20 found
Sort by:
  1. Mane Hajdin (2011). Comments Onf Alan Soble's Pornography, Sex, and Feminism. In Adrianne Leigh McEvoy (ed.), Sex, Love, and Friendship: Studies of the Society for the Philosophy of Sex and Love: 1993-2003. Rodopi.
  2. Mane Hajdin (2010). Joseph Mendola, Goodness and Justice: A Consequentialist Moral Theory Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 27 (3):204-206.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mane Hajdin (2009). David Boonin, The Problem of Punishment. Philosophy in Review 29 (1):7.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Mane Hajdin (2007). The Case Against Punishment: Retribution, Crime Prevention, and the Law. Dialogue 46 (2):402-404.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mane Hajdin (2007). The Case Against Punishment: Retribution, Crime Prevention, and the Law Deirdre Golash New York: New York University Press, 2005, Ix + 219 Pp. [REVIEW] Dialogue 46 (02):402-.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Mane Hajdin (2005). Employee Loyalty: An Examination. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 59 (3):259 - 280.
    . This article presents and examines four different reconstructions of Ronald Duska’s argument for the thesis that employees’ loyalty to their employers is misguided. One of them is the reconstruction presented by John Corvino in this journal. The remaining three revolve around, respectively, employers’ failure to reciprocate employees’ (attempts at) loyalty, the commercial character of employment, and the instrumental character of employment. The result of the examination is that the argument does not withstand scrutiny in any of the four reconstructions. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Mane Hajdin (2002). Affirmative Action, Old and New. Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (1):83–96.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Mane Hajdin (1998). Fred Feldman, Utilitarianism, Hedonism, and Desert. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 18:254-256.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Mane Hajdin (1997). Geoffrey Scarre, Utilitarianism Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 17 (5):367-368.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Mane Hajdin (1997). Geoffrey Scarre, Utilitarianism. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 17:367-368.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Mane Hajdin (1997). Sexual Harassment and Negligence. Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (1):37-53.
  12. Linda LeMoncheck & Mane Hajdin (1997). Sexual Harassment: A Debate. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Mane Hajdin (1994). The Boundaries of Moral Discourse. Loyola University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Mane Hajdin (1994). Sexual Harassment in the Law: The Demarcation Problem. Journal of Social Philosophy 25 (3):102-122.
  15. Mane Hajdin (1993). Sanctions and the Notion of Morality. Dialogue 32 (04):757-.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Mane Hajdin (1992). External Reasons and the Foundations of Morality: Mother Teresa Vs. Thrasymachus. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 26 (3):433-441.
  17. Mane Hajdin (1991). Is There More to Speech Acts Than Illocutionary Force and Propositional Content? Noûs 25 (3):353-357.
  18. Mane Hajdin (1990). External and Now-For-Then Preferences in Hare's Theory. Dialogue 29 (02):305-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Mane Hajdin (1988). Agents, Patients, and Moral Discourse. Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada)
    Assuming that moral discourse is prescriptive, what distinguishes it from other types of prescriptive discourse? To say, as Hare does, that it is its overridingness, is subject both to criticisms that assume that overridingness could, in principle, be used to distinguish one type of prescriptive discourse from another, and then show that it is doubtful that moral discourse is overriding, and to the criticisms that claim that it is in principle impossible to use overridingness to distinguish one type of prescriptive (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Mane Hajdin (1987). Criminals as Gamblers: A Modified Theory of Pure Restitution. Dialogue 26 (01):77-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation