96 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Peter Machamer (University of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh)
  1. Peter Machamer, Please Scroll Down for Article.
    This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter K. Machamer & Martin Carrier (eds.) (forthcoming). Philosophy and the Sciences of Mind.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. G. Wolters & Peter K. Machamer (eds.) (forthcoming). Studies in Causality: Historical and Contemporary. University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Peter Machamer (2014). Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes Studies 27 (1):1-12.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Peter Machamer & Benjamin Goldberg (2013). Controversies Within the Scientific Revolution. [REVIEW] Isis 104:394-395.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Peter Machamer, J. E. Mcguire & Hylarie Kochiras (2012). Newton and the Mechanical Philosophy: Gravitation as the Balance of the Heavens. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):370-388.
    We argue that Isaac Newton really is best understood as being in the tradition of the Mechanical Philosophy and, further, that Newton saw himself as being in this tradition. But the tradition as Newton understands it is not that of Robert Boyle and many others, for whom the Mechanical Philosophy was defined by contact action and a corpuscularean theory of matter. Instead, as we argue in this paper, Newton interpreted and extended the Mechanical Philosophy's slogan “matter and motion” in reference (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Drozdstoj St Stoyanov, Peter K. Machamer & Kenneth F. Schaffner (2012). Rendering Clinical Psychology an Evidence‐Based Scientific Discipline: A Case Study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (1):149-154.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Drozdstoj Stoyanov, Peter K. Machamer, Kenneth F. Schaffner & Rayito Rivera‐Hernández (2012). The Challenge of Psychiatric Nosology and Diagnosis. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):704-709.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Drozdstoj Stoyanov, Peter K. Machamer, Kenneth F. Schaffner & Rayito Rivera‐Hernández (2012). The Meta‐Language of Psychiatry as Cross‐Disciplinary Effort: In Response to Zachar (2012). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):710-720.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jim Bogen & Peter Machamer (2011). Mechanistic Information and Causal Continuity. In Phyllis McKay Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality in the Sciences. Oup Oxford.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Peter Machamer (2011). Disciplines in the Making: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Elites, Learning, and Innovation. [REVIEW] Isis 102:553-554.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Peter Machamer (2011). Phenomena, Data and Theories: A Special Issue of Synthese. Synthese 182 (1):1-5.
    The papers collected here are the result of an INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM: Data · Phenomena · Theories: What’s the notion of a scientific phenomenon good for? held in Heidelberg in September 2008. The event was organized by the research group Causality, Cognition, and the Constitution of Scientific Phenomena in cooperation with Philosophy Department at the University of Heidelberg (Peter McLaughlin and Andreas Kemmerling) and the IWH Heidelberg. The symposium was supported by the Emmy-Noether-Programm der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft and by Stiftung Universitat Heidelebrg (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Peter Machamer (2010). Some Cogitations on Interpretations. In Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.), Interpretation: Ways of Thinking About the Sciences and the Arts. University of Pittsburgh Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.) (2010). Interpretation: Ways of Thinking About the Sciences and the Arts. University of Pittsburgh Press.
    That ubiquity serves as the inspiration for the fourteen essays of this volume, covering many of the domains in which interpretive practices are found.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Peter Machamer, Explaining Mechanisms.
    An overview of how mechanisms work in explanations.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Peter K. Machamer (2009). Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press.
    This is the first book to focus on Descartes's changing views, and it is welcome."--Roger Ariew, University of South Florida.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Peter K. Machamer (2009). Neuroscience, Learning and the Return to Behaviorism. In John Bickle (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press. 166--178.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Peter Machamer & Justin Sytsma (2009). Philosophy and the Brain Sciences. Iris 1 (2):353-374.
    What are the differences between philosophy and science, or between the methods of philosophy and the methods of science? Unlike some philosophers we do not find philosophy and the methods of philosophy to be sui generis. Science, and in particular neuroscience, has much to tell us about the nature of the world and the concepts that we must use to understand and explain it. Yet science cannot function well without reflective analysis of the concepts, methods, and practices that constitute it. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (2009). Contents. In J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (eds.), Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (2009). Chapter Four. Body-Body Causation and the Cartesian World of Matter. In J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (eds.), Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press. 111-163.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (2009). Chapter Five. Mind, Intuition, Innateness, and Ideas. In J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (eds.), Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press. 164-197.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (2009). Chapter One. From Method to Epistemology and From Metaphysics to the Epistemic Stance. In J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (eds.), Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press. 1-35.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (2009). Chapter Six. Mind-Body Causality and the Mind-Body Union: The Case of Sensation. In J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (eds.), Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press. 198-242.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (2009). Chapter Two. God and Efficient Causation. In J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (eds.), Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press. 36-81.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (2009). Chapter Three. Seeing the Implications of His Causal Views: The Response to His Critics. In J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (eds.), Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press. 82-110.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (2009). Index. In J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (eds.), Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press. 251-258.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (2009). Preface. In J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (eds.), Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (2009). References. In J. E. McGuire & Peter Machamer (eds.), Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press. 243-250.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Drozdstoj Stoyanov, Peter Machamer & Kenneth Schaffner, In Quest for Scientific Psychiatry: Towards Bridging the Explanatory Gap.
    The contemporary epistemic status of mental health disciplines does not allow the cross validation of mental disorders among various genetic markers, biochemical pathway or mechanisms, and clinical assessments in neuroscience explanations. We attempt to provide a meta-empirical analysis of the contemporary status of the cross-disciplinary issues existing between neuro-biology and psychopathology. Our case studies take as an established medical mode an example cross validation between biological sciences and clinical cardiology in the case of myocardial infarction. This is then contrasted with (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Anne Davenport & Peter Machamer (2008). Letter to the Editor. Isis 99:585-585.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Peter Machamer (2008). Descartes's Theory of Action. [REVIEW] Isis 99:178-179.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Peter Machamer, Galileo Galilei. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Peter Machamer (2008). Review of Barry C. Smith (Ed.), Fritz Allhoff (Ed.), Questions of Taste: The Philosophy of Wine; and, Wine and Philosophy: A Symposium on Thinking and Drinking. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (4).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Peter Machamer (2007). Daniela Bailer-Jones, 1969-2006. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):211 – 212.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Peter Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.) (2007). Thinking About Causes: From Greek Philosophy to Modern Physics. University of Pittsburgh Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. P. K. Machamer & J. M. Sytsma (2005). Neuroscience & the Nature of Philosophy. Iride 46:495-514.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Peter K. Machamer, James E. McGuire & Justin Sytsma (2005). Knowing Causes: Descartes on the World of Matter. Philosophica 76.
    In this essay, we discuss how Descartes arrives at his mature view of material causation. Descartes’ position changes over time in some very radical ways. The last section spells out his final position as to how causation works in the world of material objects. When considering Descartes’ causal theories, it is useful to distinguish between ‘vertical’ and ‘horizontal’ causation. The vertical perspective addresses God’s relation to creation. God is essential being, and every being other than God depends upon God in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Peter Machamer & Justin Sytsma (2005). Neuroscienze e natura della filosofia. Iride 18 (3):495-514.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Aristeides Baltas & Peter K. Machamer (2004). Athens-Pittsburgh Symposium in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology. Perspectives on Science 12 (3):243-243.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Aristides Baltas & Peter Machamer (2004). For Philosophy of Science, and European Cultural Center of Delphi. The Topic of the Symposium, Convened at the European Cultural Center of Delphi, Was Forms of Proof and Demonstration in Philosophy and Science. These Symposia Are Held Every Two Years in Greece in Recognition of Athens as the Birthplace of Western Philosophy (All of Them Supported By. [REVIEW] Perspectives on Science 12 (3).
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Peter Machamer (2004). Activities and Causation: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Mechanisms. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):27 – 39.
    This article deals with mechanisms conceived as composed of entities and activities. In response to many perplexities about the nature of activities, a number of arguments are developed concerning their epistemic and ontological status. Some questions concerning the relations between cause and causal explanation and mechanisms are also addressed.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.) (2004). Science, Values, and Objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Few people, if any, still argue that science in all its aspects is a value-free endeavor. At the very least, values affect decisions about the choice of research problems to investigate and the uses to which the results of research are applied. But what about the actual doing of science? -/- As Science, Values, and Objectivity reveals, the connections and interactions between values and science are quite complex. The essays in this volume identify the crucial values that play a role (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Peter Machamer & Brian Hepburn (2004). Galileo and the Pendulum: Latching on to Time. Science and Education 13 (4-5):333-347.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Andrea Falcon & Peter Machamer (2003). Wagner, Michael F. Neoplatonism and Nature: Studies in Plotinus' “Enneads”. Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):907-908.
  45. Peter MacHamer & Lisa Osbeck (2003). Scientific Normativity as Non-Epistemic: A Hidden Kuhnian Legacy. Social Epistemology 17 (1):3 – 11.
  46. Ramón Moreno Cuevas, Peter Machamer, Michael Silberstein, Yuri Balashov, Alex Rosenberg & Lynette Hunter (2002). Rescher, Nicholas (2001), Minding Matter, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publish-Ers, USD 60 (Cloth), USD 21.95 (Pb). Fuller, Steve (2002), Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, USD 22.50 (Pb). [REVIEW] Synthese 133:455-456.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Peter Machamer, Activities and Causation.
    This paper details the ontological and epistemic character of activties that occur in mechanisms. It explains why they are sufficient to handle the problems of causation.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Peter Machamer (2002). Essays on Galileo and the History and Philosophy of Science. Volumes 1–3. [REVIEW] Isis 93:697-697.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Peter K. Machamer & Michael Silberstein (eds.) (2002). Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Peter K. Machamer & Michael Silberstein (eds.) (2002). The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell.
    This volume presentsa definitive introduction to the core areas of philosophy of science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 96