6 found
Order:
  1.  29
    Michael D. Root (1976). Speaker Intuitions. Philosophical Studies 29 (4):221 - 234.
    I compare the tasks that Noam Chomsky and W. V. Quine assign the grammarian and point out that in many cases where Chomsky sees a question of fact Quine sees only a question of convenience. I argue that these differences are attributable, at least in part, to a difference in view concerning the data. Chomsky relies mostly on a speaker's reports of his linguistic intuitions. Quine finds this source methodologically moot. I develop a series of arguments that draw on Quine's (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  18
    Michael D. Root (1977). Nelson Goodman and the Logical Articulation of Nominal Compounds. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (2):259-271.
    Nelson Goodman claims to have given us a criterion for likeness of meaning that is more stringent than simple coextensiveness and yet that avoids the familiar extentionalist objections. The notion of a nominal compound plays a key role in his account. I show that Goodman's comments concerning this notion are inadequate, that his comments concerning expressions like unicorn-picture are subject to two serious objections: they don't support his claims about likeness of meaning and they make English an unlearnable language.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  12
    Michael D. Root (1996). Book Review:The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Martin Hollis. [REVIEW] Ethics 107 (1):157-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  6
    Michael D. Root (1974). Quine's Methodological Reflections. Metaphilosophy 5 (1):36–50.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Michael D. Root (1971). How to Simulate an Innate Idea. Philosophical Forum 3 (1):12.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Michael D. Root (1970). The Implications of Recent Developments in Linguistics for the Doctrine of Innate Ideas. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography