1. Maureen H. Fitzgerald, Paul A. Phillips & Elisa Yule (2006). The Research Ethics Review Process and Ethics Review Narratives. Ethics and Behavior 16 (4):377 – 395.
    There is a growing body of literature on the research ethics review process, a process that can have important effects on the nature of research in contemporary times. Yet, many people know little about what the actual process entails once an application has been submitted for review. This lack of knowledge can affect researchers and committee members' responses to the review process. Based on ethnographic research on the ethics review process in 5 countries (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United States, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Maureen H. Fitzgerald (2005). Punctuated Equilibrium, Moral Panics and the Ethics Review Process. Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (4):315-338.
    A review of the literature and ethnographic data from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United States, and the United Kingdom on the research ethics review process suggest that moral panics can become triggers for punctuated equilibrium in the review process at both the macro and microlevel, albeit with significantly different levels of magnitude and impact. These data suggest that neither the development of the ethics review process nor the process itself proceeds gradually, but both are characterized by periodic major shifts (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Maureen H. Fitzgerald & Elisa Yule (2004). Open and Closed Committees. Monash Bioethics Review 23 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation