8 found
Sort by:
  1. Mario Brandhorst (2015). Correspondence to Reality in Ethics. Philosophical Investigations 38 (3):227-250.
    This paper examines the view of ethical language that Wittgenstein took in later years. It argues that according to this view, ethics falls into place as a part of our natural history, while every sense of the mystical or supernatural that once surrounded it is irrevocably lost. Moreover, Wittgenstein argues that ethical language does not correspond to reality “in the way” in which a physical theory does. I propose an interpretation of this claim that shows how it sets his view (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Mario Brandhorst (2013). Über das Recht, aus Menschenliebe zu lügen. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 75-86.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mario Brandhorst (2013). Nietzsche, Naturalism, and Normativity. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (6):1237-1240.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Mario Brandhorst (2013). Nietzsches Wissenschaftsphilosophie: Hintergründe, Wirkungen Und Aktualität Ed. By Helmut Heit (Review). Journal of Nietzsche Studies 44 (1):128-131.
    Few will dispute that the sciences were of special importance to Nietzsche. The natural and human sciences had a significant influence on his thought from the very beginning, and his writings probe and engage with them, exploring their interrelations as well as their place in an adequate broader view of our existence. By contrast, it is less clear whether Nietzsche had, or thought that we could have, something that amounts to a philosophy of science. To the extent that he did, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mario Brandhorst (2012). Woran scheitert Kants Theorie der Freiheit? In Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (eds.), Sind Wir Bürger Zweier Welten?: Freiheit Und Moralische Verantwortung Im Transzendentalen Idealismus. Meiner
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (2012). Einleitung. In Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (eds.), Sind Wir Bürger Zweier Welten?: Freiheit Und Moralische Verantwortung Im Transzendentalen Idealismus. Meiner 9-20.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (eds.) (2012). Sind Wir Bürger Zweier Welten?: Freiheit Und Moralische Verantwortung Im Transzendentalen Idealismus. Meiner.
    - Dieter Schönecker: Kants Grundlegung über den bösen Willen. Eine kommentarische Interpretation von GMS III 457,25-458,5 – Susanne Brauer: Alternative zu Kant? Freiheit nach Hegel in den Grundlinien zur Philosophie des Rechts.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Mario Brandhorst (2010). Naturalism and the Genealogy of Moral Institutions. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 40:5-28.
    This article discusses two general strategies that have been pursued to explain how moral thought and moral institutions might have emerged. The first is found in the tradition of those whom Nietzsche calls "English psychologists"; the second is Nietzsche's own. I begin by giving an account of the resources of "English" genealogy as represented by Paul Rée and especially Charles Darwin. On the basis of that discussion, I consider Nietzsche's objections to English genealogy in detail. I argue that as they (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation