Search results for 'Merim Bilali' (try it on Scholar)

9 found
Sort by:
  1. Merim Bilali (2008). Expert and “Novice” Problem Solving Strategies in Chess: Sixty Years of Citing de Groot (1946). Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):395 – 408.score: 240.0
    In a famous study of expert problem solving, de Groot (1946/1978) examined how chess players found the best move. He reported that there was little difference in the way that the best players (Grand Masters) and very good players (Candidate Masters) searched the board. Although this result has been regularly cited in studies of expertise, it is frequently misquoted. It is often claimed that de Groot found no difference in the way that experts and novices investigate a problem. Comparison of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Fernand Gobet, Peter McLeod & Merim Bilalić (2011). Expert and “Novice” Problem Solving Strategies in Chess: Sixty Years of Citing de Groot (1946). Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):395-408.score: 3.0
    In a famous study of expert problem solving, de Groot (1946/1978) examined how chess players found the best move. He reported that there was little difference in the way that the best players (Grand Masters) and very good players (Candidate Masters) searched the board. Although this result has been regularly cited in studies of expertise, it is frequently misquoted. It is often claimed that de Groot found no difference in the way that experts and novices investigate a problem. Comparison of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Merim Bilalić, Peter McLeod & Fernand Gobet (2009). Specialization Effect and Its Influence on Memory and Problem Solving in Expert Chess Players. Cognitive Science 33 (6):1117-1143.score: 3.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Merim Bilalić & Peter Mcleod (2007). Participation Rates and the Difference in Performance of Women and Men in Chess. Journal of Biosocial Science 39 (5):789.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Johannes Rennig, Merim Bilalić, Elisabeth Huberle, Hans-Otto Karnath & Marc Himmelbach (2013). The Temporo-Parietal Junction Contributes to Global Gestalt Perception—Evidence From Studies in Chess Experts. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 3.0
  6. Merim Bilalic & Peter McLeod (2006). How Intellectual is Chess? -- A Reply to Howard. Journal of Biosocial Science 38 (3):419-421.score: 3.0
    Howard's (2005) claim that male dominance in chess is 'consistent with the evolutionary psychology view that males predominate at high achievement levels at least partly because of ability differences' (p. 378) is based on the premise that top level chess skill depends on a high level of IQ and visuospatial abilities. This premise is not supported by empirical evidence. In 1927 Djakow et al. first showed that world-class chess players do not have exceptional intellectual abilities. This finding has subsequently been (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Merim Bilalić & Fernand Gobet (2009). They Do What They Are Told to Do: The Influence of Instruction on (Chess) Expert Perception—Commentary on Linhares and Brum (2007). Cognitive Science 33 (5):743-747.score: 3.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Merim Bilalić, Peter McLeod & Fernand Gobet (2008). Why Good Thoughts Block Better Ones: The Mechanism of the Pernicious Einstellung (Set) Effect. Cognition 108 (3):652-661.score: 3.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Nemanja Vaci, Bartosz Gula & Merim Bilalić (2014). Restricting Range Restricts Conclusions. Frontiers in Psychology 5.score: 3.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation