78 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Massimiliano Carrara (University of Padua)
  1. Massimiliano Carrara, Pawel Garbacz & Pieter E. Vermaas (2011). If Engineering Function is a Family Resemblance Concept: Assessing Three Formalization Strategies. Applied Ontology 6 (2):141-163.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  2. Julien Murzi & Massimiliano Carrara (2014). More Reflections on Consequence. Logique Et Analyse 227:223-258.
    This special issue collects together nine new essays on logical consequence :the relation obtaining between the premises and the conclusion of a logically valid argument. The present paper is a partial, and opinionated,introduction to the contemporary debate on the topic. We focus on two influential accounts of consequence, the model-theoretic and the proof-theoretic, and on the seeming platitude that valid arguments necessarilypreserve truth. We briefly discuss the main objections these accounts face, as well as Hartry Field’s contention that such objections (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Bjørn Jespersen & Massimiliano Carrara (2013). A New Logic of Technical Malfunction. Studia Logica 101 (3):547-581.
    Aim of the paper is to present a new logic of technical malfunction. The need for this logic is motivated by a simple-sounding philosophical question: Is a malfunctioning corkscrew, which fails to uncork bottles, nonetheless a corkscrew? Or in general terms, is a malfunctioning F, which fails to do what Fs do, nonetheless an F? We argue that ‘malfunctioning’ denotes the modifier Malfunctioning rather than a property, and that the answer depends on whether Malfunctioning is subsective or privative. If subsective, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4. Bjørn Jespersen & Massimiliano Carrara (2011). Two Conceptions of Technical Malfunction. Theoria 77 (2):117-138.
    The topic of this paper is the notion of technical (as opposed to biological) malfunction. It is shown how to form the property being a malfunctioning F from the property F and the property modifier malfunctioning (a mapping taking a property to a property). We present two interpretations of malfunctioning. Both interpretations agree that a malfunctioning F lacks the dispositional property of functioning as an F. However, its subsective interpretation entails that malfunctioning Fs are Fs, whereas its privative interpretation entails (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  5.  50
    Enrico Martino & Massimiliano Carrara (2010). To Be is to Be the Object of a Possible Act of Choice. Studia Logica 96 (2):289-313.
    Aim of the paper is to revise Boolos’ reinterpretation of second-order monadic logic in terms of plural quantification ([4], [5]) and expand it to full second order logic. Introducing the idealization of plural acts of choice, performed by a suitable team of agents, we will develop a notion of plural reference . Plural quantification will be then explained in terms of plural reference. As an application, we will sketch a structuralist reconstruction of second-order arithmetic based on the axiom of infinite (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  6.  50
    Massimiliano Carrara & Pieter E. Vermaas (2009). The Fine-Grained Metaphysics of Artifactual and Biological Functional Kinds. Synthese 169 (1):125 - 143.
    In this paper we consider the emerging position in metaphysics that artifact functions characterize real kinds of artifacts. We analyze how it can circumvent an objection by David Wiggins (Sameness and substance renewed, 2001, 87) and then argue that this position, in comparison to expert judgments, amounts to an interesting fine-grained metaphysics: taking artifact functions as (part of the) essences of artifacts leads to distinctions between principles of activity of artifacts that experts in technology have not yet made. We show, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  7. Francesco Berto & Massimiliano Carrara (2009). To Exist and to Count: A Note on the Minimalist View. Dialectica 63 (3):343-356.
    Sometimes mereologists have problems with counting. We often don't want to count the parts of maximally connected objects as full-fledged objects themselves, and we don't want to count discontinuous objects as parts of further, full-fledged objects. But whatever one takes "full-fledged object" to mean, the axioms and theorems of classical, extensional mereology commit us to the existence both of parts and of wholes – all on a par, included in the domain of quantification – and this makes mereology look counterintuitive (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  3
    Gianluigi Bellin, Massimiliano Carrara & Daniele Chiffi (2015). On an Intuitionistic Logic for Pragmatics. Journal of Logic and Computation:doi: 10.1093/logcom/exv036.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  16
    Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino (2015). Grounding Megethology on Plural Reference. Studia Logica 103 (4):697-711.
    In Mathematics is megethology Lewis reconstructs set theory combining mereology with plural quantification. He introduces megethology, a powerful framework in which one can formulate strong assumptions about the size of the universe of individuals. Within this framework, Lewis develops a structuralist class theory, in which the role of classes is played by individuals. Thus, if mereology and plural quantification are ontologically innocent, as Lewis maintains, he achieves an ontological reduction of classes to individuals. Lewis’work is very attractive. However, the alleged (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  30
    Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino (2016). The Mereological Foundation of Megethology. Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (2):227-235.
    In Mathematics is megethology. Philosophia Mathematica, 1, 3–23) David K. Lewis proposes a structuralist reconstruction of classical set theory based on mereology. In order to formulate suitable hypotheses about the size of the universe of individuals without the help of set-theoretical notions, he uses the device of Boolos’ plural quantification for treating second order logic without commitment to set-theoretical entities. In this paper we show how, assuming the existence of a pairing function on atoms, as the unique assumption non expressed (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino (2009). On the Ontological Commitment of Mereology. Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):164-174.
    In Parts of Classes (1991) and Mathematics Is Megethology (1993) David Lewis defends both the innocence of plural quantification and of mereology. However, he himself claims that the innocence of mereology is different from that of plural reference, where reference to some objects does not require the existence of a single entity picking them out as a whole. In the case of plural quantification . Instead, in the mereological case: (Lewis, 1991, p. 87). The aim of the paper is to (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12. Massimiliano Carrara & Davide Fassio (2011). Why Knowledge Should Not Be Typed: An Argument Against the Type Solution to the Knowability Paradox. Theoria 77 (2):180-193.
    The Knowability Paradox is a logical argument to the effect that, if there are truths not actually known, then there are unknowable truths. Recently, Alexander Paseau and Bernard Linsky have independently suggested a possible way to counter this argument by typing knowledge. In this article, we argue against their proposal that if one abstracts from other possible independent considerations supporting reasons for typing knowledge and considers the motivation for a type-theoretic approach with respect to the Knowability Paradox alone, there is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Massimiliano Carrara & Achille C. Varzi (2001). Ontological Commitment and Reconstructivism. Erkenntnis 55 (1):33-50.
    Some forms of analytic reconstructivism take natural language (and common sense at large) to be ontologically opaque: ordinary sentences must be suitably rewritten or paraphrased before questions of ontological commitment may be raised. Other forms of reconstructivism take the commitment of ordinary language at face value, but regard it as metaphysically misleading: common-sense objects exist, but they are not what we normally think they are. This paper is an attempt to clarify and critically assess some common limits of these two (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14.  25
    Massimiliano Carrara & Giorgio Lando (2016). Composition, Indiscernibility, Coreferentiality. Erkenntnis 81 (1):119-142.
    According to strong composition as identity, the logical principles of one–one and plural identity can and should be extended to the relation between a whole and its parts. Otherwise, composition would not be legitimately regarded as an identity relation. In particular, several defenders of strong CAI have attempted to extend Leibniz’s Law to composition. However, much less attention has been paid to another, not less important feature of standard identity: a standard identity statement is true iff its terms are coreferential. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  2
    Massimiliano Carrara, Daniele Chiffi & Ciro De Florio (2016). Assertions and Hypotheses: A Logical Framework for Their Opposition Relations. Logic Journal of the IGPL:Doi 10.1093/jigpal/jzw036.
    Following the speech act theory, we take hypotheses and assertions as linguistic acts with different illocutionary forces. We assume that a hypothesis is justified if there is at least a scintilla of evidence for the truth of its propositional content, while an assertion is justified when there is conclusive evidence that its propositional content is true. Here we extend the logical treatment for assertions given by Dalla Pozza and Garola (1995, Erkenntnis, 43, 81–109) by outlining a pragmatic logic for assertions (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  51
    Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino (2011). On the Infinite in Mereology with Plural Quantification. Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):54-62.
    In Lewis reconstructs set theory using mereology and plural quantification (MPQ). In his recontruction he assumes from the beginning that there is an infinite plurality of atoms, whose size is equivalent to that of the set theoretical universe. Since this assumption is far beyond the basic axioms of mereology, it might seem that MPQ do not play any role in order to guarantee the existence of a large infinity of objects. However, we intend to demonstrate that mereology and plural quantification (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  3
    Pieter E. Vermaas, Massimiliano Carrara, Stefano Borgo & Pawel Garbacz (2013). The Design Stance and its Artefacts. Synthese 190 (6):1131-1152.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  13
    Massimiliano Carrara (2015). Preliminaries to a Logic of Malfunction. In Pavel Arazim Michal Dancak (ed.), The Logica Yearbook. College Publications 33-47.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  54
    Massimiliano Carrara & Daria Mingardo (2013). Artifact Categorization. Trends and Problems. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):351-373.
    The general question (G) How do we categorize artifacts? can be subject to three different readings: an ontological, an epistemic and a semantic one. According to the ontological reading, asking (G) is equivalent to asking in virtue of what properties, if any, a certain artifact is an instance of some artifact kind: (O) What is it for an artifact a to belong to kind K? According to the epistemic reading, when we ask (G) we are investigating what properties of the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Ciro de Florio, Massimiliano Carrara & Daniele Chiffi, On Pragmatic Denial.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  14
    Roberto Ciuni, Giuliano Torrengo, Massimiliano Carrara & Julien Murzi (2015). Untimely Reviews. Topoi 34 (1):295-295.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  59
    Massimiliano Carrara & Elisabetta Sacchi (2007). Cardinality and Identity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (5):539 - 556.
    P.T. Geach has maintained (see, e.g., Geach (1967/1968)) that identity (as well as dissimilarity) is always relative to a general term. According to him, the notion of absolute identity has to be abandoned and replaced by a multiplicity of relative identity relations for which Leibniz's Law - which says that if two objects are identical they have the same properties - does not hold. For Geach relative identity is at least as good as Frege's cardinality thesis which he takes to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  20
    Massimiliano Carrara & Silvia Gaio, Approximating Identity Criteria.
    Identity criteria are used to confer ontological respectability: Only entities with clearly determined identity criteria are ontologically acceptable. From a logical point of view, identity criteria should mirror the identity relation in being reflexive, symmetrical, and transitive. However, this logical constraint is only rarely met. More precisely, in some cases, the relation representing the identity condition fails to be transitive. We consider the proposals given so far to give logical adequacy to inadequate identity conditions. We focus on the most refined (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  12
    Marzia Soavi & Massimiliano Carrara (2010). Copies, Replicas, and Counterfeits of Artworks and Artefacts. The Monist 93 (3):414-432.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  19
    Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino, On the Alleged Innocence of Mereology.
    In Parts of Classes [Lewis 1991] David Lewis attempts to draw a sharp contrast between mereology and set theory and to assimilate mereology to logic. He argues that, like logic but unlike set theory, mereology is “ontologically innocent”. In mereology, given certain objects, no further ontological commitment is required for the existence of their sum. On the contrary, by accepting set theory, given certain objects, a further commitment is required for the existence of the set of them. The latter – (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  18
    Julien Murzi & Massimiliano Carrara (2015). Paradox and Logical Revision. A Short Introduction. Topoi 34 (1):7-14.
    Logical orthodoxy has it that classical first-order logic, or some extension thereof, provides the right extension of the logical consequence relation. However, together with naïve but intuitive principles about semantic notions such as truth, denotation, satisfaction, and possibly validity and other naïve logical properties, classical logic quickly leads to inconsistency, and indeed triviality. At least since the publication of Kripke’s Outline of a theory of truth , an increasingly popular diagnosis has been to restore consistency, or at least non-triviality, by (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  16
    Massimiliano Carrara & Silvia Gaio (2012). Towards a Formal Account of Identity Criteria. In Majda Trobok Nenad Miščević & Berislav Žarnić (eds.), Between Logic and Reality. Springer 227--242.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  58
    Massimiliano Carrara & Giuseppe Spolaore (2011). Il Mondo Messo a Fuoco. Storie di Allucinazioni E Miopie Filosofiche (The World in Focus. Stories of Philosophical Hallucinations and Myopias) – By Achille Varzi. Dialectica 65 (3):473-477.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  10
    Massimiliano Carrara & Daniele Chiffi, The Knowability Paradox in the Light of a Logic for Pragmatics.
    The Knowability Paradox is a logical argument showing that if all truths are knowable in principle, then all truths are, in fact, known. Many strategies have been suggested in order to avoid the paradoxical conclusion. A family of solutions –ncalled logical revision – has been proposed to solve the paradox, revising the logic underneath, with an intuitionistic revision included. In this paper, we focus on so-called revisionary solutions to the paradox – solutions that put the blame on the underlying logic. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  31
    Massimiliano Carrara & Pierdaniele Giaretta (2004). The Many Facets of Identity Criteria. Dialectica 58 (2):221–232.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  14
    Massimiliano Carrara & Davide Fassio, The Knowability Paradox, Perfectibility of Science and Reductionism.
    A logical argument known as Fitch’s Paradox of Knowability, starting from the assumption that every truth is knowable, leads to the consequence that every truth is also actually known. Then, given the ordinary fact that some true propositions are not actually known, it concludes, by modus tollens, that there are unknowable truths. The main literature on the topic has been focusing on the threat the argument poses to the so called semantic anti-realist theories, which aim to epistemically characterize the notion (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  28
    Giovanni Boniolo & Massimiliano Carrara (2004). On Biological Identity. Biology and Philosophy 19 (3):443-457.
    In our paper, we propose a relativisticand metaphysically neutral identity criterionfor biological entities. We start from thecriterion of genidentity proposed by K. Lewinand H. Reichenbach. Then we enrich it to renderit more philosophical powerful and so capableof dealing with the real transformations thatoccur in the extremely variegated biologicalworld.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  11
    Julien Murzi & Massimiliano Carrara (2014). Denial and Disagreement. Topoi (1):1-11.
    We cast doubts on the suggestion, recently made by Graham Priest, that glut theorists may express disagreement with the assertion of A by denying A. We show that, if denial is to serve as a means to express disagreement, it must be exclusive, in the sense of being correct only if what is denied is false only. Hence, it can’t be expressed in the glut theorist’s language, essentially for the same reasons why Boolean negation can’t be expressed in such a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  8
    Massimiliano Carrara & Davide Fassio (2009). Logically Unknowable Propositions: A Criticism to Tennant's Three-Partition of Anti-Cartesian Propositions. In P. Hanna (ed.), An Anthology of Philosophical Studies, Vol.2. Atiner 181-194.
    The Knowability Paradox is a logical argument that, starting from the plainly innocent assumption that every true proposition is knowable, reaches the strong conclusion that every true proposition is known; i.e. if there are unknown truths, there are unknowable truths. The paradox has been considered a problem for every theory assuming the Knowability Principle, according to which all truths are knowable and, in particular, for semantic anti-realist theories. A well known criticism to the Knowability Paradox is the so called restriction (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  31
    Massimiliano Carrara (2009). Relative Identity and the Number of Artifacts. Techne 13 (2):108-122.
    Relativists maintain that identity is always relative to a general term (RI). According to them, the notion of absolute identity has to be abandoned and replaced by a multiplicity of relative identity relations for which Leibniz’s Law does not hold. For relativists RI is at least as good as the Fregean cardinality thesis (FC), which contends that an ascription of cardinality is always relative to a concept specifying what, in any specific case, counts as a unit. The same train of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  12
    Massimiliano Carrara & Davide Fassio (2010). Perfected Science and the Knowability Paradox. In M. M. D’Agostino, G. Giorello, F. Laudisa, T. Pievani & C. Sinigaglia (eds.), New Essays in Logic and Philosophy of Science. London College Publications
    In "The Limits of Science" N. Rescher introduces a logical argument known as the Knowability Paradox, according to which, if every true proposition is knowable, then every true proposition is known, i.e. if there are unknown truths, there are unknowable truths. Rescher argues that the Knowability Paradox, giving evidence to a limit of our knowledge (the existence of unknowable truths) could be used for arguing against perfected science. In this article we present two criticisms against Rescher's argument.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  6
    Marzia Soavi, Silvia Gaio & Massimiliano Carrara (2014). Two Arguments Against Antirealism in Relation to Artefact Kinds. In Javier Cumpa, Greg Jesson & Guido Bonino (eds.), Defending Realism: Ontological and Epistemological Investigations. De Gruyter 9-28.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  13
    Massimiliano Carrara & Silvia Gaio, On the Logical Adequacy of Identity Criteria.
    From a logical point of view, identity criteria should mirror the identity relation in being reflexive, symmetrical, and transitive. However, the relation representing the identity condition fails to be transitive in many cases. We consider the proposals given so far to give logical adequacy to inadequate identity conditions. We focus on the most refined proposal and expand its formal framework by taking into account two further aspects that we consider essential in the formal treatment of identity criteria: contexts and granular (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  3
    Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino (2010). To Be is to Be the Object of a Possible Act of Choice. Studia Logica 96 (2):289-313.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  31
    Massimiliano Carrara & Marzia Soavi (2008). Ontology for Information Systems: Artefacts as a Case Study. [REVIEW] Mind and Society 7 (2):143-156.
    The goal of the paper is to analyse some specific features of a very central concept for top-level ontologies for information systems: i.e. the concept of artefact. Specifically, we analyse the relation to be a copy of that is strongly linked to the notion of artefact and—as we will demonstrate—could be useful to distinguish artefacts from objects of other kinds. Firstly, we outline some intuitive and commonsensical reasons for the need of a clarification of the notion of artefact in ontologies (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  4
    Gianluigi Bellin, Massimiliano Carrara, Daniele Chiffi & Alessandro Menti (forthcoming). Errata Corrige to “Pragmatic and Dialogic Interpretation of Bi-Intuitionism. Part I”. Logic and Logical Philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  35
    Massimiliano Carrara & Davide Fassio, Reductionism and Perfectibility of Science.
    Nicholas Rescher, in The Limits of Science (1984), argued that: «perfected science is a mirage; complete knowledge a chimera» . He reached the above conclusion from a logical argument known as Fitch’s Paradox of Knowability. The argument, starting from the assumption that every truth is knowable, proves that every truth is also actually known and, given that some true propositions are not actually known, it concludes, by modus tollens, that there are unknowable truths. Prima facie, this argument seems to seriously (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  6
    Jan Woleński, Massimiliano Carrara, Roberto Poli, Luigi Dappiano & Sandro Bertoni (1994). Recensioni / Reviews. Axiomathes 5 (2-3):415-435.
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  9
    Massimiliano Carrara, Enrico Martino & Vittorio Morato, On Dialetheic Entailment.
    The entailment connective is introduced by Priest (2006b). It aims to capture, in a dialetheically acceptable way, the informal notion of logical consequence. This connective does not “fall foul” of Curry’s Paradox by invalidating an inference rule called “Absorption” (or “Contraction”) and the classical logical theorem called “Assertion”. In this paper we show that the semantics of entailment, given by Priest in terms of possible worlds, is inadequate. In particular, we will argue that Priest’s counterexamples to Absorption and Assertion use (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  2
    Massimiliano Carrara & Luigi Dappiano (1993). RecensioniReviews. Axiomathes 4 (3):463-470.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  2
    Gianluigi Bellin, Massimiliano Carrara, Daniele Chiffi & Alessandro Menti (2014). Pragmatic and Dialogic Interpretations of Bi-Intuitionism. Part I. Logic and Logical Philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  7
    Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino (2011). Four Theses on the Alleged Innocence of Mereology. Humana. Mente. Journal of Philosophical Studies 19:57-77.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  13
    Massimiliano Carrara & Marzia Soavi (2010). Copies, Replicas, and Counterfeits of Artworks and Artefacts. The Monist 93 (3):414-432.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  6
    Massimiliano Carrara (2002). Alcune osservazioni sull'identità degli indiscernibili. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 1.
    In questo articolo l’autore intende fornire una risposta a questo quesito: è possibile identificare una specificazione di proprietà tale da evitare alcune obiezioni standard al Principio d’identità degli indiscernibili ? dove con l’espressione "obiezioni standard" ci si riferisce a quell’insieme di argomenti proposti da M. Black e P.F. Strawson contro . Si argomenta che, se si segue Leibniz, ci si trova di fronte ad una empasse. Infatti, se si vuole evitare l’accusa di circolarità nei confronti di si deve negare l’esistenza (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  19
    Jan Woleński, Massimiliano Carrara, Roberto Poli, Luigi Dappiano & Sandro Bertoni (1994). Recensioni. Axiomathes 5 (2-3):465-468.
1 — 50 / 78