Search results for 'M. R. DePaul' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. R. M. & Elizabeth Williams (1829). Letters From Elizabeth Williams to Anne Mowbray; or, Justice to Ourselves and Others, the Consequence of True Piety [Signed M- R-].
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  1
    Michael R. Depaul (1981). The Rationality of Belief in God: MICHAEL R. DEPAUL. Religious Studies 17 (3):343-356.
    In the introduction to his account of the debate concerning religion between Cleanthes, Philo and Demea, Pamphilus remarks that ‘reasonable men may be allowed to differ where no one can reasonably be positive’. Pamphilus goes on to suggest that natural theology is an area that abounds with issues about which ‘no one can reasonably be positive’. Assuming that the beliefs of reasonable men are themselves reasonable, Pamphilus can be interpreted as holding that If no one is reasonably positive that the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  3
    G. G. R. (1931). Psychopathology. By J. S. Nicole, M.R.C.P. & S. (London: Bailliere Tindall & Cox. 1930. Pp. Xii + 203. Price 10s. 6d.). Philosophy 6 (22):271-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  10
    G. B. R. (1914). The Authorship of the Platonic Epistles. By R. Hackforth, M.A. 8vo. 1 Vol. Pp. 203. Manchester: University Press, 1913. The Classical Review 28 (07):231-232.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  6
    Y. T. R. (1899). Cambridge Compositions Cambridge Compositions, Greek and Latin. Edited by R. D. Archer-Hind, M.A., and R. D. Hicks, M.A., Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge. Cambridge: At the University Press. 1899. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 13 (04):227-230.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  9
    C. S. R. (1895). Blake's Edition of Xenophon's Hellenica I. II., and Other Selections The Hellenica of Xenophon, Books I. And II., Together with Selections From Lysias C. Eratosthenes and From Aristotle's Constitution of Athens, Edited with Notes by R. W. Blake, A.M. Boston. 1894. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (04):231-.
  7.  49
    A. H. Louie (2006). (M,R)-Systems and Their Realizations. Axiomathes 16 (1-2):35-64.
    Robert Rosen’s (M,R)-systems are a class of relational models that define organisms. The realization of relational models plays a central role in his study of life, itself. Biology becomes identified with the class of material realizations of a certain kind of relational organization, exhibited in (M,R)-systems. In this paper I describe several realizations of (M,R)-systems, and in particular alternate realizations of the replication component.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  8.  19
    J. Prideaux (2011). Kinetic Models of (M-R)-Systems. Axiomathes 21 (3):373-392.
    Kinetic models using enzyme kinetics are developed for the three ways that Louie proved that Rosen’s minimal (M-R)-System can be closed to efficient cause; i.e., how the “replication” component can itself be entailed from within the system. The kinetic models are developed using the techniques of network thermodynamics. As a demonstration, each model is simulated using a SPICE circuit simulator using arbitrarily chosen rate constants. The models are built from SPICE sub-circuits representing the key terms in the chemical rate equations. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Charles R. Pigden (1990). Ought-Implies-Can: Erasmus Luther and R.M. Hare. Sophia 29 (1):2-30.
    l. There is an antinomy in Hare's thought between Ought-Implies-Can and No-Indicatives-from-Imperatives. It cannot be resolved by drawing a distinction between implication and entailment. 2. Luther resolved this antinomy in the l6th century, but to understand his solution, we need to understand his problem. He thought the necessity of Divine foreknowledge removed contingency from human acts, thus making it impossible for sinners to do otherwise than sin. 3. Erasmus objected (on behalf of Free Will) that this violates Ought-Implies-Can which he (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  10. M. R. Ayers (1969). Perception and Action: M. R. Ayers. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 3:91-106.
    There is an ancient and ambiguous philosophical doctrine that perception is passive. This can mean that the mind contributes nothing to the content of our sensory experience: its power of perception is a mere receptivity. In this sense the principle has often been questioned, and is indeed doubtful on empirical grounds, given one reasonable interpretation of what it would be for the mind to make such a contribution.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  1
    M. R. Ayers (1974). The Nature of Things: M. R. Ayers. Philosophy 49 (190):401-413.
    Anthony Quinton's The Nature of Things covers competently a good deal of philosophical ground in hopeful pursuit of a coherent ontology de-scribable as ‘a version of materialism’. He seems to discern two major difficulties for the enterprise: first, that of giving an acceptable account of ontology, and, secondly, that of reconciling his naturalism with his empiricist principles. ‘Naturalism’ is the view that man and his doings constitute a part of nature on the same ontological level as other natural things, and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. M. R. J. & Christian (1907). 'I Am a Christian and Cannot Fight' [Signed J.M.R.].
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  12
    R. M. Cook (1969). M. R. Popham and L. H. Sackett: Excavations at Lefkandi, Euboea: 1964–66. Pp. 35; 82 Figs. London:Thames and Hudson, 1968. Paper, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 19 (02):246-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  10
    R. M. Cook (1992). R. W. V. Catling, I. S. Lemos: Lefkandi II: The Protogeometric Building at Toumba (Edited by M. R. Popham, P. G. Calligas, L. H. Sackett). Part 1: The Pottery. Pp. Xv + 174; 81 Plates, London: The British School of Archaeology at Athens/Thames & Hudson, 1990. £40. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (01):227-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Roderick M. Chisholm & Keith Lehrer (eds.) (1975). Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm. D. Reidel Pub. Co..
    Taylor, R. A tribute.--Epistemology: Cornman, J. W. Chisholm on sensing and perceiving. Ross, J. F. Testimonial evidence. Lehrer, K. Reason and consistency. Keim, R. Epistemic values and epistemic viewpoints. Hanen, M. Confirmation, explanation, and acceptance. Canfield, J. V. "I know that I am in pain" is senseless. Steel, T. J. Knowledge and the self-presenting.--Metaphysics: Cartwright, R. Scattered objects. Duggan, T. J. Hume on causation. Arnaud, R. B. Brentanist relations. Johnson, M. L., Jr. Events as recurrables.--Ethics: Stevenson, J. T. On doxastic (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  10
    J. M. Edmonds (1910). Two Editions of the Characters of Theophrastvs Theophrasti Characteres Recensuit Hermannus Diels. Oxford Classical Texts. 1909. 3s. 6d. Net. Pp. Xxviii + (Unnumbered). Θεοφρστου Xαρακτρες. The Characters of Theophrastus. An English Translation From a Revised Text. With Introduction and Notes by R. C. Jebb, M.A. A New Edition. Edited by J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. Macmillan. 1909. 7s. 6d. Net. C. 23×14½. Pp. Xvi+229. [REVIEW] Classical Quarterly 4 (02):128-.
    Theophrasti Characteres recensuit Hermannus Diels. Oxford Classical Texts. 1909. 3s. 6d. net. Pp. xxviii + .Θεοφρστου Xαρακτxs22EFρες. The Characters of Theophrastus. An English Translation from a Revised Text. With Introduction and Notes by R. C. Jebb, M.A. A new edition. Edited by J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. Macmillan. 1909. 7s. 6d. net. c. 23×14½. Pp. xvi+229.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  9
    M. R. James (1894). Charles's Translation of the Book of Enoch The Book of Enoch, Translated From Professor Dillmann's Ethiopic Text, Emended and Revised in Accordance with Hitherto Uncollated Ethiopic MSS. And with the Gizeh and Other Greek and Latin Fragments, Which Are Here Published in Full. Edited, with Introduction, Notes, Appendices, and Indices by R. H. Charles, M.A., Trinity College, Dublin, and Exeter College, Oxford. Oxford, the Clarendon Press, 1893. 16. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 8 (1-2):41-44.
  18.  7
    M. R. Wright (1992). R. M. Dancy: Two Studies in the Early Academy. (Suny Series in Ancient Greek Philosophy.) Pp. Xii + 219. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1991. Paper, $14.95. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (02):457-458.
  19.  4
    R. G. Bury (1918). The Biblical Antiquities of Philo. By M. R. James. Octavo. Pp. 280. S.P.C.K. 8s. 6d. Net. The Classical Review 32 (5-6):132-133.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  14
    W. R. Halliday (1926). Ancient Greece at Work Ancient Greece at Work. An Economic History of Greece From the Homeric Period to the Roman Conquest. By Gustave Glotz. Translated by M. R. Dobie. Pp. Xii + 402; Forty-Nine Illustrations in Text. (The History of Civilisation.) London: Kegan Paul; New York: Knopf, 1926. 16s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (06):194-195.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  8
    W. R. Halliday (1927). The Formation of the Greek People The Formation of the Greek People. By A. Jardé. Translated by M. R. Dobie. Pp. Xvi + 369; Seven Maps in Text. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co.; New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Price 16s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):64-65.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  8
    P. M. Fraser (1964). Monuments of Asia Minor W. M. Calder and J.M.R. Cormack: Monumenta Asiae Minoris Antiqua. Vol. Viii. Monuments From Lycaonia, The Pisidio-Phrygian Borderland, Aphrodisias. Pp. Xv+190; 40 Plates, 14 Pp. Of Line-Drawings. Manchester: University Press, 1962. Cloth, £5. 5s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 14 (01):77-80.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  3
    Edward M. Harris (2000). ΦIΛOΔIKEIN ΔOKOΓMEN M. R. Christ: The Litigious Athenian . Pp. Viii + 317. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999. Cased, £33. ISBN: 0-8018-5863-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (02):499-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  6
    M. L. Clarke (1962). Three Literatures M. R. Ridley: Studies in Three Literatures. English, Latin, Greek. Pp. Xi+177. London: Dent, 1962. Cloth, 30s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 12 (03):298-300.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  6
    M. J. Edwards (2001). R. S. Kraemer, M. R. D'Angelo (Edd.): Women and Christian Origins . Pp. X + 406. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Paper, £14.99. ISBN: 0-19-510396-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (01):177-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  1
    R. De Bengy Puyvalleé (1948). A Propos de la Communication de M. R. Bayer. Dialectica 2 (2):209-210.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    M. A. Stewart (1976). George Berkeley: Philosophical Works Ed. And Intr. By M. R. Ayers. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 17 (3):109-110.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  3
    R. G. Swinburne (1968). The Refutation of Determinism. By M. R. Ayers. (London: Methuen & Co. Ltd, 1968. Price 37s. 6d.). Philosophy 43 (166):390-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. R. De Bengy Puyvalleé (1948). A Propos de la Communication de M. R. Bayer. Dialectica 2 (2):209-210.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. R. Berthelot (1934). APPENDICE: Note rectificative sur la séance du 26 mai 1934, par M. R. BERTHELOT. Société Française de Philosophie, Bulletin 34 (5):(1934:oct./déc.).
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. M. Macdonald (1946). COHEN, M. R. -A Preface to Logic. [REVIEW] Mind 55:364.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. R. G. Swinburne (1968). AYERS, M. R.-"The Refutation of Determinism". [REVIEW] Philosophy 43:390.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  2
    David Parsons (forthcoming). R. M. Martin’s Logic of Belief. History and Philosophy of Logic:1-15.
    In this paper I revisit R. M. Martin’s logic of belief. As with much of Martin’s work, his formal studies into belief and belief reports have gone largely unnoticed. However, in my article I suggest reasons for thinking that these studies warrant revisiting. One reason is that Martin adopted an account of the notion of belief which was more comprehensive than that employed by most rival theorists. Another reason is that Martin couched his theory in a formal pragmatics which utilised (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  2
    Anselmo Carvalho de Oliveira (2016). R.M. Hare's Solution to the Problems of Descriptivism and Moral Emotivism. Ideas Y Valores 65 (160):5-28.
    Na primeira parte, argumento que o descritivismo proposto por Moritz Schlick não compreende adequadamente a função dos juízos morais. Na segunda parte, argumento que o emotivismo não apresenta uma explicação adequada para o papel da razão na ética. Na terceira parte, argumento que o prescritivismo universal proposto por R. M. Hare avança na solução dos problemas do emotivismo, porque amplia o papel da razão na ética, e na solução dos problemas do descritivismo, porque compreende a função dos juízos morais na (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  52
    Richard Gale (1998). R. M. Adams's Theodicy of Grace. Philo 1 (1):36-44.
    R. M. Adams’s essay, “Must God Create the Best?” can be interpreted as offering a theodicy for God’s creating morally less perfect beings than he could have created. By creating these morally less perfect beings, God is bestowing grace upon them, which is an unmerited or undeserved benefit. He does so, however, in advance of the free moral misdeeds that render them undeserving. This requires that God have middle knowledge, pace Adams’s version of the Free Will Theodicy, of what would (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  63
    David Schweickart, Economic Democracy: A W o R T H y S o C I a L I S M That Would Really Work.
    w a y s h a v e b e e n . W e a l l r e m e m b e r M a r x ' s p o l e m i c a g a i n s t P r o u d h o n , t h e Manifesto's critique of "historical action [yielding] to personal inventive action, historically created conditions of emancipation to fantastic ones, and the gradual spontaneous class (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. R. M. Hare (1993). Objective Prescriptions*: R. M. Hare. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 35:1-17.
    I offer no apology for presenting a simple paper about what is essentially a simple subject: the objectivity of moral judgments. Most of the complications are introduced by those who do not grasp the distinctions I shall be making. I am afraid that they include the majority of moral philosophers at the present time. These complications can be unravelled; but not in a short paper. I have tried to do it in my other writings.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  30
    Anthony Skelton (2001). Review of R. M. Hare, Sorting Out Ethics. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):583 – 585.
    This is a short review of R.M. Hare's Sorting Out Ethics. It critically evaluates Hare's universal prescriptivism.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  23
    Virginia Moyer, Steven M. Teutsch & Jeffrey R. Botkin (2009). Virginia Moyer, Steven M. Teutsch, and Jeffrey R. Botkin Reply. Hastings Center Report 39 (1):7-8.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  1
    R. M. Sainsbury & Michael Tye (2011). I—R. M. Sainsbury and Michael Tye: An Originalist Theory of Concepts. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 85 (1):101-124.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  8
    Petr Dvořák (2006). Univerzální preskriptivismus R. M. Hara. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):56-61.
    Praescriptivismus universalis R. M. HariiDisseratinis huius finis est, R. M Harii doctrinam ethicam, quae in libris, quibus tituli The language of Morals (1952) et Freedom and Reason (1963) exponitur, et systematice proponere et critice interpretari. Haec doctrina, quamquam ob multa apte dicta magna attentione digna est, difficultatibus tamen gravibus expers esse non videtur. Praecipua harum difficultatum in hoc consistit, quod, unde principiorum seu praeceptorum moralium vis obligandi proveniat, auctor non prodit.Universal Prescriptivism of R. M. HareThe article is a critical systematic (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  5
    R. M. Rattenbury (1933). Die apokrypken Apostelgeschichten und die romanhafte Literatur der Antike. Von Rosa Söder. (Würzburger Studien zur Altertumswissenschaft, Heft 3.) Pp. xii+216. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1932. Paper, R.M. 12. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 47 (01):39-.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  4
    Lenart Škof (2010). In Dialogue for Democracy. R. M. Unger's Pragmatist Vision of Democratic Experimentalism and Explorations of Democracy in Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):233-242.
    The paper focuses on R. M. Unger’s pragmatist vision of democratic experimentalism and its possible application to the area of contemporary intercultural philosophy. The paper connects the field of American pragmatism’s political and social thought with the contemporary pressing issues of intercultural philosophy. In the second part, Unger’s philosophy is put into a dialogue with the philosophy of Luce Irigaray, thus opening a new platform for the ethico-political vision of democracy in the era of globalization. The analysis of the democratic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  4
    L. R. Frankel, A. Goldworth & M. V. Rorty (2006). Please Note That Not All Books Mentioned on This List Will Be Reviewed. Anand, S., Peter, F. And Sen, A.: 2005, Public Health, Ethics and Equity. OUP. ISBN: 199276366. Price: $99. Ashcroft, R., Lucassen, A., Parker, M., Verkerk. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9:259.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  11
    R. G. M. Nisbet (1992). A New Teubner of Martial D. R. Shackleton Bailey (Ed.): M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammata, Post W. Heraeum. (Bibliotheca Teubneriana.) Pp. Xx + 542. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1990. DM 168. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (01):50-51.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  6
    Adrián Bertorello (2012). La función poética del lenguaje en el discurso filosófico de M. Heidegger. Una interpretación del estilo heideggeriano desde V. Shklovski y R. Jakobson. [REVIEW] Areté. Revista de Filosofía 22 (2):177-188.
    El presente trabajo tiene por finalidad analizar el componente estilístico y enunciativo del discurso filosófico de M. Heidegger. Para ello se vale de la interpretación de la función poética del lenguaje de V. Shklovski y R. Jakobson. La tesis que se intentará justificar radica en que el discurso heideggeriano de los años 1919 a 1927 apela a recursos estilísticos poéticos tales como los pleonasmos y las paradojas. Esta elección se justifica en el plano de la enunciación. En efecto, el estilo (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  12
    R. M. Cook (1958). R. Lullies and M. Hirmer: Greek Sculpture. Pp. 88; 264 Plates (8 in Colour), 11 Figs. London: Thames and Hudson, 1957. Cloth, 63s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 8 (3-4):299-300.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  11
    Celia E. Schultz (2008). Wildfang (R.L.) Rome's Vestal Virgins. A Study of Rome's Vestal Priestesses in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Pp. Xiv + 158, Ills. London and New York: Routledge, 2006. Paper, £19.99, US$35.95 (Cased, £60, US$110). ISBN: 0-415-39796-0 (0-415-39795-2 Hbk). Martini (M.C.) Le Vestali. Un Sacerdozio Funzionale Al 'Cosmo' Romano. (Collection Latomus 282.) Pp. 264. Brussels: Éditions Latomus, 2004. Paper, €38. ISBN: 2-87031-223-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 58 (01):212-214.
    The Vestal Virgins are one of the most famous elements of Roman religion, yet despite their perennial appeal and the importance of some smaller scale studies of the priesthood, the priestesses have not received a monograph-length study since F. Giuzzi, Aspetti giuridici del sacerdozio romano. II sacerdozio di Vesta (Naples, 1968). Now we have books by R.L. Wildfang and M.C. Martini that could not be more different. The former offers a thorough survey of what the sources can tell us about (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  3
    Lenart Škof (2010). Im Dialog für die Demokratie. R. M. Ungers pragmatistische Vision des demokratischen Experimentalismus und der Demokratieforschung bei Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):233-242.
    Diese Arbeit fokussiert sich auf R. M. Ungers pragmatistische Vision des demokratischen Experimentalismus sowie dessen etwaige Anwendung auf die zeitgenössische interkulturelle Philosophie. Hierbei wird das Sachgebiet des politischen und sozialen Gedankens aus dem amerikanischen Pragmatismus mit den kontemporären Kernfragen der interkulturellen Philosophie in Verbindung gebracht. Im zweiten Teil wird Ungers Philosophie mit jener Luce Irigarays in Dialog gesetzt, wodurch eine neue Plattform zur ethisch-politischen Demokratievision in der Globalisierungsära eröffnet wird. Somit stellt sich die Analyse des demokratischen Experimentalismus selbsttätig her – (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  3
    Lenart Škof (2010). En dialogue pour la démocratie. La vision pragmatique de l'expérimentalisme démocratique de R. M. Unger et l'étude de la démocratie chez Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):233-242.
    L’article se focalise sur la vision pragmatique de l’expérimentalisme démocratique de R. M. Unger et sur sa mise en application possible dans le domaine de la philosophie interculturelle contemporaine. Le champ de la pensée politique et sociale dans le pragmatisme américain est mis en relation avec des questions importantes de la philosophie interculturelle contemporaine. Dans la deuxième partie, la philosophie de Unger est mise en dialogue avec la philosophie de Luce Irigaray, ouvrant ainsi une nouvelle plate-forme pour une vision éthico-politique (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000