10 found
Sort by:
  1. M. J. Apthorp (2001). M. Carlisle, O. Levaniouk (Edd.): Nine Essays on Homer . Pp. Xxii + 241, Figs. Lanham, Etc.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999. Paper, £16.95. ISBN: 0-8476-9424-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (01):153-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. M. J. Apthorp (2001). Review. Nine Essays on Homer M. Carlisle, O. Levaniouk. The Classical Review 51 (1):153-154.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. M. J. Apthorp (1995). Dawe's Odyssey R. D. Dawe: The Odyssey: Translation and Analysis. Pp. 879. Lewes: The Book Guild, 1993. Cloth, £50. The Classical Review 45 (01):1-2.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. M. J. Apthorp (1995). The Odyssey Concordance. The Classical Review 45 (02):221-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. M. J. Apthorp (1995). The Odyssey Concordance J. R. Tebben: Concordantia Homerica, Pars I: Odyssea. A Computer Concordance to the Van Thiel Edition of Homer's Odyssey. (Alpha-Omega, Reihe A, CXLI.1.1/2.) 2 Vols: Volumen Primum, A–I, Pp. Viii + 691; Volumen Alterum, Κ-Ω, Pp. V + 722. Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York: Olms-Weidmann, 1994. Cased, DM 496. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (02):221-222.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. M. J. Apthorp (1993). A New Edition of the Odyssey. The Classical Review 43 (02):228-.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. M. J. Apthorp (1993). A New Edition of the Odyssey Helmut van Thiel: Homeri Odyssea. (Bibliotheca Weidmanniana, I.) Pp. Xxxiii + 338. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York: Georg Olms, 1991. DM 98 (Paper, DM 39.80). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (02):228-230.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. M. J. Apthorp (1992). Nochmals the Authenticity of Odyssey 10.475–9. Classical Quarterly 42 (01):270-.
    It is gratifying to see the authenticity of Od. 10.475–9 defended anew by the late, Professor Alfred Heubeck; in 1974 I put forward a rather similar defence of the lines myself. However, Heubeck's correct conclusion – that the passage is genuine – stands in startling contrast to some gross exaggerations, in both the Italian and the English versions of his work, about the extent of the manuscript evidence against the passage.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. M. J. Apthorp (1980). The Obstacles to Telemachus' Return. Classical Quarterly 30 (01):1-.
    If we divide up the action of the Odyssey into days,1 we find that we leaveTelemachus with Menelaus in Sparta on Day 6 and only return to him, still in Sparta, during the pre-dawn hours of Day 36 , although at 4. 593–9 he told Menelaus he did not want to stay long.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. M. J. Apthorp (1977). The Language of Odyssey 5.7–20. Classical Quarterly 27 (01):1-.
    The old Analytical view that the union between the Journey of Telemachus and the rest of the Odyssey is post-Homeric, superficial, and incompetently effected is nowadays widely rejected, and rightly so. However, although many defences cumulatively, I believe, successful–of the content of the second divine assembly have been put forward in recent years, no adequate answer has yet been given to the objections raised against the allegedly anomalous language of Athene's speech of 5.7–20.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation