13 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: María Cerezo (Universidad de Murcia)
  1. Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe & María Cerezo (forthcoming). Truth and Bivalence in Aristotle. An Investigation Into the Structure of Saying. In N. Öffenberger & A. Vigo (eds.), Iberoamerikanische Beiträge zur modernen Deutung der Aristotelischen Logik. Olms.
    The aim of this paper is rather modest: we do not intend to reconstruct Aristotle’s theory of truth (although we are convinced that there is such a thing), and we will not try to settle the issue concerning Bivalence in Aristotle. We merely want, on the one hand, to argue for the consistency between the main Aristotelian texts on truth and a possible rejection of Bivalence; and on the other hand, to investigate the conditions of a possible counterexample to Bivalence. (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. María Cerezo (2013). Remarks on the Interest-Relative Theory of Vagueness. Acta Analytica 28 (3):381-394.
    I discuss the interest-relative account of vagueness and argue for a distinction between relational vague predicates and non-relational vague predicates depending on the kind of properties expressed by them. The strategy rests on three arguments arising from the existence of clear cases of a vague predicate, from contexts in which a different answer is required for questions about whether a vague predicate applies to an item, and whether such an item satisfies the interest of an agent, and from cases where (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. María Cerezo (2012). Possibility and Logical Space in the Tractatus. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (5):645-659.
    Abstract This paper discusses some recent work on the notion of possibility in Wittgenstein's Tractatus assessed by means of an interpretation of the notion put forward in Cerezo 2005. It argues that the proper way to understand the notion of possibility in the Tractatus must pay equal attention both to the picture theory and the truth-functions theory. From this perspective, through an examination of Peach's proposal (2007) it shows that the role played by the notion of logical space in the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. María Cerezo (2011). Vaguedad. In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta. 621--624.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. María Cerezo (2007). Young Ludwig: Wittgenstein's Life 1889–1921. Review of Metaphysics 61 (2):434-436.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Thomas E. Brown, Maria Cerezo, Earl Conee, Theodore Sider, John Cottingham & Sandra M. Dingli (2006). Appearance in This List Neither Guarantees nor Precludes a Future Review of the Book. Albus, James S., and Alexander M. Meystel, Engineering of Mind: An Introduction to the Science of Intelligent Systems, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001, Pp. Xv+ 411,£ 57.50 Aristotle, Translated by Glen Coughlin, Physics, Or Natural Hearing, South Bend, Indi. [REVIEW] Mind 115:457.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. María Cerezo (2005). The Possibility of Language: Internal Tensions in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    In this volume, Mar[]5ia Cerezo examines Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus as a response to some of Frege's and Russel's logical problems. In analyzing the tractarian conditions for the possibility of language, she explains the two main theories of the proposition in Tractatus : the truth-functions theory and the picture theory. Cerezo shows that Wittgenstein initially separates the account of the structure of a proposition from the explanation of its expression. However, contrary to his intention, the combination of these theories creates new (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. María Cerezo (2004). Las Nociones de Sachverhalt, Tatsache y Sachlage En El "Tractatus" de Wittgenstein. Anuario Filosófico 37 (79):455-482.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. María Cerezo (1998). Nombrar Kripkeano Versus Nombrar Tractariano: Un Intento de Demarcación (Tractarian Naming Versus Kripkean Naming: Similarities and Differences). Theoria 13 (3):427-444.
    Raymond Bradley ha ofrecido una interpretacion esencialista de la ontologia deI Tractatus Logico Philosophicus de Wittgenstein (R. Bradley, The Nature of All Being, 1992), en la que pretende desarrollar las dimensiones modales que en su opinión estan implícitas en el Tractatus. EI proposito de este trabajo es revisar la interpretación bradleyana de los nombres tractarianos corno designadores rígidos, examinando la noción tractariana de nombre y la kripkeana de designador rigido en Naming and Necessity, con un doble objetivo: contestar a la (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Ignacio Angelelli & María Cerezo (eds.) (1996). Studies on the History of Logic: Proceedings of the Iii. Symposium on the History of Logic. Walter De Gruyter.
  11. María Cerezo (1995). The Nature of All Being: A Study of Wittgenstein's Modal Atomism. Theoria 10 (2):237-238.
  12. María Cerezo & Ángel D'Ors (1995). Tractatus 5.54-5.5423": Sobre Los "Enunciados de Creencia. Anuario Filosófico 28 (2):269-310.
    This paper examines the analysis of judgements of belief that Wittgenstein offers in 5.54-5.5423 of the Tractatus. We offer an interpretation of these paragraphs wich also pays attention to 5.5423, usually forgotten. In our opinion, this interpretation fits with Wittgenstein's doctrines, and makes clear that such non-genuine propositions are nonsense. These are not, as has sometimes been proposed, the propositions of psychology. In the second part of the article we give a detailed discussion of interpretations of these paragraphs which have (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ángel D'ors & María Cerezo (1995). Tractatus 5.54-5.5423: Sobre Los llamados. Anuario Filosófico 28:269-310.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation