5 found
Sort by:
  1. Mark D. Gossiaux (2008). Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II. Review of Metaphysics 61 (4):866-868.
  2. Mark D. Gossiaux (2007). James of Viterbo and the Late Thirteenth-Century Debate Concerning the Reality of the Possibles. Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 74 (2):483-522.
    This paper reconstructs the teaching of James of Viterbo on the ontological status of the possibles, and compares his position with those of Henry of Ghent and Godfrey of Fontaines. James holds that possibles are real only in a qualified sense, as objects of God’s power and knowledge. While James appears to have been influenced by Henry in his explanation of divine knowledge of creatures, in his analysis of the possibles he makes no use of Henry’s theory of esse essentiae, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mark D. Gossiaux (2003). Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Existence of God as Self-Evident. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):57-79.
    Thomas Aquinas holds that the existence of God is self-evident in itself (because God’s essence is his existence) but not to us (since we do not know the divine essence). Giles of Rome agrees with the first part of Thomas’s claim, but he parts company with Aquinas by maintaining that God’s existence is self-evident to the wise. Since the wise can know that God is his existence, they cannot think of him as not existing. This paper reexamines Thomas’s teaching in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Mark D. Gossiaux (2002). Spade, Paul Vincent, Ed. The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Review of Metaphysics 55 (3):651-652.
  5. Mark D. Gossiaux (2000). Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Review of Metaphysics 54 (1):159-160.