4 found
Sort by:
  1. M. J. Zimmerman (2011). Partiality and Intrinsic Value. Mind 120 (478):447-483.
    The fitting-attitudes analysis of value, which states that something's being good consists in its being the fitting object of some pro-attitude, has recently been the focus of intense debate. Many objections have been levelled against this analysis. One objection to it concerns the ‘challenge from partiality’, according to which it can be fitting to display partiality toward objects of equal value. Several responses to the challenge have been proposed. This paper criticizes these and other responses and then offers a response (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. M. J. Zimmerman (2006). Risk, Rights, and Restitution. Philosophical Studies 128 (2):285 - 311.
    In “Imposing Risks,” Judith Thomson gives a case in which, by turning on her stove, she accidentally causes her neighbor’s death. She claims that both the following are true: (1) she ought not to have caused her neighbor’s death; (2) it was permissible for her to turn her stove on. In this paper it is argued that it cannot be that both (1) and (2) are true, that (2) is true, and that therefore (1) is false. How this is so (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. M. J. Zimmerman (2005). Defending the Concept of Intrinsic Value. In. In Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen & Michael J. Zimmerman (eds.), Recent Work on Intrinsic Value. Springer. 153--168.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. M. J. Zimmerman (2005). Intrinsic Value and Individual Worth. In. In Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen & Michael J. Zimmerman (eds.), Recent Work on Intrinsic Value. Springer. 191--205.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation