Search results for 'Melanija Marušić' (try it on Scholar)

33 found
Sort by:
  1. Melanija Marušić (2008). A New Philosophy of Society. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 12 (2):209-213.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Berislav Marušić (2011). The Ethics of Belief. Philosophy Compass 6 (1):33-43.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jennifer Smalligan Marušić (2010). Does Hume Hold a Dispositional Account of Belief? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):155-183.score: 30.0
    Philosophical theories about the nature of belief can be roughly classified into two groups: those that treat beliefs as occurrent mental states or episodes and those that treat beliefs as dispositions. David Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature seems to contain a classic example of an occurrence theory of belief. Hume defines 'belief' as 'a lively idea related to or associated with a present impression' (Treatise 1.3.7.5 96).1 This definition suggests that believing is an occurrent mental state, such as judging, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Berislav Marušić (2010). The Desires of Others. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):385-400.score: 30.0
    An influential view, defended by Thomas Scanlon and others, holds that desires are almost never reasons. I seek to resist this view and show that someone who desires something does thereby have a reason to satisfy her desire. To show this, I argue, first, that the desires of some others are reasons for us and, second, that our own desires are no less reason-giving than those of others. In concluding, I emphasize that accepting my view does not commit one to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mindaugas Broga, Goran Mijaljica, Marcin Waligora, Aime Keis & Ana Marusic (2013). Publication Ethics in Biomedical Journals From Countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Science and Engineering Ethics (1):1-11.score: 30.0
    Publication ethics is an important aspect of both the research and publication enterprises. It is particularly important in the field of biomedical science because published data may directly affect human health. In this article, we examine publication ethics policies in biomedical journals published in Central and Eastern Europe. We were interested in possible differences between East European countries that are members of the European Union (Eastern EU) and South-East European countries (South-East Europe) that are not members of the European Union.The (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Berislav Marušić (2010). Skepticism Between Excessiveness and Idleness. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):60-83.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jennifer Smalligan Marusic (2009). Comments on Michael Jacovides “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive”. Philosophia 37 (3):431-436.score: 30.0
    The manuscript includes comments on Michael Jacovides’s paper, “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive.” The paper and comments were delivered at the conference “Meaning and Modern Empiricism” held at Virginia Tech in April 2008. I consider Jacovides’s treatment of Berkeley’s Resemblance Argument and his interpretation of the Master Argument. In particular, I distinguish several ways of understanding the disagreement between Jacovides and Kenneth Winkler over the right way to read the Master Argument.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Berislav Marušić (2010). Beyond the Philosopher's Fear: A Cavellian Reading of Gender, Origin, and Religion in Modern Skepticism, by Ludger Viefhues-Bailey. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):315-320.score: 30.0
  9. Jennifer Smalligan Marušić (2012). Refuting The Whole System? Hume's Attack on Popular Religion in The Natural History of Religion. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):715-736.score: 30.0
    There is reason for genuine puzzlement about Hume's aim in ‘The Natural History of Religion’. Some commentators take the work to be merely a causal investigation into the psychological processes and environmental conditions that are likely to give rise to the first religions, an investigation that has no significant or straightforward implications for the rationality or justification of religious belief. Others take the work to constitute an attack on the rationality and justification of religious belief in general. In contrast to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jennifer Smalligan Marušić (2014). Propositions and Judgments in Locke and Arnauld: A Monstrous and Unholy Union? Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (2):255-280.score: 30.0
    Philosophers have accused locke of holding a view about propositions that simply conflates the formation of a propositional thought with the judgment that a proposition is true, and charged that this has obviously absurd consequences.1 Worse, this account appears not to be unique to Locke: it bears a striking resemblance to one found in both the Port-Royal Logic (the Logic, for short) and the Port-Royal Grammar. In the Logic, this account forms part of the backbone of the traditional logic expounded (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Darko Hren, Dario Sambunjak, Matko Marušić & Ana Marušić (2013). Medical Students' Decisions About Authorship in Disputable Situations: Intervention Study. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):641-651.score: 30.0
    In medicine, professional behavior and ethics are often rule-based. We assessed whether instruction on formal criteria of authorship affected the decision of students about authorship dilemmas and whether they perceive authorship as a conventional or moral concept. A prospective non-randomized intervention study involved 203s year medical students who did (n = 107) or did not (n = 96) received a lecture on International Committee of Medical Journal editors (ICMJE) authorship criteria. Both groups had to read 3 vignettes and answer 4 (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Berislav Marušić (2001). The New Wittgenstein. [REVIEW] Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):83-85.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Rajna Golubic, Mihael Rudes, Natasa Kovacic, Matko Marusic & Ana Marusic (2008). Calculating Impact Factor: How Bibliographical Classification of Journal Items Affects the Impact Factor of Large and Small Journals. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):41-49.score: 30.0
    As bibliographical classification of published journal items affects the denominator in this equation, we investigated how the numerator and denominator of the impact factor (IF) equation were generated for representative journals in two categories of the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). We performed a full text search of the 1st-ranked journal in 2004 JCR category “Medicine, General and Internal” (New England Journal of Medicine, NEJM, IF = 38.570) and 61st-ranked journal (Croatian Medical Journal, CMJ, IF = 0.690), 1st-ranked journal in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Berislav Marušić (2013). Promising Against the Evidence. Ethics 123 (2):292-317.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Berislav Marušić (2013). The Self-Knowledge Gambit. Synthese 190 (12):1977-1999.score: 30.0
    If we hold that perceiving is sufficient for knowing, we can raise a powerful objection to dreaming skepticism: Skeptics assume the implausible KK-principle, because they hold that if we don’t know whether we are dreaming or perceiving p, we don’t know whether p. The rejection of the KK-principle thus suggests an anti-skeptical strategy: We can sacrifice some of our self-knowledge—our second-order knowledge—and thereby save our knowledge of the external world. I call this strategy the Self-Knowledge Gambit. I argue that the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jennifer Smalligan Marušić (2011). Belief and Introspective Knowledge in Treatise 1.3.7. Hume Studies 37 (1):99-122.score: 30.0
    In Treatise 1.3.7 Hume offers two distinct arguments for the view that the difference between believing a matter of fact and simply conceiving of it consists in a difference in the manner of conception.1 For convenience, I will call the two arguments in Treatise 1.3.7 the “No-new-idea Argument” and the “Argument from Disagreement.” Both arguments have an eliminative structure: Hume argues against other possible accounts of belief and concludes that the only hypothesis left standing is the view that the difference (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Matko Marušić, Jadranka Božikov, Vedran Katavić, Darko Hren, Marko Kljaković-Gašpić & Ana Marušić (2004). Authorship in a Small Medical Journal: A Study of Contributorship Statements by Corresponding Authors. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):493-502.score: 30.0
    The authorship criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) are widely accepted in biomedical journals, but many studies in large and prestigious journals show that a considerable proportion of authors do not fulfill these criteria. We investigated authorship contributions in a small medical journal outside the scientific mainstream, to see if poor adherence to authorship criteria is common in biomedical journals. We analyzed statements on research contribution, as checked by the corresponding author, for individual authors of 114 (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Mihael Rudes Rajna Golubic, Matko Marusic Natasa Kovacic & Ana Marusic (2008). Calculating Impact Factor: How Bibliographical Classification of Journal Items Affects the Impact Factor of Large and Small Journals. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1).score: 30.0
    As bibliographical classification of published journal items affects the denominator in this equation, we investigated how the numerator and denominator of the impact factor (IF) equation were generated for representative journals in two categories of the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). We performed a full text search of the 1st-ranked journal in 2004 JCR category “Medicine, General and Internal” ( New England Journal of Medicine , NEJM , IF = 38.570) and 61st-ranked journal ( Croatian Medical Journal , CMJ , (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. M. Marušić (1989). Biological Foundations of Prediction in an Unpredictable Environment. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (4):485-499.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jennifer Smalligan Marušić (2014). Hume on the Projection of Causal Necessity. Philosophy Compass 9 (4):263-273.score: 30.0
    A characteristically Humean pattern of explanation starts by claiming that we have a certain kind of feeling in response to some objects and then takes our having such feelings to provide an explanation of how we come to think of those objects as having some feature that we would not otherwise be able to think of them as having. This core pattern of explanation is what leads Simon Blackburn to dub Hume ‘the first great projectivist.’ This paper critically examines the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jennifer Smalligan Marušić (2013). Reflection and the Stability of Belief: Essays on Descartes, Hume and Reid. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (4):800-803.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. D. Hren, D. Sambunjak, A. Ivanis, M. Marusic & A. Marusic (2007). Perceptions of Authorship Criteria: Effects of Student Instruction and Scientific Experience. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (7):428-432.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. M. Marušiç (1989). Biological Foundations of Prediction in an Unpredictable Environment. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (4):485-499.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Berislav Marušić (2012). Belief and Difficult Action. Philosopher's Index 12 (18):1-30.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. M. Marusiç (1989). Biological Foundations of Prediction in an Unpredictable Environment. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (4):485 - 499.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Ana Marusic (2009). Can Journal Editors Police Animal Welfare? Three Es for Three Rs in Scientific Journals. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (12):66-67.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Prevedla Fera Marusic (2008). Geminos, Concise Exposition of the Meteorology of Poseidonios (the Extant Fragment). Filozofski Vestnik 29 (1):149 - +.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Berislav Marusic (2001). Wittgenstein on Time. Synthesis Philosophica 16 (1):97-102.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Iris Vidmar, Martina Žeželj, Aleksandar Dimitriev, Ivana Zagorac, Senka Suman, Emil Kušan, Ljudevit Hanžek, Snježan Hasnaš, Bruno Ćurko, Goran Grgec, Andrej Ciglar & Dunja Marušić (2008). Filozofski Život. Filozofska Istrazivanja 28 (2):477-507.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Michael Jacovides (2009). Remarks on Smalligan Marusic's Comments. Philosophia 37 (3):437-439.score: 24.0
    The author defends attributing to Berkeley the thesis that we can't conceive of extension in a mind-independent body against criticism from Smalligan Marusic. The author also specifies the resemblance requirements that Berkeley places on conceivability, concedes that the principle that ideas can only be like other ideas is not, strictly speaking, a premise in the Master Argument, and clarifies his views on the relation between possibility and conceivability.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Siniša Crvenković, Melanija Mitrović & Daniel Abraham Romano (2013). Semigroups with Apartness. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 59 (6):407-414.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Dunja Marušić Brezetić, Krunoslav Petrunić, Senka Suman, Snježan Hasnaš, Vinko Grgurev, Ivana Kragić, Tomislav Petković, Gabriela Bašić, Ljudevit Hanžek, Krešimir Babel, Ivana Greguric, Stjepan Radić, Tomislav Krznar, Marija Selak, Ksenija Matuš, Bruno Ćurko, Ivana Zagorac, Ivana Skuhala Karasman & Tina Marasović (2010). Filozofski Život. Filozofska Istrazivanja 29 (4):809-848.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Franc Marusˇicˇ & Rok Zˇaucer (2005). On Phonologically Null Verbs: GO and Beyond. In Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente & Erik Schoorlemmer (eds.), Proceedings of Console Xiii. 231--248.score: 1.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation