5 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Marilyn Ford [4]Marilyn Sue Ford [1]
  1. Marilyn Ford (2005). Human Nonmonotonic Reasoning: The Importance of Seeing the Logical Strength of Arguments. Synthese 146 (1-2):71 - 92.
    Three studies of human nonmonotonic reasoning are described. The results show that people find such reasoning quite difficult, although being given problems with known subclass-superclass relationships is helpful. The results also show that recognizing differences in the logical strengths of arguments is important for the nonmonotonic problems studied. For some of these problems, specificity – which is traditionally considered paramount in drawing appropriate conclusions – was irrelevant and so should have lead to a “can’t tell” response; however, people could give (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Marilyn Ford (1995). Two Modes of Mental Representation and Problem Solution in Syllogistic Reasoning. Cognition 54 (1):1-71.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Maria J. Meyerson, Marilyn Sue Ford, W. Paul Jones & Mary Ann Ward (1991). Science Vocabulary Knowledge of Third and Fifth Grade Students. Science Education 75 (4):419-428.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Marilyn Ford & Mary Dalrymple (1988). A Note on Some Psychological Evidence and Alternative Grammars. Cognition 29 (1):63-71.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Marilyn Ford & Virginia M. Holmes (1978). Planning Units and Syntax in Sentence Production. Cognition 6 (1):35-53.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation