18 found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Maarten Van Dyck & Albrecht Heeffer (2014). Script and Symbolic Writing in Mathematics and Natural Philosophy. Foundations of Science 19 (1):1-10.
    We introduce the question whether there are specific kinds of writing modalities and practices that facilitated the development of modern science and mathematics. We point out the importance and uniqueness of symbolic writing, which allowed early modern thinkers to formulate a new kind of questions about mathematical structure, rather than to merely exploit this structure for solving particular problems. In a very similar vein, the novel focus on abstract structural relations allowed for creative conceptual extensions in natural philosophy during the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Anna de Bruyckere & Maarten Van Dyck (2013). Being in or Getting at the Real: Kochan on Rouse, Heidegger and Minimal Realism. Perspectives on Science 21 (4):453-462.
    The debate between realism and antirealism has been central in the general philosophy of science of the last decades. But ever since the heydays of the debate in the 1980s, there have been authors who have tried to argue for the overcoming or dissolution of the debate itself, by proposing a position that is neither realist nor antirealist. Prominent among these is Joseph Rouse (Rouse 1987). Yet, Jeff Kochan has recently argued that Rouse, despite his efforts to transcend the realism/antirealism (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Maarten van Dyck & Karin Verelst (2013). “Whatever Is Neither Everywhere Nor Anywhere Does Not Exist”: The Concepts of Space and Time in Newton and Leibniz. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 18 (3):399-402.
  4. Erik Weber & Maarten Van Dyck (2012). Rationally Evaluating Inconsistent Theories. Philosophica 86.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Maarten Van Dyck (2011). Helen Hattab . Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. 236. $93.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (1):157-161.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Maarten Van Dyck (2011). Helen Hattab, Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms. [REVIEW] Hopos 1 (1):157-161.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David Etlin, Maarten Van Dyck, Phil Dowe, Julian Reiss, Thomas Ac Reydon, Sabina Leonelli, Marshall Abrams, William Bechtel, Joshua Filler & Yoichi Ishida (2009). 10. The Problem of Noncounterfactual Conditionals The Problem of Noncounterfactual Conditionals (Pp. 676-688). Philosophy of Science 76 (5).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Maarten Van Dyck (2009). Dynamics of Reason and the Kantian Project. Philosophy of Science 76 (5):689-700.
    I show why Michael Friedman’s idea that we should view new constitutive frameworks introduced in paradigm change as members of a convergent series introduces an uncomfortable tension in his views. It cannot be justified on realist grounds, as this would compromise his Kantian perspective, but his own appeal to a Kantian regulative ideal of reason cannot do the job either. I then explain a way to make better sense of the rationality of paradigm change on what I take to be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Maarten Van Dyck (2009). On the Epistemological Foundations of the Law of the Lever. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (3):315-318.
    In this paper I challenge Paolo Palmieri’s reading of the Mach-Vailati debate on Archimedes’s proof of the law of the lever. I argue that the actual import of the debate concerns the possible epistemic (as opposed to merely pragmatic) role of mathematical arguments in empirical physics, and that construed in this light Vailati carries the upper hand. This claim is defended by showing that Archimedes’s proof of the law of the lever is not a way of appealing to a non-empirical (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Bert Leuridan, Erik Weber & Maarten Van Dyck (2008). The Practical Value of Spurious Correlations: Selective Versus Manipulative Policy. Analysis 68 (300):298-303.
    In the past 25 years, many philosophers have endorsed the view that the practical value of causal knowledge lies in the fact that manipulation of causes is a good way to bring about a desired change in the effect. This view is intuitively very plausible. For instance, we can predict a storm on the basis of a barometer reading, but we cannot avoid the storm by manipulating the state of the barometer (barometer status and storm are effects of a common (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Maarten Van Dyck (2007). Constructive Empiricism and the Argument From Underdetermination. In Bradley John Monton (ed.), Images of Empiricism: Essays on Science and Stances, with a Reply From Bas C. Van Fraassen. Oxford University Press.
    It is argued that, contrary to prevailing opinion, Bas van Fraassen nowhere uses the argument from underdetermination in his argument for constructive empiricism. It is explained that van Fraassen’s use of the notion of empirical equivalence in The Scientific Image has been widely misunderstood. A reconstruction of the main arguments for constructive empiricism is offered, showing how the passages that have been taken to be part of an appeal to the argument from underdetermination should actually be interpreted.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Maarten Van Dyck (2006). Gravitating Towards Stability: Guidobaldo's Aristotelian-Archimedean Synthesis. History of Science 44 (4):373-407.
  13. Maarten Van Dyck (2005). The Paradox of Conceptual Novelty and Galileo's Use of Experiments. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):864-875.
    Starting with a discussion of what I call Koyré’s paradox of conceptual novelty, I introduce the ideas of Damerow et al. on the establishment of classical mechanics in Galileo’s work. I then argue that although the view of Damerow et al. on the nature of Galileo’s conceptual innovation is convincing, it misses an essential element: Galileo’s use of the experiments described in the first day of the Two New Sciences. I describe these experiments and analyze their function. Central to my (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Maarten Van Dyck (2004). Causal Discovery Using Adaptive Logics. Towards a More Realistic Heuristics for Human Causal Learning. Logique Et Analyse 185 (188):5-32.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Maarten Van Dyck (2003). The Roles of One Thought Experiment in Interpreting Quantum Mechanics. Werner Heisenberg Meets Thomas Kuhn. Philosophica 72 (3):79-103.
    Recent years saw the rise of an interest in the roles and significance of thought experiments in different areas of human thinking. Heisenberg's gamma ray microscope is no doubt one of the most famous examples of a thought experiment in physics. Nevertheless, this particular thought experiment has not received much detailed attention in the philosophical literature on thought experiments up to date, maybe because of its often claimed inadequacies. In this paper, I try to do two things: to provide an (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Erik Weber & Maarten Van Dyck (2002). Unification and Explanation. Synthese 131 (1):145 - 154.
    In this article we criticize two recent articles that examinethe relation between explanation and unification. Halonen and Hintikka (1999), on the one hand,claim that no unification is explanation. Schurz (1999), on the other hand, claims that all explanationis unification. We give counterexamples to both claims. We propose a pluralistic approach to the problem:explanation sometimes consists in unification, but in other cases different kinds of explanation(e.g., causal explanation) are required; and none of these kinds is more fundamental.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Liza Verhoeven, All Premises Are Equal, But Some Are More, Erik Weber, Maarten van Dyck & Adaptive Logic (2001). Dirk Batens, Editorial Note 3 Andrzej Wisniewski, Questions and Inferences 5 Diderik Batens, a General Characterization of Adaptive Logics. 45 Mariusz Urbanski, Synthetic Tableaux and Erotetic Search Scenarios: Extension and Extraction 69. [REVIEW] Logique Et Analyse 44:1.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Erik Weber & Maarten Van Dyck (2001). Adaptive Logic and Covering Law Explanations. Logique Et Analyse 44:237.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation