5 found
Order:
  1.  8
    Michael A. Neblo (2011). Deliberation's Legitimation Crisis: Reply to Gleason. Critical Review 23 (3):405-419.
    ABSTRACT Laurel Gleason contends that deliberative polling constrains the autonomy of participants and substitutes the ideas and agendas of ?experts? for those of the deliberators. However, the format and informational constraints faced by participants in deliberative forums are no worse, and are in many ways better, than those faced by ordinary citizens. The real problem with deliberative polls is that if they were to become popular, it would be tempting for interest groups and partisan elites to create polls in which (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  5
    by Scott A. Anderson, Jeremy D. Bendik‐Keymer, Samuel Black, Chad M. Cyrenne, Bart Gruzalski, Mark P. Jenkins, John Morrow, Michael A. Neblo, Tommie Shelby & James Stacey Taylor (2002). Book Notes. [REVIEW] Ethics 112 (2):421-427.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  4
    Michael A. Neblo & Benjamin T. Jones (2007). Thomas C. Schelling, Strategies of Commitment and Other Essays:Strategies of Commitment and Other Essays. Ethics 118 (1):176-181.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Susan Dorr Goold, Michael A. Neblo, Scott Y. H. Kim, Raymond de Vries, Gene Rowe & Peter Muhlberger (2012). What Is Good Public Deliberation? Hastings Center Report 42 (2):24-26.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Michael A. Neblo (2015). Deliberative Democracy Between Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
    Deliberative democrats seek to link political choices more closely to the deliberations of common citizens, rather than consigning them to speak only in the desiccated language of checks on a ballot. Sober thinkers from Plato to today, however, have argued that if we want to make good decisions we cannot entrust them to the deliberations of common citizens. Critics argue that deliberative democracy is wildly unworkable in practice. Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice cuts across this debate by clarifying the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography