Search results for 'Magnitude' (try it on Scholar)

805 found
Order:
  1.  59
    Jacob Beck (2015). Analogue Magnitude Representations: A Philosophical Introduction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (4):829-855.
    Empirical discussions of mental representation appeal to a wide variety of representational kinds. Some of these kinds, such as the sentential representations underlying language use and the pictorial representations of visual imagery, are thoroughly familiar to philosophers. Others have received almost no philosophical attention at all. Included in this latter category are analogue magnitude representations, which enable a wide range of organisms to primitively represent spatial, temporal, numerical, and related magnitudes. This article aims to introduce analogue magnitude representations (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Sacha Golob (2014). Kant on Intentionality, Magnitude, and the Unity of Perception. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (4):505-528.
    This paper addresses a number of closely related questions concerning Kant's model of intentionality, and his conceptions of unity and of magnitude [Gröβe]. These questions are important because they shed light on three issues which are central to the Critical system, and which connect directly to the recent analytic literature on perception: the issues are conceptualism, the status of the imagination, and perceptual atomism. In Section 1, I provide a sketch of the exegetical and philosophical problems raised by Kant's (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  19
    Eric W. Stein & Norita Ahmad (2009). Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) to Construct a Measure of the Magnitude of Consequences Component of Moral Intensity. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (3):391 - 407.
    The purpose of this work is to elaborate an empirically grounded mathematical model of the magnitude of consequences component of “moral intensity” (Jones, Academy of Management Review 16 (2),366, 1991) that can be used to evaluate different ethical situations. The model is built using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) (Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980) and empirical data from the legal profession. One contribution of our work is that it illustrates how AHP can be applied in the field (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4.  22
    Joanna Golinska-Pilarek, Angel Mora & Emilio Munoz Velasco (2008). An ATP of a Relational Proof System for Order of Magnitude Reasoning with Negligibility, Non-Closeness and Distance. In Tu-Bao Ho & Zhi-Hua Zhou (eds.), PRICAI 2008: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Springer 128--139.
    We introduce an Automatic Theorem Prover (ATP) of a dual tableau system for a relational logic for order of magnitude qualitative reasoning, which allows us to deal with relations such as negligibility, non-closeness and distance. Dual tableau systems are validity checkers that can serve as a tool for verification of a variety of tasks in order of magnitude reasoning, such as the use of qualitative sum of some classes of numbers. In the design of our ATP, we have (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  11
    Joanna Golińska-Pilarek & Emilio Munoz-Velasco (2009). Dual Tableau for a Multimodal Logic for Order of Magnitude Qualitative Reasoning with Bidirectional Negligibility. International Journal of Computer Mathematics 86 (10-11):1707–1718.
    We present a relational proof system in the style of dual tableaux for the relational logic associated with a multimodal propositional logic for order of magnitude qualitative reasoning with a bidirectional relation of negligibility. We study soundness and completeness of the proof system and we show how it can be used for verification of validity of formulas of the logic.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  5
    Joanna Golinska-Pilarek (2012). On Decidability of a Logic for Order of Magnitude Qualitative Reasoning with Bidirectional Negligibility. In Luis Farinas del Cerro, Andreas Herzig & Jerome Mengin (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer 255--266.
    Qualitative Reasoning (QR) is an area of research within Artificial Intelligence that automates reasoning and problem solving about the physical world. QR research aims to deal with representation and reasoning about continuous aspects of entities without the kind of precise quantitative information needed by conventional numerical analysis techniques. Order-of-magnitude Reasoning (OMR) is an approach in QR concerned with the analysis of physical systems in terms of relative magnitudes. In this paper we consider the logic OMR_N for order-of-magnitude reasoning (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  2
    Stanley J. Rule, Ronald C. Laye & Dwight W. Curtis (1974). Magnitude Judgments and Difference Judgments of Lightness and Darkness: A Two-Stage Analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1108.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   62 citations  
  8.  6
    William P. Banks & David K. Hill (1974). The Apparent Magnitude of Number Scaled by Random Production. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (2):353.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   37 citations  
  9.  3
    Norman H. Anderson (1974). Cross-Task Validation of Functional Measurement Using Judgments of Total Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (2):226.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  10.  3
    Stanley J. Rule, Dwight W. Curtis & Robert P. Markley (1970). Input and Output Transformations From Magnitude Estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (3):343.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  11.  2
    Dwight W. Curtis (1970). Magnitude Estimations and Category Judgments of Brightness and Brightness Intervals: A Two-Stage Interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):201.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  12.  6
    O. J. Harvey & Donald T. Campbell (1963). Judgments of Weight as Affected by Adaptation Range, Adaptation Duration, Magnitude of Unlabeled Anchor, and Judgmental Language. Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):12.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   29 citations  
  13.  1
    Panna Lal Pradham & Paul J. Hoffman (1963). Effect of Spacing and Range of Stimuli on Magnitude Estimation Judgements. Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (6):533.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  14.  5
    George Collier & Melvin H. Marx (1959). Changes in Performance as a Function of Shifts in the Magnitude of Reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (5):305.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  15.  4
    E. J. Capaldi & David Lynch (1967). Repeated Shifts in Reward Magnitude: Evidence in Favor of an Associational and Absolute (Noncontextual) Interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (2):226.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  16.  17
    F. Nowell Jones & Maxine J. Marcus (1961). The Subject Effect in Judgments of Subjective Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (1):40.
  17.  2
    John R. Mackinnon (1967). Interactive Effects of the Two Rewards in a Differential Magnitude of Reward Discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (3):329.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18.  1
    Paul J. Woods (1967). Performance Changes in Escape Conditioning Following Shifts in the Magnitude of Reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):487.
  19.  4
    David Ehrenfreund & Pietro Badia (1962). Response Strength as a Function of Drive Level and Pre- and Postshift Incentive Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (5):468.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  20.  9
    Robert Fox & Ronald Check (1972). Independence Between Binocular Rivalry Suppression Duration and Magnitude of Suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (2):283.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  6
    Richard H. Peckham & Abram Amsel (1967). Within-Subject Demonstration of a Relationship Between Frustration and Magnitude of Reward in a Differential Magnitude of Reward Discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (2):187.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  5
    George A. Gescheider & John H. Wright (1968). Effects of Sensory Adaptation on the Form of the Psychophysical Magnitude Function for Cutaneous Vibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):308.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  4
    Richard G. Seymann (1969). Effect of Differences in Reward Magnitude with Correlated Cues on Running Speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):504.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  4
    Frank C. Leeming (1968). Response Rate as a Function of Magnitude and Schedule of Heat Reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (1p1):74.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  9
    Douglas R. May, Cuifang Li, Jennifer Mencl & Ching-Chu Huang (2014). The Ethics of Meaningful Work: Types and Magnitude of Job-Related Harm and the Ethical Decision-Making Process. Journal of Business Ethics 121 (4):651-669.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  3
    John R. Platt & Robert A. Gay (1968). Differential Magnitude of Reward Conditioning as a Function of Predifferential Reward Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (3p1):393.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  5
    Winfred F. Hill, John W. Cotton & Keith N. Clayton (1962). Effect of Reward Magnitude, Percentage of Reinforcement, and Training Method on Acquisition and Reversal in a T Maze. Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):81.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  3
    F. Nowell Jones, David Singer & Paul A. Twelker (1962). Interactions Among the Somesthetic Senses in Judgments of Subjective Magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):105.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  2
    Shirley C. Peeke & William W. Grings (1968). Magnitude of Ucr as a Function of Variability in the Cs-Ucs Relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):64.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  1
    Philip J. Dunham & Bernard Kilps (1969). Shifts in Magnitude of Reinforcement: Confounded Factors or Contrast Effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):373.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  1
    H. Wayne Ludvigson (1968). Interaction of Midchain Detention and Reward Magnitude in Instrumental Conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1):70.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32.  7
    Norman E. Spear & William B. Pavlik (1966). Percentage of Reinforcement and Reward Magnitude Effects in a T Maze: Between and Within Subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):521.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  1
    Alfred Lit (1960). The Magnitude of the Pulfrich Stereophenomenon as a Function of Target Velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (3):165.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  5
    I.-Ning Huang (1969). Successive Contrast Effects as a Function of Type and Magnitude of Reward. Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (1p1):64.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  5
    E. G. Wever & C. W. Bray (1936). The Nature of Acoustic Response: The Relation Between Sound Intensity and the Magnitude of Responses in the Cochlea. Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (2):129.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  3
    Brant Clark & John D. Stewart (1968). Magnitude Estimates of Rotational Velocity During and Following Prolonged Increasing, Constant, and Zero Angular Acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):329.
  37.  3
    James R. Ison, David H. Glass & Helen B. Daly (1969). Reward Magnitude Changes Following Differential Conditioning and Partial Reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):81.
  38.  4
    Arthur L. Miller & Richard Sheldon (1969). Magnitude Estimation of Average Length and Average Inclination. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):16.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  4
    Richard D. Parsons (1970). Magnitude Estimates of the Oculogyral Illusion During and Following Angular Acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):230.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  2
    F. Nowell Jones & Morris J. Woskow (1966). Some Effects of Context on the Slope in Magnitude Estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):177.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  3
    Harvard L. Armus (1959). Effect of Magnitude of Reinforcement on Acquisition and Extinction of a Running Response. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1):61.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Henry Goldstein & Kenneth W. Spence (1963). Performance in Differential Conditioning as a Function of Variation in Magnitude of Reward. Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):86.
  43.  4
    Carrell A. Dammann & Charles C. Perkins Jr (1969). Duration of Antecedent Discriminative Stimuli and Within-Subject Reward Magnitude Differences as Determiners of Running Speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):554.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  3
    Dwight W. Curtis & Stanley J. Rule (1972). Magnitude Judgments of Brightness and Brightness Difference as a Function of Background Reflectance. Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (1):215.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  3
    John R. McKinnon & Abram Amsel (1964). Magnitude of the Frustration Effect as a Function of Confinement and Detention in the Frustrating Situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (5):468.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  2
    Vincent Di Lollo & James Allison (1971). Relative Magnitude of End-Box Reward: Effects Upon Performance Throughout the Double Runway. Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (2):248.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  2
    Harry G. Yamaguchi (1961). The Effect of Continuous, Partial, and Varied Magnitude Reinforcement on Acquisition and Extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):319.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  2
    Winfred F. Hill & Norman E. Spear (1962). Resistance to Extinction as a Joint Function of Reward Magnitude and the Spacing of Extinction Trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (6):636.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  2
    James H. McHose & H. Wayne Ludvigson (1965). Role of Reward Magnitude and Incomplete Reduction of Reward Magnitude in the Frustration Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (5):490.
  50.  2
    Egli Efstathiou (1969). Effects of Exposure Time and Magnitude of Prism Transform on Eye-Hand Coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (2):235.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 805