4 found
  1.  2
    Erica von Essen & Michael P. Allen (2016). A Rabble in the Zoopolis? Considering Responsibilities for Wildlife Hybrids. Journal of Social Philosophy 47 (2):171-187.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  2.  1
    Erica von Essen & Michael P. Allen (2016). The Republican Zoopolis: Towards A New Legitimation Framework for Relational Animal Ethics. Ethics and the Environment 21 (1):61-88.
    An alternative to the negative rights slant in animal rights, focusing on abolition and hands-off approaches, has now surfaced within critical animal studies. Indeed, Relational Animal Rights Theory lays a foundation for positive relations of care, mutuality and dependence between species. In so doing, the theory is sensitive to the multitude of ways in which human and non-human animals interact across shared territories. Perhaps the most fruitful development with RART is offered by Donaldson and Kymlicka, insofar as it extends a (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  3.  61
    Michael P. Allen (2006). Hegel Between Non-Domination and Expressive Freedom: Capabilities, Perspectives, Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (4):493-512.
    Hegel may be read as endorsing a republican conception of freedom as non-domination. This may then be allied to an expressive conception of freedom not as communal integration and non-alienation, but rather as the development of new powers and capabilities. To this extent, he may be understood as occupying a position between nondomination and expressive freedom. This not only informs contemporary discussions of republicanism and democracy, but also suggests a ‘capabilities solution’ to the otherwise intractable problem of the rabble. Key (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  2
    Erica von Essen & Michael P. Allen (forthcoming). Reconsidering Illegal Hunting as a Crime of Dissent: Implication for Justice and Deliberative Uptake. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-16.
    In this paper, we determine whether illegal hunting should be construed as a crime of dissent. Using the Nordic countries as a case study where protest-driven, illegal hunting of protected wolves is on the rise, we reconsider the crime using principles of civil disobedience. We invoke the conditions of intentionality, nonevasion, dialogic effort, non-violence and appeal to parameters of reasonable disagreement about justice and situate the Nordic illegal hunting phenomenon at a nexus between conscientious objection, assisted disobedience and everyday resistance. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography