Martha Swartz [3]Martha S. Swartz [1]
  1.  4
    Martha Swartz (1992). Pregnant Woman Vs. Fetus: A Dilemma for Hospital Ethics Committees. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (01):51-.
    Hospital ehtics committees are often consulted when cmopeting patient interests blur an otherwise clear course of medical treatment. Nowhere is the potential for competing interests greater than in the field of abosterics, wherer obstetricians have traditionally viewed themselves as having two patients: the pregnant woman and the fetus.
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  1
    Suzanne M. Mitchell & Martha S. Swartz (1990). Is There a Place for Lawyers on Ethics Committees? A View From the Inside. Hastings Center Report 20 (2):32-33.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  2
    John D. Engel, Gregory Kane, Deborah L. Jones, Debra Lynn-McHale, Martha Swartz, Paul Durbin & Don Klingen (1997). The Patient Self-Determination Act and Advance Directives: Snapshots of Activities in a Tertiary Health Care Center. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 18 (3):193-208.
    This study describes the results of a retrospective review of patients' charts who had an advanced directive (AD) and who were hospitalized in a tertiary, acute care teaching hospital. The purpose of the review was to understand from clinical, sociological, ethical and legal perspectives the nature and utility of ADs. Findings and implications of the review are discussed in terms of: patient demographics; diagnoses; quality of ADs; influence of ADs on clinical decisions; and legal aspects of ADs.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography