5 found
  1.  42
    Marcel Quarfood (2006). Kant on Biological Teleology: Towards a Two-Level Interpretation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (4):735-747.
    Kant stresses the regulative status of teleological attributions, but sometimes he seems to treat teleology as a constitutive condition for biology. To clarify this issue, the concept of natural purpose and its role for biology are examined. I suggest that the concept serves an identificatory function: it singles out objects as natural purposes, whereby the special science of biology is constituted. This relative constitutivity of teleology is explicated by means of a distinction of levels: on the object level of biological (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  2.  2
    Marcel Quarfood (2013). Interpretations of Kantian Disjunctive Judgment in Propositional Logic. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltb├╝rgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 307-320.
  3.  1
    Marcel Quarfood (2014). The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment: What It Is and How It Is Solved. In Eric Watkins & Ina Goy (eds.), Kant's Theory of Biology. De Gruyter 167-184.
  4.  24
    Marcel Quarfood (1999). The Individuality of Species: Some Reflections on the Debate. Synthese 120 (1):89-94.
    The thesis that species are individuals, and not classes as the traditional view had it, has been influential in the last 25 years. In this paper David Hull's arguments for the thesis are surveyed, as well as some counterarguments presented by Philip Kitcher. It is claimed that though species can be conceptualized as individuals, we are not compelled to view them in that way. The importance of the issue seems to have been somewhat exaggerated. However, it might happen that empirical (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  5.  1
    Marcel Quarfood (2004). Kant,'Grundlegung III', the Deduction of the Categorical Imperative. Kant-Studien 95:392-396.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography