46 found
Order:
  1.  2
    Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Christine Gunlogson & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2008). Addressees Distinguish Shared From Private Information When Interpreting Questions During Interactive Conversation. Cognition 107 (3):1122-1134.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  2.  9
    James S. Magnuson, Michael K. Tanenhaus, Richard N. Aslin & Delphine Dahan (2003). The Time Course of Spoken Word Learning and Recognition: Studies with Artificial Lexicons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (2):202.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  3.  4
    Daniel J. Grodner, Natalie M. Klein, Kathleen M. Carbary & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2010). Some,” and Possibly All, Scalar Inferences Are Not Delayed: Evidence for Immediate Pragmatic Enrichment”. Cognition 116 (1):42-55.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  4.  2
    Joy E. Hanna & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2004). Pragmatic Effects on Reference Resolution in a Collaborative Task: Evidence From Eye Movements. Cognitive Science 28 (1):105-115.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  5.  7
    Sarah C. Creel, Richard N. Aslin & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2008). Heeding the Voice of Experience: The Role of Talker Variation in Lexical Access. Cognition 106 (2):633-664.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  6.  3
    Sarah Brown‐Schmidt & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2008). Real‐Time Investigation of Referential Domains in Unscripted Conversation: A Targeted Language Game Approach. Cognitive Science 32 (4):643-684.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  7.  3
    Daphna Heller, Daniel Grodner & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2008). The Role of Perspective in Identifying Domains of Reference. Cognition 108 (3):831-836.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  8. Judith Degen & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2015). Processing Scalar Implicature: A Constraint‐Based Approach. Cognitive Science 39 (4):667-710.
    Three experiments investigated the processing of the implicature associated with some using a “gumball paradigm.” On each trial, participants saw an image of a gumball machine with an upper chamber with 13 gumballs and an empty lower chamber. Gumballs then dropped to the lower chamber and participants evaluated statements, such as “You got some of the gumballs.” Experiment 1 established that some is less natural for reference to small sets and unpartitioned sets compared to intermediate sets. Partitive some of was (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  9
    Thomas A. Farmer, Meredith Brown & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2013). Prediction, Explanation, and the Role of Generative Models in Language Processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):211-212.
    We propose, following Clark, that generative models also play a central role in the perception and interpretation of linguistic signals. The data explanation approach provides a rationale for the role of prediction in language processing and unifies a number of phenomena, including multiple-cue integration, adaptation effects, and cortical responses to violations of linguistic expectations.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10.  2
    James S. Magnuson, James A. Dixon, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin (2007). The Dynamics of Lexical Competition During Spoken Word Recognition. Cognitive Science 31 (1):133-156.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  11. Meghan Clayards, Michael K. Tanenhaus, Richard N. Aslin & Robert A. Jacobs (2008). Perception of Speech Reflects Optimal Use of Probabilistic Speech Cues. Cognition 108 (3):804-809.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  12.  5
    Bob McMurray, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin (2002). Gradient Effects of Within-Category Phonetic Variation on Lexical Access. Cognition 86 (2):B33-B42.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  13.  40
    Daphna Heller, Kristen S. Gorman & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2012). To Name or to Describe: Shared Knowledge Affects Referential Form. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2):290-305.
    The notion of common ground is important for the production of referring expressions: In order for a referring expression to be felicitous, it has to be based on shared information. But determining what information is shared and what information is privileged may require gathering information from multiple sources, and constantly coordinating and updating them, which might be computationally too intensive to affect the earliest moments of production. Previous work has found that speakers produce overinformative referring expressions, which include privileged names, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14.  5
    Jessica Maye, Richard N. Aslin & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2008). The Weckud Wetch of the Wast: Lexical Adaptation to a Novel Accent. Cognitive Science 32 (3):543-562.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  15.  4
    Susan Wagner Cook & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2009). Embodied Communication: Speakers' Gestures Affect Listeners' Actions. Cognition 113 (1):98-104.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  16.  2
    Whitney Tabor & Michael K. Tanenhaus (1999). Dynamical Models of Sentence Processing. Cognitive Science 23 (4):491-515.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  17.  11
    Michael K. Tanenhaus & Mary Hare (2007). Phonological Typicality and Sentence Processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (3):93-95.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  18.  3
    James S. Magnuson, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin (2008). Immediate Effects of Form-Class Constraints on Spoken Word Recognition. Cognition 108 (3):866-873.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  19.  5
    James S. Magnuson, Bob McMurray, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin (2003). Lexical Effects on Compensation for Coarticulation: The Ghost of Christmash Past. Cognitive Science 27 (2):285-298.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  20.  10
    Jeffrey T. Runner, Rachel S. Sussman & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2003). Assignment of Reference to Reflexives and Pronouns in Picture Noun Phrases: Evidence From Eye Movements. Cognition 89 (1):B1-B13.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  21.  11
    Duane G. Watson, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Christine A. Gunlogson (2008). Interpreting Pitch Accents in Online Comprehension: H* Vs. L+H. Cognitive Science 32 (7):1232-1244.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  22.  2
    Michael K. Tanenhaus & Margery M. Lucas (1987). Context Effects in Lexical Processing. Cognition 25 (1-2):213-234.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  23.  14
    Jennifer E. Arnold & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2011). Disfluency Effects in Comprehension: How New Information Can Become Accessible. In Edward Gibson & Neal J. Pearlmutter (eds.), The Processing and Acquisition of Reference. The MIT Press 197--217.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  2
    Duane G. Watson, Jennifer E. Arnold & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2008). Tic Tac TOE: Effects of Predictability and Importance on Acoustic Prominence in Language Production. Cognition 106 (3):1548-1557.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  7
    Jeffrey T. Runner, Rachel S. Sussman & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2006). Processing Reflexives and Pronouns in Picture Noun Phrase. Cognitive Science 30 (2):193-241.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26.  2
    James S. Magnuson, Bob McMurray, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin (2003). Lexical Effects on Compensation for Coarticulation: A Tale of Two Systems? Cognitive Science 27 (5):801-805.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  27.  20
    Michael K. Tanenhaus, Storto@Ling.Rochester.Edu; Mtan@Bcs.Rochester.Edu.
    We adopt the visual-world eye-tracking paradigm to test the hypothesis that scalar implicatures are integrated very locally to the utterance of scalar terms. Focusing on the and,or scale, we show that early point-of-disambiguation effects similar to those triggered by the integration of the lexical meaning of and can be triggered by the integration of the exhaustive meaning of or. Some design issues and an independent interpretive asymmetry holding between and and or are discussed as possible explanations for remaining differences between (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  7
    Judith Degen & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2016). Availability of Alternatives and the Processing of Scalar Implicatures: A Visual World Eye‐Tracking Study. Cognitive Science 40 (1):172-201.
    Two visual world experiments investigated the processing of the implicature associated with some using a “gumball paradigm.” On each trial, participants saw an image of a gumball machine with an upper chamber with orange and blue gumballs and an empty lower chamber. Gumballs dropped to the lower chamber, creating a contrast between a partitioned set of gumballs of one color and an unpartitioned set of the other. Participants then evaluated spoken statements, such as “You got some of the blue gumballs.” (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  8
    Duane G. Watson, Jennifer E. Arnold & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2010). Corrigendum to Tic Tac TOE: Effects of Predictability and Importance on Acoustic Prominence in Language Production. Cognition 114 (3):462-463.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  7
    Kathleen M. Carbary, Ellen E. Frohning & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2010). Context, Syntactic Priming, and Referential Form in an Interactive Dialogue Task: Implications for Models of Alignment. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society 109--114.
  31.  9
    Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2004). Priming and Alignment: Mechanism or Consequence? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):193-194.
    We agree with Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) proposal that dialogue is an important empirical and theoretical test bed for models of language processing. However, we offer two cautionary notes. First, the enterprise will require explicit computational models. Second, such models will need to incorporate both joint and separate speaker and hearer commitments in ways that go beyond priming and alignment.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. Jeffrey T. Runner, Rachel S. Sussman & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2006). Assigning Referents to Reflexives and Pronouns in Picture Noun Phrases: Experimental Tests of Binding Theory. Cognitive Science 30:1-49.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33. Michael K. Tanenhaus (2009). Spoken Language Comprehension: Insights From Eye Movements. In Gareth Gaskell (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  7
    Anne Pier Salverda, Delphine Dahan, Michael K. Tanenhaus, Katherine Crosswhite, Mikhail Masharov & Joyce McDonough (2007). Effects of Prosodically Modulated Sub-Phonetic Variation on Lexical Competition. Cognition 105 (2):466-476.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  16
    Michael K. Tanenhaus, Are Scalar Implicatures Computed Online?
    Since Horn (1972) the notion of conversational implicature proposed by Grice has been put to use to explain certain interpretive differences between expressions in natural language and their counterparts in formal logic. For example, the sentences in (1) seem to convey more than they would be expected to if the natural language disjunction or had the same meaning as the logical disjunction ∨, or if the quantificational determiner some was interpreted as the existential quantifier ∃.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  1
    Christina S. Kim, Christine Gunlogson, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Jeffrey T. Runner (2015). Context-Driven Expectations About Focus Alternatives. Cognition 139:28-49.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  5
    Natalie M. Klein, Whitney M. Gegg-Harrison, Greg N. Carlson & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2013). Experimental Investigations of Weak Definite and Weak Indefinite Noun Phrases. Cognition 128 (2):187-213.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  2
    Michael K. Tanenhaus (2003). Sentence Processing. In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  7
    Michael K. Tanenhaus, James S. Magnuson, Bob McMurray & Richard N. Aslin (2000). No Compelling Evidence Against Feedback in Spoken Word Recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):348-349.
    Norris et al.'s claim that feedback is unnecessary is compromised by (1) a questionable application of Occam's razor, given strong evidence for feedback in perception; (2) an idealization of the speech recognition problem that simplifies those aspects of the input that create conditions where feedback is useful; (3) Norris et al.'s use of decision nodes that incorporate feedback to model some important empirical results; and (4) problematic linking hypotheses between crucial simulations and behavioral data.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  2
    Chigusa Kurumada, Meredith Brown, Sarah Bibyk, Daniel F. Pontillo & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2014). Is It or Isn’T It: Listeners Make Rapid Use of Prosody to Infer Speaker Meanings. Cognition 133 (2):335-342.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Donna K. Byron, Sarah BrownSchmidt & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2008). The Overlapping Distri Bution of Personal and Demonstrative Pronouns. In Jeanette K. Gundel & Nancy Ann Hedberg (eds.), Reference: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Oxford University Press 143--175.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Qingrong Chen, Jingjing Zhang, Xiaodong Xu, Christoph Scheepers, Yiming Yang & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2016). Prosodic Expectations in Silent Reading: ERP Evidence From Rhyme Scheme and Semantic Congruence in Classic Chinese Poems. Cognition 154:11-21.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Elsi Kaiser, Jeffrey T. Runner, Rachel S. Sussman & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2009). Structural and Semantic Constraints on the Resolution of Pronouns and Reflexives. Cognition 112 (1):55-80.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Laura B. Silverman, Loisa Bennetto, Ellen Campana & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2010). Speech-and-Gesture Integration in High Functioning Autism. Cognition 115 (3):380-393.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton & Michael K. Tanenhaus (1996). Integrating Discourse and Local Constraints in Resolving Lexical Thematic Ambiguities. In Garrison W. Cottrell (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum 18--266.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Michael K. Tanenhaus (1984). Lexical Meanings, Structural Meanings, and Concepts Greg Carlson Wayne State University And. In David Testen, Veena Mishra & Joseph Drogo (eds.), Papers From the Parasession on Lexical Semantics. Chicago Linguistic Society 20--39.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography