23 found
Sort by:
  1. Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenburg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin (eds.) (forthcoming). Kant-Lexikon. De Gruyter.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Claudia Blöser, Mikae Janvid, Hannes Ole Matthiessen & Marcus Willaschek (eds.) (2013). Defeasibility in Philosophy: Knowledge, Agency, Responsibility, and the Law. Editions Rodopi.
    Defeasibility, most generally speaking, means that given some set of conditions A, something else B will hold, unless or until defeating conditions C apply. While the term was introduced into philosophy by legal philosopher H.L.A. Hart in 1949, today, the concept of defeasibility is employed in many different areas of philosophy. This volume for the first time brings together contributions on defeasibility from epistemology (Mikael Janvid, Klemens Kappel, Hannes Ole Matthiessen, Marcus Willaschek, Michael Williams), legal philosophy (Frederick Schauer) and ethics (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Marcus Willaschek (ed.) (2013). Disjunctivism: Disjunctive Accounts in Epistemology and in the Philosophy of Perception. Routledge.
    Does perception provide us with direct and unmediated access to the world around us? The so-called 'argument from illusion ' has traditionally been supposed to show otherwise: from the subject's point of view, perceptual illusions are often indistinguishable from veridical perceptions; hence, perceptual experience, as such, cannot provide us with knowledge of the world, but only with knowledge of how things appear to us. Disjunctive accounts of perceptual experience, first proposed by John McDowell and Paul Snowdon in the early 1980s (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Marcus Willaschek (2012). The Non-Derivability of Kantian Right From the Categorical Imperative: A Response to Nance. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (4):557-564.
    (2012). The Non-Derivability of Kantian Right from the Categorical Imperative: A Response to Nance. International Journal of Philosophical Studies: Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 557-564.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Marcus Willaschek (2011). Introduction: Symposium on Disjunctivism: Part One. Philosophical Explorations 13 (3):169-171.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Claudia Blöser, Aron Schöpf & Marcus Willaschek (2010). Autonomy, Experience, and Reflection. On a Neglected Aspect of Personal Autonomy. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):239 - 253.
    The aim of this paper is to suggest that a necessary condition of autonomy has not been sufficiently recognized in the literature: the capacity to critically reflect on one’s practical attitudes (desires, preferences, values, etc.) in the light of new experiences . It will be argued that most prominent accounts of autonomy—ahistorical as well as history-sensitive—have either altogether failed to recognize this condition or at least failed to give an explicit account of it.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Marcus Willaschek (2010). Non-Relativist Contextualism About Free Will. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):567-587.
    Abstract: Contextualist accounts of free will recently proposed by Hawthorne and Rieber imply that the same action can be both free and unfree (depending on the attributor's context). This paradoxical consequence can be avoided by thinking of contexts not as constituted by arbitrary moves in a conversation, but rather by (relatively stable) social practices (such as the practices of attributing responsibility or of giving scientific explanations). The following two conditions are suggested as each necessary and jointly sufficient for free will: (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Marcus Willaschek (2010). The Primacy of Practical Reason and the Idea of a Practical Postulate. In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Marcus Willaschek (2009). Möglichkeiten und Fähigkeiten. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 57 (1):141-148.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Marcus Willaschek (2009). Right and Coercion: Can Kant's Conception of Right Be Derived From His Moral Theory? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):49 – 70.
    Recently, there has been some discussion about the relationship between Kant's conception of right (the sphere of juridical rights and duties) and his moral theory (with the Categorical Imperative as its fundamental norm). In section 1, I briefly survey some recent contributions to this debate and distinguish between two different questions. First, does Kant's moral theory (as developed in the Groundwork and the Critique of Practical Reason ) imply , or validate, a Kantian conception of right (as developed in the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Marcus Willaschek (2008). Freedom and Reason Why is Incompatibility Based on an Absolute Conception of Reason? Philosophisches Jahrbuch 115 (2):397-417.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Marcus Willaschek (2008). Freiheit und Vernunft-: Weshalb der Inkompatibilismus auf einer absolutistischen Konzeption von Vernunft beruht. Philosophisches Jahrbuch 115 (2):397-417.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Marcus Willaschek (2007). Contextualism About Knowledge and Justification by Default. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):251-272.
    This paper develops a non-relativist version of contextualism about knowledge. It is argued that a plausible contextualism must take into account three features of our practice of attributing knowledge: (1) knowledge-attributions follow a default-and-challenge pattern; (2) there are preconditions for a belief's enjoying the status of being justified by default (e.g. being orthodox); and (3) for an error-possibility to be a serious challenge, there has to be positive evidence that the possibility might be realized in the given situation. It is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Alexander Bagattini & Marcus Willaschek (2006). John McDowell by Maximilian de Gaynesford and John McDowell by Tim Thornton. Philosophical Books 47 (3):281-284.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Marcus Willaschek (2002). Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-Prescriptive Character of Juridicial Laws in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals. In Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Clarendon Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Marcus Willaschek (2000). Einleitung: Die neuere Realismusdebatte in der analytischen Philosophie. In , Realismus. Ferdinand Schöningh Verlag. 9--32.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Marcus Willaschek (ed.) (2000). Realismus. Ferdinand Schöningh Verlag.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Marcus Willaschek (2000). Wissen, Zweifel, Kontext. Eine kontextualistische Zurückweisung des Skeptizismus. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 54 (2):151 - 172.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Marcus Willaschek (1998). Agency, Autonomy, and Moral Obligation. In Christoph Fehige & Ulla Wessels (eds.), Preferences. De Gruyter. 19--176.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Marcus Willaschek (1998). Skeptical Challenge and the Burden of Proof: On Rescher's Critique of Skepticism. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 64:203-221.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Marcus Willaschek (1997). Der transzendentale Idealismus und die Idealität von Raum und Zeit. Eine 'lückenlose' Interpretation von Kants Beweis in der "Transzendentalen Ästhetik". Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 51 (4):537 - 564.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Marcus Willaschek (1997). Review: Kant und die Philosophie des Geistes: Zu neuen Büchern über Geist und Subjekt bei Kant. [REVIEW] Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 51 (3):471 - 485.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Marcus Willaschek (1996). Die Wiedererlangung der Welt als Gegenstand der Erfahrung. Bemerkungen zu John McDowells Mind and World. Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 21:163-174.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation