8 found
Sort by:
  1. María L. Lukac de Stier (2011). A Note From the Editor. Hobbes Studies 24 (1):1-3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. María L. Lukac de Stier (2011). Hobbes on the Passions and Imagination: Tradition and Modernity. Hobbes Studies 24 (1):78-90.
    This article introduces the doctrine of the passions in the Hobbesian work, showing its debt with tradition, especially the scholastic Aristotelian one, even if, at the same time, it offers some breach features with this tradition, which are also analysed. In addition, the fundamentals of imagination manifest themselves in the appetitive process, in Hobbes's doctrine as well as in the scholastic Aristotelian tradition, showing their similarities and differences.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. María L. Lukac de Stier (2011). La antropología tomista de Guillermo Blanco. Sapientia 67 (229):273-280.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. María L. Lukac de Stier & Omar Astorga (2011). Brill Online Books and Journals. Hobbes Studies 24 (1).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. María L. Lukac de Stier (2002). The Notion of Good in Hobbes' System. Hobbes Studies 15 (1):87-99.
    Generally, the topic of Hobbes's ethics that has received little attention is the "good"1, probably because the critical viewpoint has almost always been from politics and social philosophy; their focus is the justification of rules, obligation, the relationship between natural law and civil law and so on. This paper intends to consider different approaches to the theme of "good" given in the complete works of Hobbes, and not just the politically focused works, to explain the apparent contradictions.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Maria L. Lukac De Stier (1997). Hobbes on Authority De Cive and Leviathan : A Comparison. Hobbes Studies 10 (1):51-67.
    The primary purpose of this paper is to show the change in the notion of authority as reflected in Leviathan with respect to De Cive on account of the inclusion, in the former, of the concept of authorization. This notion, which had not appeared in either De Cive or Elements of Law, introduces a new way of conceiving of sovereignty, of power and even of the view on the Kingdom of God. In this paper I will also undertake an analysis, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Maria L. Lukac De Stier (1993). Individual Egoism as Motivation for Human Praxis. Hobbes Studies 6 (1):43-57.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Maria L. Lukac de Stier (1987). Theoretical and Practical Knowledge in Hobbes and Thomas Aquinas. New Scholasticism 61 (1):1-12.