 32 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Maite Ezcurdia (2004). Actitudes pragmáticas y competéncia semántica. Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 36 (108):55-82.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Maite Ezcurdia (2004). Pragmatic Attitudes and Semantic Competence (Actitudes Pragmáticas y Competencia Semántica). Crítica 36 (108):55 - 82.
    In this paper I argue against the account Soames offers in Beyond Rigidity of the semantics and pragmatics of propositional attitude reports. I defend a particular constraint for identifying semantic content of phrases based on conditions for semantic competence, and argue that failure of substitutivity is an essential component of our competence conditions with propositional attitude predicates. Given that Soames's account makes no room for this, I conclude that he does not offer an adequate explanation of propositional attitude reports.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. R. Stanton, M. Ezcurdia & C. Viger (eds.) (2004). New Essays in Philosophy of Language and Mind, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 30. University of Calgary Press.
  7. Maite Ezcurdia (2003). Introducing Sense. Manuscrito 26 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Maite Ezcurdia (2002). Indexicals and Demonstratives. In Lynn Nadel (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Macmillan.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Maite Ezcurdia (2001). Thinking About Myself. In Andrew Brook & R. DeVidi (eds.), Self-Reference and Self-Awareness. John Benjamins.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Maite Ezcurdia (1998). The Concept-Conception Distinction. Philosophical Issues 9:187-192.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. M. Ezcurdia (1996). Dynamic and Coherent Thoughts. European Review of Philosophy 2.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Maite Ezcurdia (1996). Review: Contextos, creencias y anaforas. [REVIEW] Crítica 28 (83):97 - 129.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Maite Ezcurdia (1995). Las contrapartes incongruentes y el espacio absoluto. Dianoia: Anuario de Filosofía 41:107-124.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Maite Ezcurdia (1995). Modos de presentación y modos de determinación. Crítica 27 (80):57 - 96.
    In this paper I argue that, in order to make (T1) and (T2) compatible within a Fregean approach, we must reject the view that all modes of presentation are senses. (T1) There is a diversity of ways in which Venus may be presented to each subject, and which are associated with the name ‘Venus’. (T2) There is only one Fregean thought expressed by the sentence ‘Venus is a planet’. Modes of presentation are essentially psychological and have causal powers on minds. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Maite Ezcurdia & Olbeth Hansberg (1995). la experiencia. Volumen I: Sensaciones, Instituto de Investiga-ciones Filosóficas-UNAM, México, 2003, 356 pp. [REVIEW] Philosophy 75:477-496.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation