12 found
Sort by:
  1. Miroslav Hanke (2014). The Analysis of Deductive Validity in Martin Le Maistre's Tractatus Consequentiarum. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1):29-46.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Miroslav Hanke (2014). The Bricot–Mair Dispute: Scholastic Prolegomena to Non-Compositional Semantics. History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (2):148-166.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Miroslav Hanke (2013). Implied-Meaning Analysis of the Currian Conditional. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (4):367 - 380.
    Expanding on the recent research of Stephen Read and Catarina Dutilh Novaes concerning Thomas Bradwardine's theory of truth, the present paper makes an effort to analyse the Currian conditional in terms of the so-called ?Bradwardine principle?, i.e. the principle that meaning is closed under entailment. Based upon two possible applications of this approach, alternative solutions to the issues of semantic pathology and trivialisation of deductive systems are presented.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Miroslav Hanke (2013). Insolubilia Novissima. Studia Neoaristotelica 10 (2):215-246.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Miroslav Hanke (2012). John Mair on Semantic Paradoxes. Studia Neoaristotelica 9 (2):154-183.
    John Mair (1467–1550) was an influential post-medieval scholar. This paper focuses on his Tractatus insolubilium, in which he proposed semantic analysis of self-referential phenomena, in particular on his solution to alethic and correspondence paradoxes and his treatment of their general semantic aspects as well as particular applications. His solution to paradoxes is based on the so-called “network evaluation”, i.e. on a semantics which defines the concepts of truth and correspondence with reality in contextual terms. Consequently, the relation between semantic valuation, (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Miroslav Hanke (2012). Opusculum insolubilium v kontextu scholastické logiky Analýza traktátu a pracovní edice. Studia Neoaristotelica 9 (3):63-92.
    Opusculum insolubilium is an anonymous sixteenth-century British logical treatise dealing with the so-called “insolubles”, i.e. self-reflexive paradoxical propositions. It summarises the fundamental principles of the approach proposed by Roger Swyneshed in the fourteenth century, which became popular in the British academic circles during the fifteenth century. The present paper has two basic aims: to contrive a modern edition of this treatise which could be used fora further research in post-mediaeval scholastic logic, and to provide elementary information about its content and (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Miroslav Hanke (2011). „Debeo tibi equum“ Analýza slibů v terministické sémantice čtrnáctého století. Studia Neoaristotelica 8 (2):189-210.
    The construction of mediaeval semantic theories is based on defining semantic concepts introduced by means of paradigmatic examples. One of the commonly discussed expressions is the promise “Debeo tibi equum”. This study deals with analyses of this proposition in fourteenth century logic done by means of instruments of terminist semantics. We may distinguish between realist and nominalist analyses, the nominalist may further be classified according to how the propositional context is interpreted – whether as extensional, intensional or hyperintensional. If we (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Miroslav Hanke (2011). Paradoxy, Pravdivost a Korespondence V Sémantice Rogera Swynesheda. Organon F 18 (1):40-61.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Miroslav Hanke (2010). The Simple Paradoxes of Validity and Bradwardinian-Buridanian Semantics. Studia Neoaristotelica 7 (2):116-160.
    This paper deals with the simple paradoxes of validity and with the possibility of solving them in terms of Bradwardinian-Buridanian semantics. The paradoxes of validity as conceived here are cases of semantic pathology, which result due to the use of terms signifying the validity of inference. Semantic paradoxes are a semantico-epistemological phenomenon which is a symptom of the need to revise several apparently acceptable semantic assumptions. The analysis of possible solutions to the paradoxes focuses on Bradwardinian-Buridanian semantics and as a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Miroslav Hanke (2009). John Buridan's Propositional Semantics. Studia Neoaristotelica 6 (2):183-208.
    Joannis Buridani de semantice propositionum doctrinaDissertatio proposita Joannis Buridani de semantice propositionum sententiam, quae in suis operibus logicis continetur, pertractat. Quaestio de semantice propositionali duplici modo sumi potest: scil. vel pure semantice (quarendo definitionem veritatis) vel ontologice (inquirendo de statu ontologico “complexesignificabilium”). In utraque quaestione solvenda Buridanus doctrinam semanticam quae “terminismus” dicitur assumit. Notionem veritatis Buridanus non ex significatione sed ex suppositione explicat, quo pacto possibile redditur, veritatem inductive per valorem semanticum propositionis partium definiri. Quaestionem alteram circa semanticen complexionis “accusativi (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Miroslav Hanke (2008). Cassantes v historické a systematické reflexi. Studia Neoaristotelica 5 (2):132-164.
    Doctrinae Cassantium analysis historica et systematicaDissertatio haec circa modum quendam solvendi paradoxorum semanticorum seu “insolubilium”, ut scholastici aiunt, versatur, quem doctores mediaevales, qui “Cassantes” dici solebant, proposuerunt. Secundum Cassantium sententiam, in cuius analysi perficienda huius tractationis scopus principaliter consistit, propositiones insolubiles “nihil dicunt”; sunt enim incongruae seu male formatae, et consequenter nec veritatis nec falsitatis capabiles. Cassantes igitur solvunt insolubilia abnegando iis capacitatem veritatis ac falsitatis, quam mere apparentem esse existimant. Praesuppositum fundamentale huiusmodi doctrinae est distinctio inter logicam et grammaticam (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Miroslav Hanke (2007). Perspektivy logické sémantiky Jana Buridana. Studia Neoaristotelica 4 (2):111-142.
    Semantica logicalis Ioannis Buridani eiusque explicatio necnon censuraHuius dissertationis scopus est analysis terminologiae logico-semanticae, quae Iohannes Buridanus (c. 1295–1360), logicus mediaevalis ad scholam Nominalium spectans, utitur. Inquisitio haec praecipue circa conceptus „causae veritatis“ et „consequentiae“ versatur, ad quos conceptus autem clarificandosduo apparent praerequisita: primo quidem explicatio significationis terminorum modalium (ut quid sit neessitas, quid possibilitas), secundo solutio (saltem attemptata) „insolubilium“ seu (ut moderni aiunt) paradoxorum semanticorum, ut paradoxi Epimenidis. Ex analysi Buridani discursus patet, eius intellegentiam logicae de facto parum successisse, (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation