18 found
Order:
  1. Selmer Bringsjord & Michael John Zenzen (2003). Superminds People Harness Hypercomputation, and More. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  2.  84
    Ron Sun, Andrew Coward & Michael J. Zenzen (2005). On Levels of Cognitive Modeling. Philosophical Psychology 18 (5):613-637.
    The article first addresses the importance of cognitive modeling, in terms of its value to cognitive science (as well as other social and behavioral sciences). In particular, it emphasizes the use of cognitive architectures in this undertaking. Based on this approach, the article addresses, in detail, the idea of a multi-level approach that ranges from social to neural levels. In physical sciences, a rigorous set of theories is a hierarchy of descriptions/explanations, in which causal relationships among entities at a high (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  3.  18
    Michael J. Zenzen (1985). Entropy in Relation to Incomplete Knowledge. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  4.  36
    Selmer Bringsjord & Michael Zenzen (2002). Toward a Formal Philosophy of Hypercomputation. Minds and Machines 12 (2):241-258.
    Does what guides a pastry chef stand on par, from the standpoint of contemporary computer science, with what guides a supercomputer? Did Betty Crocker, when telling us how to bake a cake, provide an effective procedure, in the sense of `effective' used in computer science? According to Cleland, the answer in both cases is ``Yes''. One consequence of Cleland's affirmative answer is supposed to be that hypercomputation is, to use her phrase, ``theoretically viable''. Unfortunately, though we applaud Cleland's ``gadfly philosophizing'' (...)
    Direct download (17 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  13
    Ron Sun, L. Andrew Coward & Michael J. Zenzen (2005). On Levels of Cognitive Modeling. Philosophical Psychology 18 (5):613-637.
  6.  7
    Michael J. Zenzen & Kurt Marko (1990). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 39 (1):37-51.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  36
    Michael J. Zenzen (1977). The Suggestive Power of Color. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (2):185-190.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Henry B. Hollinger & Michael J. Zenzen (1987). The Nature of Irreversibility. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (3):404-406.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  10
    Michael J. Zenzen & Louis Z. Hammer (1978). Value Measurement and Existential Wholeness: A Critique of the Rokeachean Approach to Value Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 12 (2):142-156.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  11
    Michael J. Zenzen (1977). Popper, Grünbaum and de Facto Irreversibility. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (4):313-324.
  11.  14
    James Fahey & Michael Zenzen (1999). Reductionism and the Neuron Doctrine: A Metaphysical Fix of Gold & Stoljar's Trivial–Radical Distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):835-836.
    The trivial neuron doctrine (TND) holds that psychology merely depends on neurobiology. The radical neuron doctrine (RND) goes further and claims that psychology is superfluous in that neuroscience can “replace it.” Popular among RND notions of “replacement” is “reduction,” and in our commentary we challenge Gold & Stoljar (G&S) to make clear their distinction between merely depends on (TND) and is reducible to (RND). G&S give us a TND–RND distinction that is a distinction without a difference; a defensible TND–RND distinction (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  11
    Henry B. Hollinger & Michael J. Zenzen (1982). An Interpretation of Macroscopic Irreversibility Within the Newtonian Framework. Philosophy of Science 49 (3):309-354.
    Some of the most imaginative analyses in contemporary science have been fostered by the paradox of irreversibility. Rendered as a question the paradox reads: How can the anisotropic macrophysical behavior of a system of molecules be reconciled with the underlying reversible molecular model? Attempts to resolve and dissolve the paradox have appealed to large numbers of particles, jammed correlations, unseen perturbations, hidden variables or constraints, uncertainty principles, averaging procedures (e.g., coarse graining and time smoothing), stochastic flaws, cosmological origins, etc. While (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  10
    Michael J. Zenzen (1986). Book Review:Entropy in Relation to Incomplete Knowledge K. G. Denbigh, J. S. Denbigh. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 53 (3):451-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  10
    Michael J. Zenzen, John W. Murphy, Michael Henry, Christine Sypnowich & Kurt Marko (1989). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 37 (1):37-51.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  9
    James G. Colbert, Fred Seddon, Julien S. Murphy, John-Christian Smith, John W. Murphy, Michael J. Zenzen & Robert B. Louden (1992). Reviews. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 43 (1):37-71.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  1
    Michael J. Zenzen (1978). Thinking About Technology: A Meta-Inquiry. [REVIEW] Man and World 11 (3-4):336-349.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Walda Katz Fishman, George C. Benello, C. George Benello, Joseph Fashing, David G. Gil, Ted Goertzel, James Kelly, Alfred McClung Lee, Robert Newby, David J. O'Brien, Victoria Rader, Sal Restivo, Jerold M. Starr, Richard S. Sterne & Michael Zenzen (1986). Readings in Humanist Sociology: Social Criticism and Social Change. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Humanist sociologists are activists rooted in the reality of history and change and guided by a concern for the 'real life' problems of equality, peace, and social justice. They view people as active shapers of social life, capable of creating societies in which everyone's potential can unfold. Alfred McClung Lee introduces this volume with 'Sociology: Humanist and Scientific' and develops the theme that a sociology that is humanist is also scientific. The other nine selections are grouped into four parts: 'The (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Michael Zenzen (1987). Book Review:Philosophy, Its History and Historiography A. J. Holland. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 54 (2):317-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography