Search results for 'Mariusz Muszynski' (try it on Scholar)

58 found
Sort by:
  1. Krzysztof Rak & Mariusz Muszynski (2007). German Claims Against Poland. The Chesterton Review 33 (1-2):280-287.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Major Michael Muszynski (2005). Spy Handler: Memoir of a KGB Officer. Journal of Military Ethics 4 (3):220-221.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Zbysław Muszyński (2004). Co można odkryć w O tym, co Alicja odkryła po drugiej stronie lustra? Colloquia Communia 76 (1):126-134.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Zbysław Muszyński (2003). O systemie konceptualnym i realizmie zewnętrznym. Filozofia Nauki 3.score: 30.0
    The notion of conceptual system is usually connected with criticism or defence of relativism but sometimes the notion appears in discussion on realism/anti-realism. The aim of the article is: (1) to present connection between understanding of notion of conceptual system and ways of understanding of realism/anti-realism; (2) to present that notion may constitute a foundation of argument for realism, although usually it is taken as argument for anti-realism. Investigations of the article create the basis for discussion of the conception of (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mariusz Flasiński (1997). "Every Man in His Notions" or Alchemists' Discussion on Artificial Intelligence. Foundations of Science 2 (1):107-121.score: 3.0
    A survey of the main approaches in a mind study -oriented part of Artificial Intelligence is made focusing on controversial issues and extreme hypotheses. Various meanings of terms: "intelligence" and "artificial intelligence" are discussed. Limitations for constructing intelligent systems resulting from the lack of formalized models of cognitive activity are shown. The approaches surveyed are then recapitulated in the light of these limitations.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion, Mariusz Urbański & Andrzej Wiśniewski (forthcoming). Socratic Trees. Studia Logica.score: 3.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Mariusz Weiss & Wioletta Dziarnowska (2012). Umysł moralny a namysł etyczny: między neuroetyką a tradycyjną filozofią moralności. Studia Z Kognitywistyki I Filozofii Umysłu 6.score: 3.0
    W ostatnich latach mamy do czynienia z dynamicznym rozwojem neuroetyki, tj. subdyscypliny nauk o mózgu badającej rozmaite zagadnienia etyczne w kontekście funkcjonowania ludzkiego umysłu i mózgu. Centralnym przedmiotem tych badań jest specyficznie ludzka zdolność do wydawania sądów moralnych oraz jej mechanizmy. Tymczasem twierdzenia neuroetyki mają znacznie szerszy wymiar; wykracza on bowiem poza kwestie czysto opisowe i obejmuje swym zasięgiem zagadnienia teoretyczne etyki. W niniejszym artykule rozważam znaczenie badań neuroetycznych dla analiz przeprowadzanych w obszarze etyki normatywnej oraz metaetyki.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Mariusz Bratnicki, Aldona Fraczkiewicz & Rafal Kozlowski (2007). The Dialectics of Entrepreneurial Leadership. Toward a Dynamic Theory of Corporate Governance. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:333-338.score: 3.0
    Dialectical contradictions influence organizational processes in distinct ways and create a unique dynamics in terms of leadership process in entrepreneurialorganizations. We integrate research from charismatic, transformational, and organizational literature, as well as entrepreneurship literature, to create a generalized model of entrepreneurial leadership that is descriptively robust and conceptually distinct from existing concepts. We focus specifically on visionary, transformational, and motivational contradictions of entrepreneurial leadership and conclude by discussing the implications of organizational reconciliation of these three contradictions for leadership research and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Mariusz Ciszek (2003). Petera Singera relatywistyczna koncepcja bioetyki jako krytyka etyki tradycyjnej. Filozofia Nauki 3.score: 3.0
    Peter Singer is one of the most famous bioethicists in the world. His controversial opinions disseminated in his countless publications and his undoubtedly good erudition made him very popular. Using logical arguments he always tries to prove that only a conscious being, a person, has the right to live. No wonder that his opponents call him "the famous death messenger". Australian philosopher is an ethic relativist in the way that he resigns from objective values in his conception. Moreover, he doesn't (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Mariusz Dembiński (2003). Rytuał jako forma i narzędzie badania lekcji. Colloquia Communia 75 (2):179-196.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Mariusz Ferenc (2009). Poza zasadą różnorodności, czyli czemu służy krytyka spekulatywna. Principia.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Paweł Garbacz (2010). Zagadnienie istnienia artefaktów. Głos w dyskusji. Filozofia Nauki 3.score: 3.0
    In this paper I discuss the arguments against the existence of artefacts, which were propounded by Mariusz Grygianiec in his book Identyczność i trwanie. I show that all of these arguments are inconclusive or are in the need of further elaboration. Therefore, I conclude that the the metaphysical thesis to the effect that artefacts do not exist remains unsupported.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Mariusz J. Golecki (2011). A Game-Theoretic Solution to the Problem of Reciprocity and Fairness in Contracts. In Jerzy Stelmach & Wojciech Załuski (eds.), Game Theory and the Law. Copernicus Center Press.score: 3.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Mariusz Grygianiec (2011). Aksjomatyczne definicje genidentyczności. Filozofia Nauki 1.score: 3.0
    The main aim of the paper is to revive Zdzisław Augustynek's attempts to define the relation of genidentity. The text embraces the following issues: (i) a presentation of three axiomatic definitions of genidentity; (ii) a reconstruction of the definitions in question in the language of the predicate calculus; (iii) a supplementing the above reconstruction by appropriate proofs; (iv) an analysis of the selected methodological and ontological assumptions of the discussed systems; (v) a comparison of Augustynek's systems with Eugeniusz Żabski's proposal; (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Mariusz Grygianiec (2005). Analiza krytyczna pojęcia rzeczy w ontologii ewentyzmu punktowego. Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 53 (1):107-120.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Mariusz Grygianiec (2001). Aksjomatyczna rekonstrukcja reizmu według Czesława Lejewskiego. Filozofia Nauki 4.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Mariusz Grygianiec (2008). Argument z superweniencji a niekonstruktywny naturalizm. Filozofia Nauki 3.score: 3.0
    In a series of influential articles Jaegwon Kim has developed strong arguments against nonreductive physicalism as a possible solution to the problem of mental causation. One of them is the Supervenience Argument which states that assuming the mental/physical supervenience thesis, the causal closure principle, the exclusion principle with the no-overdetermination requirement and property dualism we obtain the conclusion that mental causation is unintelligible. On the other hand Collin McGinn has argued that a solution to the mind-body problem is forever beyond (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Mariusz Grygianiec (2011). Ewentystyczna definicja rzeczy w świetle argumentu Adriana Kuźniara. Filozofia Nauki 1.score: 3.0
    Kuźniar's argument against the point-eventistic definition of a thing rests on the fact that its two important conditions - namely the spatial extension condition and the temporal continuity condition - cannot be jointly satisfied. The paper provides a detailed analysis and an assessment of Kuźniar's objection and offers some strate-gies in order to overcome difficulties generated by it.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Mariusz Grygianiec (2010). Eliminatywizm i artefakty. Filozofia Nauki 3.score: 3.0
    The paper provides an answer to Paweł Garbacz's article Problem of Artefact's Existence, which is a critique of eliminativistic views presented in my book Identyczność i trwanie. Studium ontologiczne (Identity and Persistence. An Ontological Study). In the text crucial objections formulated by Garbacz are reconstructed and carefully discussed.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Mariusz Grygianiec (2007). 'Four-Dimensionalism' - analiza i interpretacja. Filozofia Nauki 1.score: 3.0
    There are several faces of Four-Dimensionalism. Sometimes 4D-ism is formulated as the thesis that the material world is composed of spatial as well as temporal parts. Another version of 4D-ism states that persisting objects are extended over time in the same way that they are extended over space. Some Four-Dimensionalists defend the thesis that all objects persist by perduring i.e. by having different temporal parts at different times. Sometimes 4D-ism means the same as eternalism - the thesis that past and (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Mariusz Grygianiec (2005). Genidentyczność a metafizyka persystencji: endurantyzm, perdurantyzm i eksdurantyzm. Filozofia Nauki 2.score: 3.0
    The metaphysical explanations of genidentity are very important both for scien-tific researches and for everyday human activities. Endurantism, perdurantism and exdurantism (stage view and point-eventism) are the standard metaphysical theo-ries, which provide descriptions and explanations of relations of change and persistence. The descriptions and explanations in question give simultaneously the truth-conditions for statements about an identity of objects, which persist and undergo changes in time. The main aim of the paper is to formulate the above-mentioned metaphysical stances and to give (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Mariusz Grygianiec (2003). Indywiduum. Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 45 (1):91-100.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Mariusz Grygianiec (2006). Identyczność osobowa w czasie: konsekwencje esencjalizmu. Filozofia Nauki 3.score: 3.0
    The paper is an attempt to formulate some consequences of the metaphysical doctrine of mereological essentialism (ME) and the assumption that persons persisting through time remain identical in the strict and philosophical sense (Chisholm, following Butler and Reid). Those consequences are substantiality , non-constitutivity , constantiality , anti-identism ( non-bodility ), and simplicity of persons. The author tries to show that although the above stance has a great theoretical appeal, it leads to the many further difficulties, which remain without reasonable (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Mariusz Grygianiec (2005). Incendium philosophiae. Filozofia Nauki 4.score: 3.0
    The text is a rejoinder to Mr. Wciórka's critical analysis of two author's arguments against nominalistic definition of abstract objects. The author shows that although his first argument is not sound, the second still remains correct. The paper also offers a modified definition of abstract objects inspired by E. N. Zalta's metaphysical theory of objects and some critical remarks, which Mr. Wciórka aimed at the earlier papers of the author.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Mariusz Grygianiec (2001). Kotarbiński przeciw uniwersaliom. Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 39 (3):95-114.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Mariusz Grygianiec (2009). Monizm anomalny i epifenomenalizm. Filozofia Nauki 2.score: 3.0
    In the text Jaegwon Kim's epiphenomenalist objection to anomalous monism is critically discussed and refuted. The author tries to show that the objection in question originates mainly on the basis of disregarding of Davidsonian ontology - particularly his views on properties and events. The main aim of the paper is to demonstrate that the epiphenomenalist objection does not arise, if we are prepared to take Davidson's ontology seriously.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Mariusz Grygianiec (2001). Metoda parafraz semantycznych a zagadnienie idealizmu. Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 37 (1):95-111.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Mariusz Grygianiec (2006). Przeciw ewentyzmowi punktowemu. W hołdzie Profesorowi Zdzisławowi Augustynkowi. Filozofia Nauki 4.score: 3.0
    The ontological theory of point eventism appears in the Polish philosophical literature as Zdzisław Augustynek's original work, belonging to the glorious philosophical tradition of the Lvov-Warsaw School. The author concentrates exclusively on "weak points" of Augustynek's eventism (skipping simultaneously all its unquestionable advantages); he examines basic notions and statements of the analysed doctrine. The main aim of this critical survey is to prepare a ground for a proper reconstruction of this ontological stance.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Mariusz Grygianiec (2012). Relewancja kauzalna a nominalizm. Kilka uwag na temat ontologii Davidsona. Filozofia Nauki 1.score: 3.0
    The paper presents a rejoinder to Katarzyna Paprzycka's critique of my defence of Davidson's ontology. According to Paprzycka the epiphenomenalists objection to the doctrine of anomalous monism, considered as an internal objection, is unquestionably flawed, but when it comes to some external interpretations of the objection in question — it is justified. The text provides a couple of arguments and comments which are intended to show that in most cases the external objection to anomalous monism is in fact either uncharitable (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Mariusz Grygianiec (2009). Teoria części czasowych – tezy i argumentacje. Filozofia Nauki 4.score: 3.0
    In the paper the most popular arguments in favour of the doctrine of temporal parts are presented and analysed. The author discusses the following arguments: (i) from analogy; (ii) from ontological parsimony; (iii) from intrinsic change; (iv) from mereological change; (v) against presentism; (vi) from time travel; (vii) from vagueness; (viii) from coincidence. The main aim of the paper is to show - in the light of examined arguments - that the 3D-ism/4D-ism equivalence thesis might be treated as a well-founded (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Mariusz Grygianiec (2005). Teoria obiektów abstrakcyjnych Edwarda N. Zalty. Analiza i krytyka. Filozofia Nauki 1.score: 3.0
    The paper offers a sketchy reconstruction of axiomatic foundations of Zalta's theory of abstract objects. The theory is based on Ernst Mally's distinction between two types of predication: an exemplification of properties and an encoding of properties. The author shows how the theory in question could be used to reconstruct in a satisfying way many other metaphysical theories e.g. the theory of Platonic Forms, the theory of situations, the theory of possible worlds. The paper also provides several critical comments to (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Mariusz Grygianiec (2005). W obronie mereologicznego esencjalizmu. Filozofia Nauki 3.score: 3.0
    The paper is an attempt to defend the Chisholm's metaphysical doctrine called mereological essentialism. The main thesis of mereological essentialism states that for any objects x and y - if x is ever a part of y, then y is necessarily such that x is a part of y, i.e. that all parts of y are essential to it (y has them at any time that y exists). This radical theory gives a categorisation of all objects via entia per se (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Mariusz Grygianiec (2011). Zdarzenia i momenty. Schemat interpretacji nieewentystycznej. Filozofia Nauki 1.score: 3.0
    In the text Zdarzenia, rzeczy, procesy Zdzisław Augustynek argued against some versions of liberal reism that they are not able to deliver appropriate, non-circular definitions both of events and moments respectively. The main aim of the article is to show that the objection in question is not sound: indeed, we are vested with a proce-dure to find a way out from the indicated difficulty. In the text three forms of liberal reism are presented and their problems with the relevant definitions (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Mariusz Grygianiec (2007). Zasady mereologicznego esencjalizmu. Filozofia Nauki 3.score: 3.0
    Mereologcal essentialism is a metaphysical doctrine formulated and defended originally by Roderick M. Chisholm. The main principle of mereological essentialism states, that for any objects x and y - if x is ever a part of y, then y is necessarily such that x is a part of y, i.e. that all parts of y are essential to it (y has them at any time that y exists). The principle may also be put by saying, that every object has the (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Mariusz Gulczyński (1970). Kapitalizm panstwowy: postep czy regres? Człowiek I Światopogląd 1 (3):55-75.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Mariusz Gulczyński (1968). Od autarkii do globalizmu. Drogi ekspansji amerykańskiej. Człowiek I Światopogląd (4):5-34.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Mariusz Gulczyński (1969). Spór o kształt wychowania. Człowiek I Światopogląd 1 (3):110-114.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Mariusz Kaniewski (2007). Kartezjańska droga Edmunda Husserla do redukcji transcendentalnej. Filo-Sofija 7 (1(7)):141-162.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Mariusz Kaniewski (2008). O ontologii procesu Romana Ingardena. Filo-Sofija 8 (1(8)):145-153.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Mariusz Kapczyński (2001). Globalizacja - nowy (nie)porządek świata? (Zygmunt Bauman: Globalizacja. I co z tego dla ludzi wynika). Civitas (5):316-327.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Mariusz Kwiatkowski (2002). Zasoby demokracji w świetle sporów o kapitał społeczny. Colloquia Communia 73 (2):46-56.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Elżbieta Laskowska & Mariusz Kuciński (eds.) (2008). Etyka W Mediach W Dobie Globalizacji Wyzwania I Zagrożenia: Materialy Konferencyjne: Bydgoszcz, 7 Maja 2008 R. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego.score: 3.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Danuta Ślęczek-Czakon & Mariusz Wojewoda (eds.) (2009). Wartości--Tradycja I Współczesność. Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Mariusz Moryń (2008). Doświadczenie życia jako podstawa oczywistości w Nowej Fenomenologii Hermanna Schmitza. Fenomenologia 6:115-128.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Mariusz Oziębłowski (2006). Granica czy most? O funkcjach rozumienia w hermeneutyce H.-G. Gadamera. Diametros 10:65-77.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Mariusz Stanowski (2001). Przeciw chaosowi i przypadkowości. Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 37 (1):276-278.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Witold Strawiński, Mariusz Grygianiec, Anna Brożek, Jacek Juliusz Jadacki & Stanisław Moryto (eds.) (2006). Myśli o Języku, Nauce I Wartościach. Wydawn. Nauk. Semper.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Mariusz Turowski (2012). Europocentryzm – technologia i ontologia kolonizacji Kilka uwag o liberalizmie, podboju, supremacji rasowej i niewolnictwie przez pryzmat tezy o indywidualizmie posesywnym C. B. Macphersona. Nowa Krytyka 26.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Mariusz Turowski (2012). Filozofia, dżihad, nowoczesność: humanizm i oświecenie od Francisa Bacona do Ismaila Bardhiego (i z powrotem do Joanny Rajkowskiej). Nowa Krytyka 26.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Mariusz Turowski (2007). Liberalizm – między ideologią a metapolityką. Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia:77-86.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. Mariusz Urbański & Wioletta Dziarnowska (2012). Paula Thagarda koncepcja rozumowania abdukcyjnego. Studia Z Kognitywistyki I Filozofii Umysłu 6.score: 3.0
    Na przykładzie koncepcji rozumowania abdukcyjnego, autorstwa Paula Thagarda, w artykule niniejszym omawia się sposób pojmowania abdukcji charakterystyczny dla eksplanacyjno-koherencyjnego modelu tego typu rozumowań, który w chwili obecnej oferuje najbardziej satysfakcjonujące połączenie psychologicznej adekwatności oraz efektywności obliczeniowej definiowanych w jego ramach procedur generowania i oceny hipotez abdukcyjnych.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. Wojciech Wciórka (2005). Argument Mariusza Grygiańca za niepoprawnością definicji przedmiotu ogólnego. Filozofia Nauki 4.score: 3.0
    Mariusz Grygianiec has criticized the so called "proofs of nonexistence of general objects" as based on a wrong definition. In this paper one of his arguments is shown to depend on an unsatisfiable condition (contradictory to some basic ontological intuitions) without which, however, it is inconclusive as a reductio ad absurdum. Furthermore, it is suggested that even if the argument was sound, it could by no means be counted - contrary to the Author's intention - as a counterargument to (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. Mariusz Węgrzyn (2006). Polska w Unii Europejskiej. Unia Europejska w świecie - analiza fundamentalna. Civitas (9).score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  54. Bartosz Wojciechowski, Marek Zirk-Sadowski & Mariusz J. Golecki (eds.) (2009). Between Complexity of Law and Lack of Order: Philosophy of Law in the Era of Globalization. Wydawn. Adam Marszałek.score: 3.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  55. Mariusz Wojewoda (2010). Pluralizm Aksjologiczny I Jego Implikacje We Współczesnej Filozofii Religii. Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.score: 3.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  56. Mariusz M. Żydowo (ed.) (2005). Ethical Problems in the Rapid Advancement of Science. Polish Academy of Sciences.score: 3.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  57. Mariusz Zemło (1995). Fenomenologiczna metodologia Alfreda Schuetza. Principia.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  58. Mariusz Zemło, Arkadiusz Jabłoński & Jan Szymczyk (eds.) (2010). Wiedza Między Słowem a Obrazem. Wydawn. Kul.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation