Search results for 'Maria L. Talero' (try it on Scholar)

6 found
Sort by:
  1. Maria L. Talero (2008). The Experiential Workspace and the Limits of Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (3):453 – 472.score: 290.0
    In this paper, I develop the notion of the experiential workspace, or the phenomenal setting generated by the coupling between the enactive body and its affordance-laden environment, in order to carry out a fine-grained analysis of enactive experiential phenomena, in particular those of ordinary lived experience. My purpose is to shed light on some of the ways that empirical methodologies are intrinsically limited in their ability to capture the native phenomena of enactive, embodied experience. (...) Drawing on the work of Merleau-Ponty, I argue that the experiential workspace is characterized by dynamic mutability, emergent norms, and epistemic openness - characteristics that are transphenomenal in nature and thus resistant to empirical measurement. Using concepts from the work of developmental psychologist Lev Vygotsky (1978) and feminist philosopher Iris Marion Young (1998), I will show how our embeddedness in an intersubjective world makes the experiential workspace a mercurial, labile phenomenon, characterized by inherently transphenomenal features that are resistant to naturalistic analysis or modelling. (shrink)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Maria Talero (2005). Perception, Normativity, and Selfhood in Merleau-Ponty: The Spatial 'Level' and Existential Space. Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):443-461.score: 120.0
  3. Maria Talero (2006). Intersubjectivity and Intermodal Perception. Chiasmi International 8:175-188.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Maria Talero (2006). Merleau-Ponty and the Bodily Subject of Learning. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):191-203.score: 120.0
    In the philosophy of Merleau-Ponty, learning is not a paradox, as suggested by Plato’s Meno, but the fundamental form of experience. To experience is precisely to be permeable and open to being reshaped by one’s experiences. I explore the reconceptualization of the human subject within Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy that allows us to understand how the body-subject can be a learning subject. Fundamentally this involves consideration of the nature of habit, and the way in which habit simultaneously locks us into a repressiveattachment (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Maria Talero (2006). Résumé: Intersubjectivité et perception intermodale. Chiasmi International 8:189-189.score: 120.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Maria Talero (2006). Riassunto: Intersoggetività e percezione intermodale. Chiasmi International 8:189-189.score: 120.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation