14 found
Sort by:
  1. Pamela Sankar, Mildred K. Cho, Keri Monahan & Kamila Nowak (forthcoming). Reporting Race and Ethnicity in Genetics Research: Do Journal Recommendations or Resources Matter? Science and Engineering Ethics:1-14.
    Appeals to scrutinize the use of race and ethnicity as variables in genetics research notwithstanding, these variables continue to be inadequately explained and inconsistently used in research publications. In previous research, we found that published genetic research fails to follow suggestions offered for addressing this problem, such as explaining the basis on which these labels are assigned to populations. This study, an analysis of genetic research articles using race or ethnicity terms, explores possible features of journals that are associated with (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Mildred K. Cho (2014). Ethics and Empiricism in the Formation of Professional Guidelines. American Journal of Bioethics 14 (3):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mildred K. Cho (2014). Open-Label Extension Studies: Are They Really Research? American Journal of Bioethics 14 (3):1-2.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Mildred K. Cho (2008). Understanding Incidental Findings in the Context of Genetics and Genomics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):280-285.
    Human genetic and genomic research can yield information that may be of clinical relevance to the individuals who participate as subjects of the research. It has been common practice among researchers to notify participants during the informed consent process that no individual results will be disclosed, “incidental” or otherwise. However, as genetic information obtained in research becomes orders of magnitude more voluminous, increasingly accessible online, and more informative, this precedent may no longer be appropriate. There is not yet consensus on (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus (2008). Strangers at the Benchside: Research Ethics Consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4 – 13.
    Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Susan M. Wolf, Frances P. Lawrenz, Charles A. Nelson, Jeffrey P. Kahn, Mildred K. Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G. Fletcher, Michael K. Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson, Judy Illes, Vivek Kapur, Moira A. Keane, Barbara A. Koenig, Bonnie S. LeRoy, Elizabeth G. McFarland, Jordan Paradise, Lisa S. Parker, Sharon F. Terry, Brian van Ness & Benjamin S. Wilfond (2008). Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):219-248.
    No consensus yet exists on how to handle incidental fnd-ings in human subjects research. Yet empirical studies document IFs in a wide range of research studies, where IFs are fndings beyond the aims of the study that are of potential health or reproductive importance to the individual research participant. This paper reports recommendations of a two-year project group funded by NIH to study how to manage IFs in genetic and genomic research, as well as imaging research. We conclude that researchers (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle & Debra M. Satz (2007). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Thinking About the Human Neuron Mouse". American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):W4 – W6.
  8. Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle & Debra M. Satz (2007). Thinking About the Human Neuron Mouse. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):27 – 40.
  9. Mildred K. Cho (2006). Racial and Ethnic Categories in Biomedical Research: There is No Baby in the Bathwater. Journal of Law, Medicine Ethics 34 (3):497-499.
    The use of racial categories in biomedicine has had a long history in the United States. However, social hierarchy and discrimination, justified by purported scientific differences, has also plagued the history of racial categories. Because “race” has some correlation with biological and genetic characteristics, there has been a call not to “throw the baby out with the bathwater” by eliminating race as a research or clinical category. I argue that race is too undefined and fluid to be useful as a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. David Magnus & Mildred K. Cho (2006). A Commentary on Oocyte Donation for Stem Cell Research in South Korea. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):W23-W24.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Michelle R. Henry, Mildred K. Cho, Meredith A. Weaver & Jon F. Merz (2003). A Pilot Survey on the Licensing of DNA Inventions. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (3):442-449.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Arthur L. Caplan, Thomas A. Cavanaugh, Mildred K. Cho, Steve Heilig, John Hubert, Kenneth V. Iserson, Tom Koch & Mark G. Kuczewski (1998). David Buehler, M. Div., MA, is Founder of Bioethika Online Publishers and Also Serves as Chaplain to the University Lutheran Ministry of Providence, Rhode Island. Michael M. Burgess, Ph. D., is Chair in Biomedical Ethics, Centre for Applied Ethics at The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7:335-336.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jon F. Merz & Mildred K. Cho (1998). Disease Genes Are Not Patentable: A Rebuttal of McGee. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):425-428.
    Dr. McGee presents a cogent argument for the patentability of the diagnosis of gene forms that are found to be associated with disease or other phenotypic manifestations. We're convinced he's wrong. An analogy will help explain why.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Mildred K. Cho (1993). Are Clinical Trials of Cell Transplantation for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Ethical? Irb 16 (1-2):12-15.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation