43 found
Sort by:
  1. Michael Baur (ed.) (forthcoming). Hegel: Key Concepts. Acumen.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Michael Baur (forthcoming). Lonergan and Hegel on Some Aspects of Knowing in Advance. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Michael Baur (ed.) (2014). G. W. F. Hegel: Key Concepts. Routledge.
    The thought of G. W. F. Hegel (1770 -1831) has had a deep and lasting influence on a wide range of philosophical, political, religious, aesthetic, cultural and scientific movements. But, despite the far-reaching importance of Hegel's thought, there is often a great deal of confusion about what he actually said or believed. G. W. F. Hegel: Key Concepts provides an accessible introduction to both Hegel's thought and Hegel-inspired philosophy in general, demonstrating how his concepts were understood, adopted and critically transformed (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Michael Baur (2011). Law and Natural Law. In Brian Davies & Eleonore Stump (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stephen Houlgate & Michael Baur (eds.) (2011). A Companion to Hegel. Blackwell Pub..
    With insights for students and specialists alike, "A Companion to Hegel" provides a valuable understanding of the work of a subtle and challenging philosopher ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Michael Baur (2010). The Language of Rights. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:89-98.
    Alasdair MacIntyre has argued that our contemporary discourse about “rights,” and “natural rights” or “human rights,” is alien to the thought of Aristotleand Aquinas. His worry, it seems, is that our contemporary language of rights is often taken to imply that individuals may possess certain entitlement-conferringproperties or powers (typically called “rights”) entirely in isolation from other individuals, and outside the context of any community or common good. In thispaper, I accept MacIntyre’s worries about our contemporary language of “rights”; however, I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Michael Baur (2005). What is Distinctive About Terrorism, and What Are the Philosophical Implications? In Timothy Shanahan (ed.), Philosophy 9/11: Thinking About the War on Terrorism. Open Court.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Michael Baur (2004). Minutes of the 2004 Executive Council Meeting. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:301-302.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Michael Baur (2004). Minutes of the 2004 Business Meeting. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:303-303.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Michael Baur (2004). Minutes of the Business Meeting Eighteenth Biennial Meeting of the Hegel Society of America. The Owl of Minerva 36 (1):75-76.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Michael Baur (2004). Secretary's Report (2003). Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:305-309.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Michael Baur (2003). Kant, Lonergan, and Fichte on the Critique of Immediacy and the Epistemology of Constraint in Human Knowing. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):91-112.
    One of the defining characteristics of Kant’s “critical philosophy” is what has been called the “critique of immediacy” or the rejection of the “myth of the given.” According to the Kantian position, no object can count as an object for a human knower apart from the knower’s own activity or spontaneity. That is, no object can count as an object for a human knower on the basis of the object’s givenness alone. But this gives rise to a problem: how is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Michael Baur (2003). Minutes of the 2003 Executive Council Meeting. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:303-304.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Michael Baur (2003). Newman on the Problem of the Partiality and Unity of the Sciences. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:111-127.
    This paper focuses on Newman’s approach to what we might call “the problem of the partiality and unity of the sciences.” The problem can be expressedin the form of a question: “If all human knowing is finite and partial, then on what grounds can one know of the unity and wholeness of all the sciences?” Newman’s solution to the problem is openly theistic, since it appeals to one’s knowledge of God. For Newman, even if I exclusively pursue my own partial (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Michael Baur (2003). Problems From Kant. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):124-126.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Michael Baur (2003). Hegel, Literature and the Problem of Agency (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (1):134-135.
  17. Michael Baur (2002). Hegel Society of America. The Owl of Minerva 34 (1):133-134.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Michael Baur (2002). Minutes of the 2002 Executive Council Meeting. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:287-289.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Michael Baur (2002). Reversing Rawls Criteriology, Contractualism and the Primacy of the Practical. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (3):251-296.
    In this paper, I offer an immanent critique of John Rawls’s theory of justice which seeks to show that Rawls’s understanding of his theory of justice as criteriological and contractarian is ultimately incompatible with his claim that the theory is grounded on the primacy of the practical. I agree with Michael Sandel’s observation that the Rawlsian theory of justice rests on substantive metaphysical and epistemological claims, in spite of Rawls’s assurances to the contrary. But while Sandel argues for even more (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Michael Baur (2002). Secretary's Report (2001). Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:291-296.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Michael Baur (2001). Minutes of the 2001 Executive Council Meeting. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:325-328.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Michael Baur (2001). Minutes of the Business Meeting. The Owl of Minerva 32 (2):231-232.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Michael Baur (2001). Person, Soul, and Immortality. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:329-333.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Michael Baur (2001). Secretary's Report (2000). Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:329-333.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Michael Baur (2000). Kant's “Moral Proof”. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 74:141-161.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Michael Baur (1998). Die Einleitung zu „Sein und Zeit" und die Frage nach der phänomenologischen Methode. Perspektiven der Philosophie 24:225-248.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Michael Baur (1998). Die Einleitung zu „Sein und Zeit. Perspektiven der Philosophie 24:225-248.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Michael Baur (1998). Sublating Kant and the Old Metaphysics. The Owl of Minerva 29 (2):139-164.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Michael Baur (1996). Adorno and Heidegger on Art in the Modern World. Philosophy Today 40 (3):357-366.
    First, this article considers some similarities between Adorno and Heidegger concerning the role of art in the modern world. Next, the article outlines some crucial differences; for example, Adorno regards all thought (including that which gives rise to art) as intrinsically dominative, while Heidegger holds that even dominative, objectifying thought presupposes a kind of thought that is not dominative or objectifying. An articulation of these differences helps to illuminate the ways in which the ideas of both Adorno and Heidegger are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Michael Baur (1996). Heidegger and Aquinas on the Self as Substance. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 70 (3):317-337.
  31. Michael Baur (1996). Klein, Ellen R. Feminism Under Fire. Review of Metaphysics 50 (1):164-165.
  32. Michael Baur (1995). Meeting of the North American Fichte Society. The Owl of Minerva 27 (1):115-115.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Michael Baur (1995). The Metaphysics of Being of St. Thomas in a Historical Perspective. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69 (1):101-103.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Michael Baur (1994). Hegel and Aquinas on Self-Knowledge and Historicity. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 68:125-134.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Michael Baur (1994). Recognition. Review of Metaphysics 47 (4):849-851.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Michael Baur (1994). The End of History and the Last Man. Review of Metaphysics 48 (1):135-137.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Michael Baur (1993). Hegel at the APA. The Owl of Minerva 24 (2):254-254.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Michael Baur (1993). Radical Realism. Review of Metaphysics 47 (2):379-380.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Michael Baur (1992). " Hegel and Heidegger as Transcendental Philosophers." Directed by Profs. Graeme A. Nicholson and Rebecca Comay. The Owl of Minerva 24 (1):125-128.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Michael Baur (1992). Kinds of Being. Review of Metaphysics 46 (1):166-168.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Michael Baur (1992). Phenomenological Interpretations with Respect to Aristotle: Indication of the Hermeneutical Situation by Martin Heidegger. [REVIEW] Man and World 25 (3-4):355-393.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Michael Baur (1991). Hegel and the Overcoming of the Understanding. The Owl of Minerva 22 (2):141-158.
  43. Michael Baur (1990). On the Aim of Scientific Theories in Relating to the World: A Defence of the Semantic Account. Dialogue 29 (03):323-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation