21 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Michael Dunn [16]Michael C. Dunn [5]
  1.  20
    Michael Dunn, Mark Sheehan, Tony Hope & Michael Parker (2012). Toward Methodological Innovation in Empirical Ethics Research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (04):466-480.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  2.  20
    Jonathan Ives & Michael Dunn (2010). Who's Arguing? A Call for Reflexivity in Bioethics. Bioethics 24 (5):256-265.
    In this paper we set forth what we believe to be a relatively controversial argument, claiming that 'bioethics' needs to undergo a fundamental change in the way it is practised. This change, we argue, requires philosophical bioethicists to adopt reflexive practices when applying their analyses in public forums, acknowledging openly that bioethics is an embedded socio-cultural practice, shaped by the ever-changing intuitions of individual philosophers, which cannot be viewed as a detached intellectual endeavour. This said, we argue that in order (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  3.  11
    Mark Sheehan & Michael Dunn (2013). On the Nature and Sociology of Bioethics. Health Care Analysis 21 (1):54-69.
    Much has been written in the last decade about how we should understand the value of the sociology of bioethics. Increasingly the value of the sociology of bioethics is interpreted by its advocates directly in terms of its relationship to bioethics. It is claimed that the sociology of bioethics (and related disciplinary approaches) should be seen as an important component of work in bioethics. In this paper we wish to examine whether, and how, the sociology of bioethics can be defended (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4. Michael Dunn & Greg Restall (2002). Relevance Logic. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Kluwer
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  5.  8
    Leah M. McClimans, Michael Dunn & Anne‐Marie Slowther (2011). Health Policy, Patient‐Centred Care and Clinical Ethics. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):913-919.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  5
    Michael C. Dunn, Isabel C. H. Clare & Anthony J. Holland (2008). Substitute Decision-Making for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities Living in Residential Care: Learning Through Experience. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 16 (1):52-64.
    In the UK, current policies and services for people with mental disorders, including those with intellectual disabilities (ID), presume that these men and women can, do, and should, make decisions for themselves. The new Mental Capacity Act (England and Wales) 2005 (MCA) sets this presumption into statute, and codifies how decisions relating to health and welfare should be made for those adults judged unable to make one or more such decisions autonomously. The MCA uses a procedural checklist to guide this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  7.  20
    Michael Dunn & Jonathan Ives (2009). Methodology, Epistemology, and Empirical Bioethics Research: A Constructive/Ist Commentary. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):93-95.
  8.  12
    Chong Ming Lim, Michael C. Dunn & Jacqueline J. Chin (forthcoming). Clarifying the Best Interests Standard: The Elaborative and Enumerative Strategies in Public Policy-Making. Journal of Medical Ethics:medethics-2016-103454.
    One recurring criticism of the best interests standard concerns its vagueness, and thus the inadequate guidance it offers to care providers. The lack of an agreed definition of ‘best interests’, together with the fact that several suggested considerations adopted in legislation or professional guidelines for doctors do not obviously apply across different groups of persons, result in decisions being made in murky waters. In response, bioethicists have attempted to specify the best interests standard, to reduce the indeterminacy surrounding medical decisions. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  1
    Thomas M. Donaldson, Elizabeth Fistein & Michael Dunn (2010). Case-Based Seminars in Medical Ethics Education: How Medical Students Define and Discuss Moral Problems. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (12):816-820.
    Discussion of real cases encountered by medical students has been advocated as a component of medical ethics education. Suggested benefits include: a focus on the actual problems that medical students confront; active learner involvement; and facilitation of an exploration of the meaning of their own values in relation to professional behaviour. However, the approach may also carry risks: students may focus too narrowly on particular clinical topics or show a preference for discussing legal problems that may appear to have clearer (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10.  12
    Michael Dunn & Mark Sheehan (2010). No Sex Please, We're Social Scientists? American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):39-41.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  2
    Michael C. Dunn, Zeynep Gurtin-Broadbent, Jessica R. Wheeler & Jonathan Ives (2008). Jack of All Trades, Master of None? Challenges Facing Junior Academic Researchers in Bioethics. Clinical Ethics 3 (4):160-163.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  12
    Fiona M. Jordan & Michael Dunn (2010). Commentary/Jones: Human Kinship, From Conceptual Stru Kin Term Diversity is the Result of Multilevel, Historical Processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:5.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  40
    Mark Sheehan & Michael Dunn (2010). No Sex Please, We're Social Scientists? American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):39-41.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  3
    Jacob Moses, Nancy Berlinger, Michael C. Dunn, Michael K. Gusmano & Jacqueline J. Chin (2015). Bioethics Casebook 2.0: Using Web‐Based Design and Tools to Promote Ethical Reflection and Practice in Health Care. Hastings Center Report 45 (6):19-25.
    The idea of the Internet as Gutenberg 2.0—a true revolution in disseminating information—is now a routine part of how bioethics education works. The Internet has become indispensable as a channel for sharing teaching materials and connecting learners with a central platform that houses materials to support an online or hybrid curriculum or a traditional course. A newer idea in bioethics education reflects developments in web-based medical education more broadly and draws on design principles developed for the Internet. This approach to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  6
    Rachel Davies, Jonathan Ives & Michael Dunn (2015). A Systematic Review of Empirical Bioethics Methodologies. BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):15.
    Despite the increased prevalence of bioethics research that seeks to use empirical data to answer normative research questions, there is no consensus as to what an appropriate methodology for this would be. This review aims to search the literature, present and critically discuss published Empirical Bioethics methodologies.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  4
    Fiona M. Jordan & Michael Dunn (2010). Kin Term Diversity is the Result of Multilevel, Historical Processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):388.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  1
    Michael Dunn (2016). Contextualising Consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (2):67-68.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  3
    Michael Dunn & Leonard Lipshitz (1987). Meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic: Indianapolis. Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):883-887.
  19.  2
    Michael Dunn (2013). A Global Affair. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (10):601-602.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Michael Dunn & Leonard Lipshitz (1987). Meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic, Indianapolis, 1986. Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):883-887.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Michael C. Dunn, Isabel C. H. Clare & Anthony J. Holland (2008). Substitute Decision-Making for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities Living in Residential Care: Learning Through Experience. Health Care Analysis 16 (1):52-64.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography