14 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Mark Tushnet [11]Mark V. Tushnet [3]
  1. Mark Tushnet (2012). Reflections on Democratic Experimentalism in the Progressive Tradition. Contemporary Pragmatism 9 (2):255-261.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Mark Tushnet (2012). The Supreme Court and the American Elite, 1789-2008. Review of Metaphysics 65 (3):672-673.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mark Tushnet (2010). Constitutional Design as If Civic Education Mattered. Journal of Social Philosophy 41 (2):210-213.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Mark Tushnet (2010). How Different Are Waldron's and Fallon's Core Cases For and Against Judicial Review? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):49-70.
    Recently Jeremy Waldron offered the ‘core of the case against judicial review’. Richard Fallon responded with the ‘core of an uneasy case for judicial review.’ The core case for judicial review rested on a number of important conditions, and the core case against it incorporated a number of important qualifications. The two cases are quite similar once we take the conditions and qualifications into account. At its heart Professor Fallon's case rests on the proposition that ‘[l]egislative action is more likely (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mark Tushnet (2006). Lawrence G. Sager, Justice in Plain Clothes: A Theory of American Constitutional Practice:Justice in Plain Clothes: A Theory of American Constitutional Practice. Ethics 116 (3):607-611.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Peter Cane & Mark V. Tushnet (eds.) (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies. Oxford University Press.
    This volume in the prestigious series of Oxford Handbooks provides a widely accessible overview of legal scholarship at the start of the 21st century. Through 43 essays by leading legal scholars based in the USA, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Germany, it offers original and interpretative accounts of the nature, themes and trends of research and writing about all areas of the law.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Mark Tushnet (2005). Survey Article: Critical Legal Theory (Without Modifiers) in the United States. Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (1):99–112.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Mark V. Tushnet (2005). Critical Legal Theory. In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell Pub.. 80--89.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Mark Tushnet (2003). Non-Judicial Review. In Tom Campbell, Jeffrey Goldsworthy & Adrienne Stone (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: Instruments and Institutions. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Mark V. Tushnet, A New Constitutionalism for Liberals?
    It has been apparent for at least a decade that liberal constitutional theory is in deep trouble. Of course there are many versions of liberal constitutional theory, but they have essentially no connection to existing practices of constitutional law, considering as practices of constitutional law all the activities of our institutions of government that implicate - interpret, advance, deal with, whatever - fundamental principle. Instead, liberal constitutional theory's vision of the future is nostalgia for the past. For liberal constitutional theorists (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Mark Tushnet (2000). Legal Conventionalism in the U.S. Constitutional Law of Privacy. Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (02):141-.
  12. Mark Tushnet (1998). Review: Understanding the Non-Legalized Constitution. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 17 (2):193 - 202.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Mark Tushnet (1991). Change and Continuity in the Concept of Civil Rights: Thurgood Marshall and Affirmative Action. Social Philosophy and Policy 8 (02):150-.
  14. Mark Tushnet & Louis Michael Seidman (1986). A Comment on Tooley's Abortion and Infanticide. Ethics 96 (2):350-355.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation