34 found
Sort by:
  1. Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenburg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin (eds.) (forthcoming). Kant-Lexikon. De Gruyter.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Claudia Blöser, Mikae Janvid, Hannes Ole Matthiessen & Marcus Willaschek (eds.) (2013). Defeasibility in Philosophy: Knowledge, Agency, Responsibility, and the Law. Editions Rodopi.
    Defeasibility, most generally speaking, means that given some set of conditions A, something else B will hold, unless or until defeating conditions C apply. While the term was introduced into philosophy by legal philosopher H.L.A. Hart in 1949, today, the concept of defeasibility is employed in many different areas of philosophy. This volume for the first time brings together contributions on defeasibility from epistemology , legal philosophy and ethics and the philosophy of action . The volume ends with an extensive (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Marcus Willaschek (ed.) (2013). Disjunctivism: Disjunctive Accounts in Epistemology and in the Philosophy of Perception. Routledge.
    Does perception provide us with direct and unmediated access to the world around us? The so-called 'argument from illusion ' has traditionally been supposed to show otherwise: from the subject's point of view, perceptual illusions are often indistinguishable from veridical perceptions; hence, perceptual experience, as such, cannot provide us with knowledge of the world, but only with knowledge of how things appear to us. Disjunctive accounts of perceptual experience, first proposed by John McDowell and Paul Snowdon in the early 1980s (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Marcus Willaschek (2013). Kant’s Two Conceptions of Reason in the Critique of Pure Reason. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. 483-492.
  5. Marcus Willaschek (2012). The Non-Derivability of Kantian Right From the Categorical Imperative: A Response to Nance. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (4):557-564.
    (2012). The Non-Derivability of Kantian Right from the Categorical Imperative: A Response to Nance. International Journal of Philosophical Studies: Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 557-564.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Marcus Willaschek (2011). Introduction: Symposium on Disjunctivism: Part One. Philosophical Explorations 13 (3):169-171.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Claudia Blöser, Aron Schöpf & Marcus Willaschek (2010). Autonomy, Experience, and Reflection. On a Neglected Aspect of Personal Autonomy. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (3):239 - 253.
    The aim of this paper is to suggest that a necessary condition of autonomy has not been sufficiently recognized in the literature: the capacity to critically reflect on one’s practical attitudes (desires, preferences, values, etc.) in the light of new experiences . It will be argued that most prominent accounts of autonomy—ahistorical as well as history-sensitive—have either altogether failed to recognize this condition or at least failed to give an explicit account of it.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Marcus Willaschek (2010). Non-Relativist Contextualism About Free Will. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):567-587.
    Abstract: Contextualist accounts of free will recently proposed by Hawthorne and Rieber imply that the same action can be both free and unfree (depending on the attributor's context). This paradoxical consequence can be avoided by thinking of contexts not as constituted by arbitrary moves in a conversation, but rather by (relatively stable) social practices (such as the practices of attributing responsibility or of giving scientific explanations). The following two conditions are suggested as each necessary and jointly sufficient for free will: (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Marcus Willaschek (2010). The Primacy of Practical Reason and the Idea of a Practical Postulate. In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Marcus Willaschek (2009). Möglichkeiten und Fähigkeiten. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 57 (1):141-148.
    In his book Willensfreiheit , Geert Keil argues against the compatibility of free will and determinism by starting from the claim that the possibility to do otherwise than one actually does is an „analytic component“ of the concept of action. This he takes to imply that at no point in time prior to the action it is determined whether the action will take place. I argue against the move from to by pointing out that the kind of possibility mentioned in (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Marcus Willaschek (2009). Right and Coercion: Can Kant's Conception of Right Be Derived From His Moral Theory? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):49 – 70.
    Recently, there has been some discussion about the relationship between Kant's conception of right (the sphere of juridical rights and duties) and his moral theory (with the Categorical Imperative as its fundamental norm). In section 1, I briefly survey some recent contributions to this debate and distinguish between two different questions. First, does Kant's moral theory (as developed in the Groundwork and the Critique of Practical Reason ) imply , or validate, a Kantian conception of right (as developed in the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Marcus Willaschek (2008). Freedom and Reason Why is Incompatibility Based on an Absolute Conception of Reason? Philosophisches Jahrbuch 115 (2):397-417.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Marcus Willaschek (2008). Freiheit und Vernunft-: Weshalb der Inkompatibilismus auf einer absolutistischen Konzeption von Vernunft beruht. Philosophisches Jahrbuch 115 (2):397-417.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Marcus Willaschek (2007). Contextualism About Knowledge and Justification by Default. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):251-272.
    This paper develops a non-relativist version of contextualism about knowledge. It is argued that a plausible contextualism must take into account three features of our practice of attributing knowledge: (1) knowledge-attributions follow a default-and-challenge pattern; (2) there are preconditions for a belief's enjoying the status of being justified by default (e.g. being orthodox); and (3) for an error-possibility to be a serious challenge, there has to be positive evidence that the possibility might be realized in the given situation. It is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Alexander Bagattini & Marcus Willaschek (2006). John McDowell by Maximilian de Gaynesford and John McDowell by Tim Thornton. Philosophical Books 47 (3):281-284.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Marcus Willaschek (2002). Which Imperatives for Right? On the Non-Prescriptive Character of Juridicial Laws in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals. In Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Clarendon Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Marcus Willaschek (2001). Wahrheit und Wissen. [REVIEW] Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 55 (1).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John Henry Mcdowell & Marcus Willaschek (2000). John Mcdowell, Reason and Nature Lecture and Colloquium in Münster 1999.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Marcus Willaschek (2000). Einleitung: Die neuere Realismusdebatte in der analytischen Philosophie. In Realismus. Ferdinand Schöningh Verlag. 9--32.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Marcus Willaschek (ed.) (2000). Realismus. Ferdinand Schöningh Verlag.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Marcus Willaschek (2000). Wissen, Zweifel, Kontext. Eine kontextualistische Zurückweisung des Skeptizismus. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 54 (2):151 - 172.
    Unter „Skeptizismus" wird hier die Auffassung verstanden, daß unsere Meinungen, selbst wenn sie zufälligerweise wahr sein sollten, sind niemals gut genug begründet, um als Wissen gelten zu können. Die „kontextualistische" Reaktion auf den Skeptizismus beruht auf dem Gedanken, daß die Berechtigung von Wissensansprüchen u.a. vom jeweiligen Kontext abhängt, in dem sie erhoben werden. Diese Auffassung findet sich in unterschiedlicher Form zum Beispiel bei Peirce, Austin, dem späten Wittgenstein und, unter den neueren Autoren, bei Michael Williams, David Lewis und Hilary Putnam. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Georg Mohr & Marcus Willaschek (1999). Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 61 (3):595-596.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Marcus Willaschek (1998). Agency, Autonomy, and Moral Obligation. In Christoph Fehige & Ulla Wessels (eds.), Preferences. De Gruyter. 19--176.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Marcus Willaschek (1998). Phaenomena/Noumena und die Amphibolie der Reflexionsbegriffe. In Georg Mohr & Marcus Willaschek (eds.), Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Akademie. 325-351.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Marcus Willaschek (1998). Skeptical Challenge and the Burden of Proof: On Rescher's Critique of Skepticism. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 64:203-221.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Marcus Willaschek (1997). Der transzendentale Idealismus und die Idealität von Raum und Zeit. Eine 'lückenlose' Interpretation von Kants Beweis in der "Transzendentalen Ästhetik". Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 51 (4):537-564.
    In der "Transzendentalen Ästhetik" der KrV will Kant zeigen, daß Raum und Zeit Anschauungsformen und daher keine Eigenschaften der Dinge an sich sind. Es scheint jedoch, als übersehe er dabei die Möglichkeit, daß Raum und Zeit Anschauungsformen und zugleich Eigenschaften der Dinge an sich sein könnten. Dagegen soll hier gezeigt werden, daß Kants Beweis durchaus schlüssig ist. Dabei kommt es zunächst darauf an, die genaue Struktur des Kantischen Beweises zu verstehen. Darauf folgt eine Diskussion der Kantischen Begriffe Anschauung sowie Form (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Marcus Willaschek (1997). Ernst Tugendhat Moralbegründung Und Gerechtigkeit : Vortrag Und Kolloquium in Münster 1997.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Marcus Willaschek (1997). Kant und die Philosophie des Geistes. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 51 (3).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Marcus Willaschek (1997). Review: Kant und die Philosophie des Geistes: Zu neuen Büchern über Geist und Subjekt bei Kant. [REVIEW] Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 51 (3):471 - 485.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Marcus Willaschek (1997). Why The Doctrine Of Right Does Not Belong In The Metaphysics Of Morals. Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 5.
    Der Aufsatz behandelt den Zusammenhang zwischen Recht, Ethik und Moral in der MdS. Ausgangspunkt ist der Befund, daß Kants System der Pflichten in der MdS weder konsistent noch vollständig ist, weil Rechts- und Tugendpflichten, entgegen Kants Annahme, den Bereich der moralischen Pflichten nicht erschöpfen . Kants System der Pflichten beruht auf den Unterscheidungen zwischen Recht und Ethik und zwischen Legalität und Moralität. Letztere konzipiert Kant in der MdS anders als in früheren Werken, indem er sie nun auf die beiden Arten (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Marcus Willaschek (1996). Die Wiedererlangung der Welt als Gegenstand der Erfahrung. Bemerkungen zu John McDowells Mind and World. Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 21 (2):163-174.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Marcus Willaschek (1995). Keine Lösung des "Geist-Gehirn-Problems": Zu Roths und Schweglers "nicht-reduktionistischem Physikalismus". Ethik Und Sozialwissenschaften 6 (1):144.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Marcus Willaschek (1993). Rezension. [REVIEW] Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 47 (4):642-644.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Marcus Willaschek (1992). Praktische Vernunft Handlungstheorie Und Moralbegrèundung Bei Kant. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation