28 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Mark A. Wrathall [28]Mark Adam Wrathall [1]
  1. Mark A. Wrathall (ed.) (2013). The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger's Being and Time. Cambridge University Press.
    The Companion begins with a section-by-section overview of Being and Time and a chapter reviewing the genesis of this seminal work. The final chapter situates Being and Time in the context of Heidegger's later work.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Mark A. Wrathall (2010). Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Part I. Truth and Disclosure: 1. Unconcealment; 2. The conditions of truth in Heidegger and Davidson; 3. On the 'existential positivity of our ability to be deceived'; 4. Heidegger on Plato, truth, and unconcealment: the 1931-32 lecture on The Essence of Truth; Part II. Language: 5. Social constraints on conversational content: Heidegger on Rede and Gerede; 6. Conversation, language, saying and showing; 7. The revealed word and world disclosure: Heidegger and Pascal on the phenomenology of religious (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mark A. Wrathall (2009). Introduction. Philosophical Studies 144 (1):1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Mark A. Wrathall (2009). On the Existential Positivity of Our Ability to Be Deceived. In Clancy W. Martin (ed.), The Philosophy of Deception. Oxford University Press. 67.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mark A. Wrathall (2007). The Phenomenology of Social Rules. In Thomas Baldwin (ed.), Reading Merleau-Ponty: On Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge. 123 - 147.
    In this paper, I explore the nature of social rules, including the limitations of most theories of rules which see them either as intentionally followed by, or as objectively describing the behavior of social actors. I argue that a phenomenological description of what it is like actually to be governed by a rule points the way to reconceptualizing the role of social rules in structuring our world and our experience of the world.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Hubert L. Dreyfus & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.) (2006/2009). A Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism. Blackwell Pub..
  7. Mark A. Wrathall (2006). Ne-racionalni temelji i ne-konceptualni sadržaj. Filozofska Istrazivanja 26 (2):283-295.
    Fenomenološka tradicija dugo je smatrala da prirodna percepcija nije ni konceptualno artikulirana niti upravljana determinističkim zakonima, već je radije organizirana prema praktično artikuliranoj strukturi tjelesnog bitka-u-svijetu. Ali to ostavlja problem objašnjavanja kako percepcija može omogućiti opravdavajuću podršku mišljenju. Odgovor fenomenologa jest taj da nam značenjska struktura prirodne percepcije omogućuje da mislimo o objektima motivirajući pojedinačne misli o objektima kakvima se oni predstavljaju u percepciji. Pokazujem kako takvo gledište omogućuje izlaz iz briga koje more suvremenu filozofiju uma.The phenomenological tradition has long (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Hubert L. Dreyfus & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.) (2005). A Companion to Heidegger. Blackwell Pub..
  9. Mark A. Wrathall (2005). Fondements non rationnels et contenus non conceptuels. Synthesis Philosophica 20 (2):265-278.
    La tradition phénoménologique a longtemps considéré que la perception naturelle n’était ni actualisée conceptuellement ni régie par des lois déterministes, mais qu’elle était plutôt organisée d’après la strcture pratiquement articulée de l’être-dans-le-monde physique. Or, cela laisse entier le problème d’explication de la façon dont la perception peut assurer un support justificatif à la pensée. La réponse de la phénoménologie est que c’est la structure significative de la perception naturelle qui nous permet de penser des objets en motivant nons pensées sur (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Mark A. Wrathall (2005/2006). How to Read Heidegger. W.W. Norton.
    Dasein and being-in-the-world -- The world -- The structure of being-in-the-world, pt. 1: Disposedness and moods -- The structure of being-in-the-world, pt. 2: Understanding and interpretation -- Everydayness and the 'one' -- Death and authenticity -- Truth and art -- Language -- Technology -- Our mortal dwelling with things.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Mark A. Wrathall (2005). Non-Rational Grounds and Non-Conceptual Content. Synthesis Philosophica 2 (40):265-278.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Mark A. Wrathall (2005). Nicht-rationale grundlagen und nicht-konzeptueller inhalt. Synthesis Philosophica 20 (2):265-278.
    Die phänomenologische Tradition war lange Zeit der Auffassung, dass die natürliche Perzeption weder konzeptuell artikuliert ist noch von deterministischen Gesetzen beherrscht wird, sondern dass sie eher nach der praktisch artikulierten Struktur des körperlichen In-der-Welt-Seins organisiert ist. Dabei bleibt die Erklärung dafür problematisch, auf welche Art und Weise die Perzeption dem Denken eine rechtfertigende Unterstützung bieten kann. Die Antwort der Phänomenologen lautet, dass es die bedeutungstragende Struktur der natürlichen Perzeption ist, die uns ermöglicht, über Objekte nachzudenken, indem sie die einzelnen Gedanken (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Mark A. Wrathall (2003). Introduction: Metaphysics and Onto-Theology. In , Religion After Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press. 1--6.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Mark A. Wrathall (ed.) (2003). Religion After Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
    How should we understand religion, and what place should it hold, in an age in which metaphysics has come into disrepute? The metaphysical assumptions which supported traditional theologies are no longer widely accepted, but it is not clear how this 'end of metaphysics' should be understood, nor what implications it ought to have for our understanding of religion. At the same time there is renewed interest in the sacred and the divine in disciplines as varied as philosophy, psychology, literature, history, (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Hubert L. Dreyfus & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.) (2002). Heidegger Reexamined. Routledge.
    Heidegger and the study of his thought have earned wide acceptance, extending beyond philosophy to influence an array of other disciplines. Critically selected by leading scholars in the field, the articles in this new collection bring together the most essential and representative scholarship on Heidegger. Focusing on the major phases of his work which attracted most attention from contemporary thinkers, as well as exploring new and important areas of Heidegger scholarship, this four-volume set is an invaluable resource for any curriculum (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Mark A. Wrathall (2002). Heidegger, Truth, and Reference. Inquiry 45 (2):217 – 228.
  17. Hubert L. Dreyfus, Mark A. Wrathall & J. E. Malpas (2000). Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. James E. Faulconer & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.) (2000). Appropriating Heidegger. Cambridge University Press.
    Although Martin Heidegger is undeniably one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century, among the philosophers who study his work we find considerable disagreement over what might seem to be basic issues: why is Heidegger important? What did his work do? This volume is an explicit response to these differences, and is unique in bringing together representatives of many different approaches to Heidegger's philosophy. Topics covered include Heidegger's place in the 'history of being', Heidegger and ethics, Heidegger and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Mark A. Wrathall (2000). Language, Thought, and Logic. International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1):124-126.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Mark A. Wrathall (2000). Philosophy, Thinkers, and Heidegger's Place in the History of Being. In James E. Faulconer & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.), Appropriating Heidegger. Cambridge University Press. 9--29.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Mark A. Wrathall & Jeff E. Malpas (eds.) (2000). Heidegger Coping and Cognitive Science. MIT Press.
    The essays in this volume reflect this desire to "make a difference"—not just in the world of academic philosophy, but in the broader world.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Mark A. Wrathall (1999). Heidegger and Truth as Correspondence. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (1):69 – 88.
    I argue in this paper that Heidegger, contrary to the view of many scholars, in fact endorsed a view of truth as a sort of correspondence. I first show how it is a mistake to take Heidegger's notion of 'unconcealment' as a definition of propositional truth. It is thus not only possible but also essential to disambiguate Heidegger's use of the word 'truth', which he occasionally used to refer to both truth as it is ordinarily understood and unconcealment understood as (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Mark A. Wrathall (1999). Introduction. Philosophical Topics 27 (2):5-6.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Mark A. Wrathall (1999). Practical Incommensurability and the Phenomenological Basis of Robust Realism. Inquiry 42 (1):79 – 88.
    This paper develops a modification of the notion of incommensurable worlds upon which Dreyfus and Spinosa base their robust realism. In particular, I argue that we cannot make sense of a conception of incommensurability according to which incommensurable worlds entail cognitively incompatible claims. Instead, as Dreyfus and Spinosa sometimes suggest, incommensurable worlds should be understood as being practically incompatible, meaning that the inhabitants of one world cannot, given their practices for dealing with some things, engage in practices central to the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Mark A. Wrathall (1999). Re-Establishing the Contemporary Relevance of Socratic Dialectic. Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (1):219-226.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Mark A. Wrathall (1999). Social Constraints on Conversational Content: Heidegger on Rede and Gerede. Philosophical Topics 27 (2):25-46.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Mark A. Wrathall (1999). The Conditions of Truth in Heidegger and Davidson. The Monist 82 (2):304-323.
  28. Mark A. Wrathall (1998). Intentionality Without Representations. Philosophy Today 42 (9999):182-189.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation