104 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Mary B. Mahowald [70]Mary Briody Mahowald [22]Mary Mahowald [12]
  1. Mary Briody Mahowald (2005). Aging, Death, and Human Longevity: A Philosophical Inquiry (Review). Hypatia 20 (3):226-229.
  2.  11
    Anita Silvers, David Wasserman, Mary B. Mahowald & Lawrence C. Becker (1999). Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    How should we respond to individuals with disabilities? What does it mean to be disabled? Over fifty million Americans, from neonates to the fragile elderly, are disabled. Some people say they have the right to full social participation, while others repudiate such claims as delusive or dangerous. In this compelling book, three experts in ethics, medicine, and the law address pressing disability questions in bioethics and public policy. Anita Silvers, David Wasserman, and Mary B. Mahowald test important theories (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  3.  1
    Mary Briody Mahowald (1995). [Book Review] Women and Children in Health Care, an Unequal Majority. [REVIEW] Hastings Center Report 25 (1):950-951.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  4.  32
    Mary B. Mahowald (2004). Respect for Embryos and the Potentiality Argument. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):209-214.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5.  19
    Mary B. Mahowald (2004). Self-Preservation: An Argument for Therapeutic Cloning, and a Strategy for Fostering Respect for Moral Integrity. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):56-66.
    The issues of human cloning and stem cell retrieval are inseparable in circumstances in which the rationale of self-preservation may be invoked as a negative right. I apply this rationale to a hypothetical case in which cloning is necessary to preserve the bodily integrity or life of an individual. Self-preservation as moral integrity is examined in a narrower context, i.e., as applicable to those for whom deliberate termination of embryonic life is morally-problematic. This issue is addressed through comparison with two (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  90
    Mary Briody Mahowald (2005). The President's Council on Bioethics 2002-2004: An Overview. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 (2):159-171.
  7.  70
    Mary B. Mahowald (1997). What Classical American Philosophers Missed: Jane Addams, Critical Pragmatism, and Cultural Feminism. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (1):39-54.
  8.  12
    Anne Drapkin Lyerly & Mary Briody Mahowald (2001). Maternal-Fetal Surgery: The Fallacy of Abstraction and the Problem of Equipoise. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 9 (2):151-165.
    When surgery is performed on pregnant women forthe sake of the fetus (MFS or maternal fetalsurgery), it is often discussed in terms of thefetus alone. This usage exemplifies whatphilosophers call the fallacy of abstraction: considering a concept as if it were separablefrom another concept whose meaning isessentially related to it. In light of theirpotential separability, research on pregnantwomen raises the possibility of conflictsbetween the interests of the woman and those ofthe fetus. Such research should meet therequirement of equipoise, i.e., a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  11
    Mary B. Mahowald (1983). New Sources for Health Care Ethics. Teaching Philosophy 6 (3):292-294.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  21
    Mary B. Mahowald (2007). Prenatal Testing for Selection Against Disabilities. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (4):457.
    Disability rights advocates sometimes claim that prenatal tests to select against disabilities discriminate against people with disabilities. The “expressivist argument” that supports this position has been challenged on grounds of the difference between fetuses and born persons. In this essay, I explain why the expressivist argument is valid despite the questionableness of its conclusion, and why the distinction between fetuses and born persons fails to provide an adequate counterargument to the expressivist conclusion. I also consider a compelling argument for prenatal (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  18
    Mary Briody Mahowald (2006). Bioethics and Women: Across the Life Span. Oxford University Press.
    All persons, while different from one another, have the same value: this is the author's relatively uncontroversial starting point. Her end point is not uncontroversial: an ideal of justice as human flourishing, based on each person's unique set of capabilities. Because the book's focus is women's health care, gender justice, a necessary component of justice, is central to examination of the issues. Classical pragmatists and feminist standpoint theorists are enlisted in support of a strategy by which gender justice is promoted. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  27
    Mary B. Mahowald (2005). Another View of Potentiality and Human Embryos. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):111-113.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  6
    Mary Briody Mahowald (2013). Idealism Vs. Pragmatism and Other False Dichotomies. The Pluralist 8 (3):133-139.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  16
    Mary B. Mahowald (1988). The Life and Thought of Josiah Royce. Idealistic Studies 18 (3):279-280.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  10
    Mary B. Mahowald (2006). Drawing Lines Between Extremes: Medical Enhancement and Eugenics. The Pluralist 1 (2):19 - 34.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  25
    Mary B. Mahowald (1989). Hospital Ethics Committees: Diverse and Problematic. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 1 (5):237-246.
  17.  33
    Mary Briody Mahowald (1992). To Be or Not Be a Woman: Anorexia Nervosa, Normative Gender Roles, and Feminism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):233-251.
    This paper reviews the characteristics of anorexia nervosa described in the DSM-III-R , relates them to normative gender roles and adolescent development, and critiques those roles on feminist grounds. Two apparently contradictory explanations for the irrational pursuit of thinness are considered: a) the anorexic thus attempts to conform to a socially defined feminine ideal; b) the anorexic thus attempts to avoid the appearance and consequences of mature womanhood. I propose that both explanations are applicable, together emplifying the ambiguity that Simone (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Anita L. Allen, Sandra Lee Bartky, John Christman, Judith Wagner DeCew, Edward Johnson, Lenore Kuo, Mary Briody Mahowald, Kathryn Pauly Morgan, Melinda Roberts, Debra Satz, Susan Sherwin, Anita Superson, Mary Anne Warren & Susan Wendell (1995). 'Nagging' Questions: Feminist Ethics in Everyday Life. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In this anthology of new and classic articles, fifteen noted feminist philosophers explore contemporary ethical issues that uniquely affect the lives of women. These issues in applied ethics include autonomy, responsibility, sexual harassment, women in the military, new technologies for reproduction, surrogate motherhood, pornography, abortion, nonfeminist women and others. Whether generated by old social standards or intensified by recent technology, these dilemmas all pose persistent, 'nagging,' questions that cry out for answers.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  6
    Karen Victor, Robert Sege & Mary B. Mahowald (1993). What Kind of Leave? Hastings Center Report 23 (2):46-46.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  3
    Mary B. Mahowald (2001). Why Retreat to Procedural Justice? American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):25 – 26.
  21.  3
    Joyce Geilker, Eric Geilkar & Mary B. Mahowald (1992). A Pregnant Fellow. Hastings Center Report 22 (5):30-31.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  1
    Mary B. Mahowald (2000). On Helping People to Die: A Pragmatic Account. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (4):532-541.
    Here is the doubt that triggers my inquiry: I have two beliefs that are apparently at odds. The first is that we should never kill; the second, that we should always attempt to alleviate pain. The apparent conflict between these beliefs arises from the fact that death may constitute the ultimate pain relief.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  28
    Mary B. Mahowald (2000). Christian Munthe, Pure Selection: The Ethics of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Choosing Children Without Abortion. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (4):393-397.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  8
    Mary B. Mahowald (1987). Sex-Role Stereotypes in Medicine. Hypatia 2 (2):21 - 38.
    I argue for compatibility between feminism and medicine by developing a model of the physician-other relationship which is essentially egalitarian. This entails rejection of (a) a paternalistic model which reinforces sex-role stereotypes, (b) a maternalistic model which exclusively emphasizes patient autonomy, and (c) a model which focuses on the physician's conscience. The model I propose (parentalism) captures the complexity and dynamism of the physician-other relationship, by stressing mutuality in respect for autonomy and regard for each other's interests.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  22
    Mary B. Mahowald (2008). Babies by (Intelligent) Design? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51 (4):629-635.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  7
    Mary Briody Mahowald (2004). Prenatal Testing. Hypatia 19 (3):216-221.
  27.  8
    Mary B. Mahowald (1987). Feminism and Medicine. Journal of Social Philosophy 18 (1):3-11.
  28.  1
    Mary Mahowald & Virginia Abernethy (1985). When a Mentally Ill Woman Refuses Abortion. Hastings Center Report 15 (2):22-23.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  6
    Mary Mahowald (1989). Beyond Abortion:Refusal of Caesarean Section. Bioethics 3 (2):106–121.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  2
    Mary Briody Mahowald (ed.) (1983). Philosophy of Woman: An Anthology of Classic and Current Concepts. Hackett.
    **** Revision of the second edition of 1983 (cited in BCL3). Now arranged in chronological order, with a new introduction and headnotes. Annotation copyright by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31. Mary B. Mahowald (1996). A Feminist Standpoint for Genetics. Journal of Clinical Ethics 7 (4):333.
  32.  6
    Mary Mahowald (1998). Is Feminism Compatible with Advocacy for the Disabled? Social Philosophy Today 14:271-283.
  33. Mary B. Mahowald (1995). Person. Encyclopedia of Bioethics 4:1934-1940.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  7
    Mary Mahowald (1976). Peirce's Concepts of God and Religion. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (4):367 - 377.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  17
    Stephen G. Post & Mary B. Mahowald (1996). Reflections on Adoption Ethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5 (3):430.
    Adoption, from the Latin opiate, “to choose,” means “to take into a relationship, especially another's child as one's own”. The word implies a permanent taking of responsibility. While the assumption that biological parents should rear their children is vital to society, adoption provides an alternative that is sometimes necessary.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  17
    Leonard J. Weber & Mary B. Mahowald (1991). Should HECs Assess Whether 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standards Have Been Met Before Recommending the Discontinuation of Life Support, Including Nutrition and Fluids? HEC Forum 3 (5):299-301.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  19
    Mary B. Mahowald (1973). Marx's `Gemeinschaft': Another Interpretation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 33 (4):472-488.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  11
    Mary B. Mahowald (1988). Power and Professional Life. Social Philosophy Today 1:257-269.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  16
    Mary B. Mahowald (2010). Protocell Research and Its Implications. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (1):136-147.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  5
    Mary B. Mahowald (1990). Symbols and Rights. Hastings Center Report 20 (3):43-44.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  14
    Mary B. Mahowald (1994). No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care, Susan Sherwin. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992. 286 Pp.Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics, Helen Bequaert Holmes and Laura M. Purdy, Eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992. 315 Pp. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (1):149.
  42.  15
    Mary Briody Mahowald (2005). Reproductive Technology: Overcoming the Objections. Hastings Center Report 35 (5):46-47.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  15
    Peter J. Smith & Mary Briody Mahowald (2007). Choosing Children: The Ethical Dilemmas of Genetic Intervention (Review). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 50 (3):471-474.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  14
    Mary B. Mahowald (2000). Ruth Macklin, Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine:Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine. Ethics 110 (4):849-850.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  6
    Mary Briody Mahowald (2007). Mass Hysteria: Medicine, Culture, and Mothers' Bodies (Review). Hypatia 22 (3):216-218.
  46.  2
    Mary B. Mahowald (1993). Embryos and Rights. Social Philosophy Today 8:195-204.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  12
    Lois Margaret Nora & Mary B. Mahowald (1996). Neural Fetal Tissue Transplants: Old and New Issues. Zygon 31 (4):615-632.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  9
    Mary Briody Mahowald (1989). Possibilities for Moral Agency in Children. Social Philosophy Today 2:275-285.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  11
    Mary Briody Mahowald (2003). Reflections on the Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46 (1):131-141.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  16
    Mary B. Mahowald & Anthony P. Mahowald (2002). Embryonic Stem Cell Retrieval and a Possible Ethical Bypass. American Journal of Bioethics 2 (1):42 – 43.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 104