Search results for 'M. S. N. RN' (try it on Scholar)

4 found
Sort by:
  1. Sally E. Thorne RN PhD, Angela D. Henderson RN PhD, PhD & M. S. N. RN (2004). The Problematic Allure of the Binary in Nursing Theoretical Discourse. Nursing Philosophy 5 (3):208–215.score: 502.5
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paul R. Helft, Patricia D. Bledsoe, Maureen Hancock, M. S. N. Rn, Steve S. Ivy & Lucia D. Wocial (2009). Ethics Conversations May Help Lower Nurses' Moral Distress. Ethics 19 (6).score: 502.5
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. M. S. N. BA & Marit Kirkevold RN EdD (2003). Truth and Validity in Grounded Theorya Reconsidered Realist Interpretation of the Criteria: Fit, Work, Relevance and Modifiability. Nursing Philosophy 4 (3):189–200.score: 50.3
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Matthew W. Parker (2003). Three Concepts of Decidability for General Subsets of Uncountable Spaces. Theoretical Computer Science 351 (1):2-13.score: 48.0
    There is no uniquely standard concept of an effectively decidable set of real numbers or real n-tuples. Here we consider three notions: decidability up to measure (...)zero [M.W. Parker, Undecidability in Rn: Riddled basins, the KAM tori, and the stability of the solar system, Phil. Sci. 70(2) (2003) 359382], which we abbreviate d.m.z.; recursive approximability [or r.a.; K.-I. Ko, Complexity Theory of Real Functions, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1991]; and decidability ignoring boundaries [d.i.b.; W.C. Myrvold, The decision problem for entanglement, in: R.S. Cohen et al. (Eds.), Potentiality, Entanglement, and Passion-at-a-Distance: Quantum Mechanical Studies fo Abner Shimony, Vol. 2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Great Britain, 1997, pp. 177190]. Unlike some others in the literature, these notions apply not only to certain nice sets, but to general sets in Rn and other appropriate spaces. We consider some motivations for these concepts and the logical relations between them. It has been argued that d.m.z. is especially appropriate for physical applications, and on Rn with the standard measure, it is strictly stronger than r.a. [M.W. Parker, Undecidability in Rn: Riddled basins, the KAM tori, and the stability of the solar system, Phil. Sci. 70(2) (2003) 359382]. Here we show that this is the only implication that holds among our three decidabilities in that setting. Under arbitrary measures, even this implication fails. Yet for intervals of non-zero length, and more generally, convex sets of non-zero measure, the three concepts are equivalent. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation