9 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Marcello Frixione (Università degli Studi di Genova)
  1. Marcello Frixione & Antonio Lieto (2013). Dealing with Concepts: From Cognitive Psychology to Knowledge Representation. Frontiers of Psychological and Behevioural Science 2 (3):96-106.
    Concept representation is still an open problem in the field of ontology engineering and, more generally, of knowledge representation. In particular, the issue of representing “non classical” concepts, i.e. concepts that cannot be defined in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions, remains unresolved. In this paper we review empirical evidence from cognitive psychology, according to which concept representation is not a unitary phenomenon. On this basis, we sketch some proposals for concept representation, taking into account suggestions from psychological research. In (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Marcello Frixione & Antonio Lieto (2012). Representing Concepts in Formal Ontologies: Compositionality Vs. Typicality Effects&Quot;,. Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 ( Logic, Reasoning and Rationalit):391-414.
    The problem of concept representation is relevant for many sub-fields of cognitive research, including psychology and philosophy, as well as artificial intelligence. In particular, in recent years it has received a great deal of attention within the field of knowledge representation, due to its relevance for both knowledge engineering as well as ontology-based technologies. However, the notion of a concept itself turns out to be highly disputed and problematic. In our opinion, one of the causes of this state of affairs (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Marcello Frixione (2011). Art, the Brain, and Family Resemblances: Some Considerations on Neuroaesthetics. Philosophical Psychology 24 (5):699 - 715.
    The project of neuroaesthetics could be interpreted as an attempt to identify a ?neural essence? of art, i.e., a set of necessary and sufficient conditions formulated in the language of neuroscience, which define the concept art . Some proposals developed within this field can be read in this way. I shall argue that such attempts do not succeed in individuating a neural definition of art. Of course, the fact that the proposals available for defining art in neural terms do not (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Alessandro Dell’Anna & Marcello Frixione (2010). On the Advantage (If Any) and Disadvantage of the Conceptual/Nonconceptual Distinction for Cognitive Science. Minds and Machines 20 (1):29-45.
    In this article we question the utility of the distinction between conceptual and nonconceptual content in cognitive science, and in particular, in the empirical study of visual perception. First, we individuate some difficulties in characterizing the notion of “concept” itself both in the philosophy of mind and cognitive science. Then we stress the heterogeneous nature of the notion of nonconceptual content and outline the complex and ambiguous relations that exist between the conceptual/nonconceptual duality and other pairs of notions, such as (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Roberto Cordeschi & Marcello Frixione (2007). Computationalism Under Attack. In M. Marraffa, M. De Caro & F. Ferretti (eds.), Cartographies of the Mind: Philosophy and Psychology in Intersection. Springer.
    Since the early eighties, computationalism in the study of the mind has been “under attack” by several critics of the so-called “classic” or “symbolic” approaches in AI and cognitive science. Computationalism was generically identified with such approaches. For example, it was identified with both Allen Newell and Herbert Simon’s Physical Symbol System Hypothesis and Jerry Fodor’s theory of Language of Thought, usually without taking into account the fact ,that such approaches are very different as to their methods and aims. Zenon (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Marcello Frixione (2007). Come Ragioniamo. Laterza.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Marcello Frixione (2001). Tractable Competence. Minds and Machines 11 (3):379-397.
    In the study of cognitive processes, limitations on computational resources (computing time and memory space) are usually considered to be beyond the scope of a theory of competence, and to be exclusively relevant to the study of performance. Starting from considerations derived from the theory of computational complexity, in this paper I argue that there are good reasons for claiming that some aspects of resource limitations pertain to the domain of a theory of competence.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Marcello Frixione (1996). Teoria del significato e scienze cognitive: verso una semantica naturalizzata. Iride: Filosofia E Discussione Pubblica 9:169.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Marcello Frixione & Dario Palladino (1993). Logica Epistemica, Onniscienza Logica E Intelligenza Artificiale. Epistemologia 16:311-340.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation