18 found
Sort by:
  1. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2013). Zarys naturalistycznej koncepcji intencjonalności. Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 22 (2):389-400.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Mieszko Tałasiewicz, Joanna Odrowąż-Sypniewska, Wojciech Wciórka & Piotr Wilkin (2013). Do We Need a New Theory of Truthmaking? Some Comments on Disjunction Thesis, Conjunction Thesis, Entailment Principle and Explanation. Philosophical Studies 165 (2):591-604.
    In the paper we discuss criticisms against David Armstrong’s general theory of truthmaking by Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra, Peter Schulte and Benjamin Schnieder, and conclude that Armstrong’s theory survives these criticisms. Special attention is given to the problems concerning Entailment Principle, Conjunction Thesis, Disjunction Thesis and to the notion of explanation.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2012). A New Perspective for the Theory of Intentionality. In Piotr Stalmaszcyzk (ed.), Philosophical and Formal Approaches to Linguistic Analysis. Ontos Verlag.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2012). Podmiot i predykat: fi lozofi czne podstawy gramatyki kategorialnej. Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 21 (1):147-165.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2012). The Core of Grammar. Semiotica 2012 (188).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2010). Wyobrażenia w nauce iw teologii. Studia Philosophiae Christianae 1:65-71.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2009). Nauka i teologia: konflikt wyobrażeń [polemika]. Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 44.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2009). Nazwy własne a użycie imienne. Filozofia Nauki 2.
    The editor rounds up the discussion between Tadeusz Ciecierski and Leopold Hess by pointing out that their conclusions are not as opposed as they are trying to show. On the contrary, on some interpretation one may even suggest that both views can convergently approach to some picture of the semantics of proper names. Roughly, the interpretation is that historical form of the debate about proper names has some drawbacks (as Hess points out) that could be mended if shifted to the (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2007). Kilka komentarzy do uwag Wiesława Walentukiewicza. Ruch Filozoficzny 4 (4).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2005). Twórcze aspekty analizy semantyczno-kategorialnej. Ruch Filozoficzny 2 (2).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2004). Własność i znaczenie. Studia Semiotyczne 25:165-185.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2003). Rodzaje niejednoznaczności opisu składniowego wyrażeń. Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 48 (4):145-154.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (ed.) (2002). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science at Warsaw University: Studies and Contributions to the 11th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Kraków (Cracow) August 20-26, 1999. [REVIEW] Wydawn. Nauk. Semper.
  14. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2002). Pragmatyczna koncepcja nieostrości. Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 41 (1):101-113.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2001). Analiza semantyczno-kategorialna. Badanie gramatyczności, czy ustalanie sensu. Filozofia Nauki 1.
    In the paper the author tries to show that semantico-categorial analysis in the traditional Ajdukiewiczian application as a tool of evaluating semantic completeness of complex expressions is ineffective. There is, however, another application, to which the analysis is much better fitted. Namely, it allows to precisify the actual uses of natural language - in all those cases in which on the one hand precision is a superior value, and on the other hand, the formalisation is not possible and one has (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (2000). Komprehencyjna koncepcja racjonalności nauki. Filozofia Nauki 2.
    The starting point of my considerations is the idea that the criteria of rationality should be distinguished from the essence of rationality (in linguistic formulation: from a non-criterional connotative definition) and that the question of the universality of rationality arises separately for the criteria and for the essence. I notice that a similar distinction between the essence (or a definition) and the criteria applies to the notion of truth. The thesis which constitutes ny standpoint is a compromising one: the criteria (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (1997). Można w coś wierzyć! (polemika z książką Bogdana Chwedeńczuka, „Trzeba w coś wierzyć?”). Etyka 30.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Mieszko Tałasiewicz (1995). O pojęciu „racjonalności” (II). Filozofia Nauki 3.
    The paper is divided into two parts. Part one (published in Filozofia Nauki, no 1-2/1995) contains revies of main types of rationality that can be found in literature, and an attempt to point out various relations among these types. Part two is devoted to analysis of some issues concerning detailed problems of rationality (e.g.: How to define rationality? Is rationality decidable? Does it come in degrees?).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation