55 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Matthew Henry Kramer (Cambridge University)
  1. Matthew H. Kramer (2013). Hart, HLA. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Matthew H. Kramer (2013). In Defense of Hart. In Wil Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oup Oxford. 22.
    In Legality Scott Shapiro seeks to provide the motivation for the development of his own elaborate account of law by undertaking a critique of H.L.A. Hart's jurisprudential theory. Hart maintained that every legal system is underlain by a rule of recognition through which officials of the system identify the norms that belong to the system as laws. Shapiro argues that Hart's remarks on the rule of recognition are confused and that his model of lawis consequently untenable. Shapiro contends that a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Matthew H. Kramer (2013). Retributivism in the Spirit of Finnis. In John Keown & Robert P. George (eds.), Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis. Oxford University Press. 167.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Matthew H. Kramer (2013). Some Doubts About Alternatives to the Interest Theory of Rights. Ethics 123 (2):245-263.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Matthew H. Kramer (2013). The Purgative Rationale for the Death Penalty: Replies to Steiker and Danaher. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-16.
    This article defends my 2011 book “The Ethics of Capital Punishment” against the thoughtful critiques written by Carol Steiker and John Danaher respectively. It does not attempt to respond to every point of contention in the two critiques, but concentrates instead on a few of the main points from each of them.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Matthew H. Kramer (2012). Michael Moore on Torture, Morality, and Law. Ratio Juris 25 (4):472-495.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Matthew H. Kramer (2012). What Is Legal Philosophy? Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):125-134.
    This article delineates some of the main issues that are debated by philosophers of law. It explores the connections between legal philosophy and other areas of philosophy, while also seeking to specify the distinctiveness of many of the concerns that have preoccupied philosophers of law. It illustrates its abstract points with examples focused on the separability of law and morality, the nature of the rule of law, the nature of rights, justifications for the imposition of punishment, and the identification of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Rowan Cruft, Matthew H. Kramer & Mark R. Reiff (eds.) (2011). Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff. Oxford University Press.
    This volume collects essays by leading criminal law theorists to explore the principal themes in his work.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Matthew H. Kramer (2011). Freedom and the Rule of Law. In Jerzy Stelmach & Bartosz Brożek (eds.), The Normativity of Law. Copernicus Center Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Matthew H. Kramer (2011). The Ethics of Capital Punishment: A Philosophical Investigation of Evil and its Consequences. OUP Oxford.
    Debate has long been waged over the morality of capital punishment, with standard arguments in its favour being marshalled against familiar arguments that oppose the practice. In The Ethics of Capital Punishment, Matthew Kramer takes a fresh look at the philosophical arguments on which the legitimacy of the death penalty stands or falls, and he develops a novel justification of that penalty for a limited range of cases. -/- The book pursues both a project of critical debunking of the familiar (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Stephen De Wijze, Matthew H. Kramer & Ian Carter (eds.) (2009). Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges. Routledge.
    Throughout the English-speaking world, and in the many other countries where analytic philosophy is studied, Hillel Steiner is esteemed as one of the foremost contemporary political philosophers. This volume is designed as a festschrift for Steiner and as an important collection of philosophical essays in its own right. The editors have assembled a roster of highly distinguished international contributors, all of whom are eager to pay tribute to Steiner by focusing on topics on which he himself has concentrated. Some of (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Matthew H. Kramer (2009). Consistency is Hardly Ever Enough: Reflections on Hillel Steiner's Methodology. In Stephen De Wijze, Matthew H. Kramer & Ian Carter (eds.), Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges. Routledge.
  13. Matthew H. Kramer (2009). Moral Principles and Legal Validity. Ratio Juris 22 (1):44-61.
    Two recent high-quality articles, including one in this journal, have challenged the Inclusivist and Incorporationist varieties of legal positivism. David Lefkowitz and Michael Giudice, writing from perspectives heavily influenced by the work of Joseph Raz, have endeavored—in sophisticated and interestingly distinct ways—to vindicate Raz's contention that moral principles are never among the law-validating criteria in any legal system nor among the laws that are applied as binding bases for adjudicative and administrative decisions in such a system. The present article (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Matthew H. Kramer (2009). Moral Realism as a Moral Doctrine. Wiley-Blackwell.
    In this major new book, Matthew Kramer seeks to establish two main conclusions.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Matthew H. Kramer (2009). Brian Leiter: Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):107-110.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Ian Carter & Matthew H. Kramer (2008). How Changes in One's Preferences Can Affect One's Freedom (and How They Cannot): A Reply to Dowding and Van Hees. Economics and Philosophy 24 (1):81-96.
  17. Matthew H. Kramer (2008). Contents Versus Existence-Conditions: A Brief Reply to John Morss. American Journal of Jurisprudence 53 (1):101-103.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Matthew H. Kramer (2008). Is Law's Conventionality Consistent with Law's Objectivity? Res Publica 14 (4):241-252.
    Legal positivism’s multi-faceted insistence on the separability of law and morality includes an insistence on the thoroughly conventional status of legal norms as legal norms. Yet the positivist affirmation of the conventionality of law may initially seem at odds with the mind-independence of the existence and contents and implications of legal norms. Mind-independence, a central aspect of legal objectivity, has been seen by some theorists as incompatible with the mind-dependence of conventions. Such a perception of incompatibility has led some anti-positivist (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Matthew H. Kramer (2008). Review of Arthur Ripstein (Ed.), Ronald Dworkin. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Matthew H. Kramer (ed.) (2008). The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    This book is the product of a major British Academy Symposium held in 2007 to mark the centenary of the birth of H.L.A. Hart, the most important legal philosopher and one of the most important political philosophers of the twentieth century. -/- The book brings together contributions from seventeen of the world's foremost legal and political philosophers who explore the many subjects in which Hart produced influential work. Each essay engages in an original analysis of philosophical problems that were tackled (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Matthew H. Kramer (ed.) (2008). The Legacy of H. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Matthew H. Kramer (2008). The Quality of Freedom. OUP Oxford.
    At least since the publication of Isaiah Berlin's famous essay "Two Concepts of Liberty" nearly half a century ago, political philosophers have argued vigorously over the relative merits of "positive" and "negative" accounts of freedom. Matthew Kramer writes squarely within the negative-liberty tradition, but he incorporates a number of ideas that are quite often associated with theories of positive liberty. Much of The Quality of Freedom is devoted to elaborating the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of particular freedoms (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Matthew H. Kramer (2008). Wilfrid E. Rumble, Doing Austin Justice: The Reception of John Austin's Philosophy of Law in Nineteenth-Century England (London and New York: Continuum, 2005), Pp. XI + 270. [REVIEW] Utilitas 20 (2):252-254.
  24. Matthew H. Kramer (2008). When Is There Not One Right Answer? American Journal of Jurisprudence 53 (1):49-68.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Matthew H. Kramer (2008). Where Law and Morality Meet. Oxford University Press.
    How are law and morality connected, how do they interact, and in what ways are they distinct? In Part I of this book, Matthew Kramer argues that moral principles can enter into the law of any jurisdiction. He contends that legal officials can invoke moral principles as laws for resolving disputes, and that they can also invoke them as threshold tests which ordinary laws must satisfy. In opposition to many other theorists, Kramer argues that these functions of moral principles are (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Ian Carter, Matthew H. Kramer & Hillel Steiner (eds.) (2007). Freedom: A Philosophical Anthology. Blackwell Pub..
    Edited by leading contributors to the literature, Freedom: An Anthology is the most complete anthology on social, political and economic freedom ever compiled. Offers a broad guide to the vast literature on social, political and economic freedom. Contains selections from the best scholarship of recent decades as well as classic writings from Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau and Kant among others. General and sectional introductions help to orient the reader. Compiled and edited by three important contributors to the field.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Matthew H. Kramer (2007). Objectivity and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press.
    What is objectivity? What is the rule of law? Are the operations of legal systems objective? If so, in what ways and to what degrees are they objective? Does anything of importance depend on the objectivity of law? These are some of the principal questions addressed by Matthew H. Kramer in this lucid and wide-ranging study that introduces readers to vital areas of philosophical enquiry.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Matthew H. Kramer (2007). Why The Axioms and Theorems of Arithmetic Are Not Legal Norms. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (3):555-562.
    Ronald Dworkin has long criticized legal positivists for their efforts to distinguish between legal and non-legal standards of conduct that are incumbent on people. Recently, Dworkin has broached this criticism in his hostile account of the debates between Incorporationist Legal Positivists and Exclusive Legal Positivists. Specifically, he has maintained that Incorporationists cannot avoid the unpalatable conclusion that the axioms and theorems of arithmetic are legal norms. This article shows why such a conclusion is indeed avoidable and why Dworkin's criticism is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Matthew H. Kramer & Hillel Steiner (2007). Theories of Rights: Is There a Third Way? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (2):281-310.
    Some important recent articles, including one in this journal, have sought to devise theories of rights that can transcend the longstanding debate between the Interest Theory and the Will Theory. The present essay argues that those efforts fail and that the Interest Theory and the Will Theory withstand the criticisms that have been levelled against them. To be sure, the criticisms have been valuable in that they have prompted the amplification and clarification of the two dominant theories of rights; but (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Matthew H. Kramer (2005). Legal and Moral Obligation. In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell Pub.. 179--190.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Matthew H. Kramer (2005). Moral Rights and the Limits of the Ought-Implies-Can Principle: Why Impeccable Precautions Are No Excuse. Inquiry 48 (4):307 – 355.
    This essay argues against the commonly held view that "ought" implies "can" in the domain of morality. More specifically, I contest the notion that nobody should ever be held morally responsible for failing to avoid the infliction of any harm that he or she has not been able to avoid through all reasonably feasible precautions in the carrying out of some worthwhile activity. The article explicates the concept of a moral right in order to show why violations of moral rights (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Matthew H. Kramer (2003). Essere liberi senza avere scelta. Filosofia Oggi 8 (1):51.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Matthew H. Kramer (2003). On the Counterfactual Dimension of Negative Liberty. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (1):63-92.
    This article explores some implications of the counterfactual aspect of freedom and unfreedom. Because actions can be unprevented even if they are not undertaken, and conversely because actions can be prevented even if they are not attempted and are thus not overtly thwarted, any adequate account of negative liberty must ponder numerous counterfactual chains of events. Each person's freedom or unfreedom is affected not only by what others in fact do, but also by what they are disposed to do. Their (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Matthew H. Kramer (2002). Throwing Light on the Role of Moral Principles in the Law: Further Reflections. Legal Theory 8 (1):115-143.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Matthew H. Kramer (2001). Dogmas and Distortions: Legal Positivism Defended. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (4):673-701.
    In a recent full‐length review of Matthew Kramer's In Defense of Legal Positivism, David Dyzenhaus has attacked legal positivists' accounts of adjudication and their views of the relationship between law and morality. The present essay defends legal positivism against his strictures, by arguing that he has misunderstood specific texts and the general lines of enquiry which the positivists pursue.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Matthew H. Kramer (2001). Freedom, Unfreedom and Skinner's Hobbes. Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (2):204–216.
  37. Matthew H. Kramer (2001). On the Unavoidability of Actions: Quentin Skinner, Thomas Hobbes, and the Modern Doctrine of Negative Liberty. Inquiry 44 (3):315 – 330.
    During the past few decades, Quentin Skinner has been one of the most prominent critics of the ideas about negative liberty that have developed out of the writings of Isaiah Berlin. Among Skinner?s principal charges against the contemporary doctrine of negative liberty is the claim that the proponents of that doctrine have overlooked the putative fact that people can be made unfree to refrain from undertaking particular actions. In connection with this matter, Skinner contrasts the present-day theories with the prototypical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Matthew H. Kramer (ed.) (2001). Rights, Wrongs, and Responsibilities. Palgrave.
    In this wide-ranging investigation of leading issues in contemporary legal and political philosophy, distinguished philosophers and legal theorists tackle issues such as the rights of animals, the role of public-policy considerations in legal reasoning, the appropriateness of compensation as a means of rectifying mishaps and misdeeds, the extent of individuals' responsibility for the consequences of their choices, and the culpability of failed attempts to commit crimes.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Margaret Gilbert, Andrew Mason, Elizabeth S. Anderson, J. David Velleman, Matthew H. Kramer, Michele M. Moody‐Adams & Martha C. Nussbaum (1999). 10. Lucius T. Outlaw, Jr., On Race and Philosophy Lucius T. Outlaw, Jr., On Race and Philosophy (Pp. 454-456). Ethics 109 (2).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Matthew H. Kramer (1999). Another Look at the Problem of the Unexpected Examination. Dialogue 38 (03):491-.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Matthew H. Kramer (1999). Coming to Grips with the Law. Legal Theory 5 (2):171-200.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Matthew H. Kramer (1999). In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings. Oxford University Press.
    This book is an uncompromising defense of legal positivism that insists on the separability of law and morality. After distinguishing among three facets of morality, Kramer explores a variety of ways in which law has been perceived as integrally connected to each of those facets. The book concludes with a detailed discussion of the obligation to obey the law--a discussion that highlights the strengths of legal positivism in the domain of political philosophy as much as in the domain of jurisprudence.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Matthew H. Kramer (1999). In the Realm of Legal and Moral Philosophy: Critical Encounters. St. Martin's Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Matthew H. Kramer (1999). Requirements, Reasons, and Raz: Legal Positivism and Legal Duties. Ethics 109 (2):375-407.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Matthew H. Kramer (1998). A Debate Over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries. Clarendon Press.
    This collection of essays forms a lively debate over the fundamental characteristics of legal and moral rights. The essays examine whether rights fundamentally protect individuals' interests or whether they instead fundamentally enable individuals to make choices.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Matthew H. Kramer & Nigel E. Simmonds (1998). No Better Reasons: A Reply to Alan Gewirth. Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):131-139.
    Alan Gewirth has propounded a moral theory which commits him to the view that prescriptions can appropriately be addressed to people who have neither any moral reasons nor any prudential reasons to follow the prescriptions. We highlight the strangeness of Gewirth's position and then show that it undermines his attempt to come up with a supreme moral principle.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Matthew H. Kramer (1997). Hobbes and the Paradoxes of Political Origins. St. Martin's Press.
    This book expounds an analytical method that focuses on paradoxes - a method originally associated with deconstructive philosophy, but bearing little resemblance to the interpretive techniques that have come to be designated as 'deconstruction' in literary studies. The book then applies its paradox-focused method as it undertakes a sustained investigation of Thomas Hobbe's political philosophy. Hobbes's theory of the advent and purpose of government turns out to reveal the impossibility of the very developments which it portrays as indispensable.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Matthew H. Kramer (1997). Justice as Constancy. Law and Philosophy 16 (6):561 - 580.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Matthew H. Kramer (1997). John Locke and the Origins of Private Property: Philosophical Explorations of Individualism, Community, and Equality. Cambridge University Press.
    John Locke's labor theory of property is one of the seminal ideas of political philosophy and served to establish its author's reputation as one of the leading social and political thinkers of all time. Through it Locke addressed many of his most pressing concerns, and earned a reputation as an outstanding spokesman for political individualism - a reputation that lingers widely despite some partial challenges that have been raised in recent years. In this major new study Matthew Kramer offers an (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Matthew H. Kramer (1996). How Not to Oppugn Consequentialism. Philosophical Quarterly 46 (183):213-220.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 55