9 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Martine C. de Vries [8]Martine de Vries [1]
  1.  1
    Martine C. De Vries (2015). The Use of Dogmas in Pediatric Research Ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (11):18-19.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  41
    Martine de Vries & Evert van Leeuwen (2010). Reflective Equilibrium and Empirical Data: Third Person Moral Experiences in Empirical Medical Ethics. Bioethics 24 (9):490 - 498.
    In ethics, the use of empirical data has become more and more popular, leading to a distinct form of applied ethics, namely empirical ethics. This ‘empirical turn’ is especially visible in bioethics. There are various ways of combining empirical research and ethical reflection. In this paper we discuss the use of empirical data in a special form of Reflective Equilibrium (RE), namely the Network Model with Third Person Moral Experiences. In this model, the empirical data consist of the moral experiences (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3.  6
    Irma M. Hein, Pieter W. Troost, Alice Broersma, Martine C. De Vries, Joost G. Daams & Ramón J. L. Lindauer (2015). Why is It Hard to Make Progress in Assessing Children’s Decision-Making Competence? BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1.
    For decades, the discussion on children’s competence to consent to medical issues has concentrated around normative concerns, with little progress in clinical practices. Decision-making competence is an important condition in the informed consent model. In pediatrics, clinicians need to strike a proper balance in order to both protect children’s interests when they are not fully able to do so themselves and to respect their autonomy when they are. Children’s competence to consent, however, is currently not assessed in a standardized way. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  3
    Martine C. de Vries, Mirjam Houtlosser, Jan M. Wit, Dirk P. Engberts, Dorine Bresters, Gertjan Jl Kaspers & Evert van Leeuwen (2011). Ethical Issues at the Interface of Clinical Care and Research Practice in Pediatric Oncology: A Narrative Review of Parents' and Physicians' Experiences. BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):18.
    BackgroundPediatric oncology has a strong research culture. Most pediatric oncologists are investigators, involved in clinical care as well as research. As a result, a remarkable proportion of children with cancer enrolls in a trial during treatment. This paper discusses the ethical consequences of the unprecedented integration of research and care in pediatric oncology from the perspective of parents and physicians.MethodologyAn empirical ethical approach, combining a narrative review of qualitative studies on parents' and physicians' experiences of the pediatric oncology research practice, (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  6
    Martine C. de Vries & A. A. Eduard Verhagen (2008). A Case Against Something That is Not the Case: The Groningen Protocol and the Moral Principle of Non-Maleficence. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):29 – 31.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  1
    Martine C. de Vries & Aa Eduard Verhagen (2008). A Case Against Something That is Not the Case: The Groningen Protocol and the Moral Principle of Non-Maleficence. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):29 - 31.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. Martine C. de Vries & A. A. Eduard Verhagen (2008). A Case Against Something That is Not the Case: The Groningen Protocol and the Moral Principle of Non-Maleficence. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):29-31.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  1
    Irma M. Hein, Martine C. De Vries, Pieter W. Troost, Gerben Meynen, Johannes B. Van Goudoever & Ramón J. L. Lindauer (2015). Informed Consent Instead of Assent is Appropriate in Children From the Age of Twelve: Policy Implications of New Findings on Children’s Competence to Consent to Clinical Research. BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-7.
    BackgroundFor many decades, the debate on children’s competence to give informed consent in medical settings concentrated on ethical and legal aspects, with little empirical underpinnings. Recently, data from empirical research became available to advance the discussion. It was shown that children’s competence to consent to clinical research could be accurately assessed by the modified MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research. Age limits for children to be deemed competent to decide on research participation have been studied: generally children of 11.2 (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    Annelien L. Bredenoord, Martine C. De Vries & Hans van Delden (2014). The Right to an Open Future Concerning Genetic Information. American Journal of Bioethics 14 (3):21-23.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography