4 found
Sort by:
  1. G. E. M. Anscombe, I. A. Apperly, A. Avramides, J. Barresi, K. Bartsch, E. Bates, M. Bekoff, M. R. Bennett, J. Bermudez & P. Bernier (2007). Campos, JJ, 152 Carpendale, JLM, 132nl7 Carpenter, M., 51, 52, 138 Carruthers, P., 19n4, 25, 128, 131nl5, 132n21, 133n23, 241n2. [REVIEW] In Daniel D. Hutto & Matthew Ratcliffe (eds.), Folk Psychology Re-Assessed. Kluwer/Springer Press. 245.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. M. R. Bennett & P. M. S. Hacker (2005). David Cockburn, University of Wales Lampeter. Philosophical Investigations 28 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. M. R. Bennett (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Blackwell Pub..
    In this work, two distinguished figures from neuroscience and philosophy present a detailed critical survey of the philosophical foundations of cognitive ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. P. M. S. Hacker & M. R. Bennett (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
    The book "Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience" is an engaging criticism of cognitive neuroscience from the perspective of a Wittgensteinian philosophy of ordinary language. The authors' main claim is that assertions like "the brain sees" and "the left hemisphere thinks" are integral to cognitive neuroscience but that they are meaningless because they commit the mereological fallacy—ascribing to parts of humans, properties that make sense to predicate only of whole humans. The authors claim that this fallacy is at the heart of Cartesian (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation