4 found
Sort by:
  1. Susan Dorr Goold, Michael A. Neblo, Scott Y. H. Kim, Raymond de Vries, Gene Rowe & Peter Muhlberger (2012). What Is Good Public Deliberation? Hastings Center Report 42 (2):24-26.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Michael A. Neblo (2011). Deliberation's Legitimation Crisis: Reply to Gleason. Critical Review 23 (3):405-419.
    ABSTRACT Laurel Gleason contends that deliberative polling constrains the autonomy of participants and substitutes the ideas and agendas of ?experts? for those of the deliberators. However, the format and informational constraints faced by participants in deliberative forums are no worse, and are in many ways better, than those faced by ordinary citizens. The real problem with deliberative polls is that if they were to become popular, it would be tempting for interest groups and partisan elites to create polls in which (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Michael A. Neblo & Benjamin T. Jones (2007). Thomas C. Schelling, Strategies of Commitment and Other Essays:Strategies of Commitment and Other Essays. Ethics 118 (1):176-181.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. by Scott A. Anderson, Jeremy D. Bendik‐Keymer, Samuel Black, Chad M. Cyrenne, Bart Gruzalski, Mark P. Jenkins, John Morrow, Michael A. Neblo, Tommie Shelby & James Stacey Taylor (2002). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Ethics 112 (2):421-427.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation