48 found
Order:
  1. Mogens Lærke (2011). Spinoza's Cosmological Argument in the Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):439-462.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2. Mogens Lærke (2011). Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58-84.
    In this article, I discuss Leibniz's interpretation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. In particular, I consider whether Leibniz's position on this point was developed partly in reference to Spinoza's position. First, I analyze Leibniz's annotations from 1676 on Spinoza's Letter 12. The traditional cosmological argument, as found in Avicenna and Saint Thomas for example, relies on the Aristotelian assumption that an actual infinite is impossible and on the idea that there can be no effect without a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  18
    Mogens Lærke (2014). Spinoza's Language. Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):519-547.
    when reading spinoza’s Ethics,1 one comes upon a particularly disconcerting passage in Part Three. In an explication of two definitions of ‘favor’ (favor) and ‘indignation’ (indignatio), Spinoza writes,I know that in their common usage these words mean something else. But my purpose is to explain the nature of things, not the meaning of words. I intend to indicate these things by words whose meaning is not entirely opposed to the meaning with which I wish to use them. One warning of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  9
    Mogens Lærke (2013). Anima Mundi: The Rise of the World Soul Theory in Modern German Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (1):131-132.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  21
    Mogens Lærke (2007). Quod Non Omnia Possibilia Ad Existentiam Perveniant: Leibniz's Ontology of Possibility, 1668-1678. The Leibniz Review:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  4
    Mogens Lærke (2015). Leibniz on the Principle of Equipollence and Spinoza’s Causal Axiom. Leibniz Society Review 25:123-130.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  16
    Mogens Lærke (2015). Five Figures of Folding: Deleuze on Leibniz's Monadological Metaphysics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6):1192-1213.
    This article is about Gilles Deleuze's book Le Pli. Leibniz et le Baroque from 1988. It shows how Deleuze's notion of folding captures some basic intuitions in Leibniz and how they relate to each other. To this purpose, I propose five figures, all referring to the same basic fold, all illustrating how the consideration of such figures allows developing central elements of Leibniz's monadology. These figures can help, I hope, alleviate some of the fundamental difficulties in understanding Deleuze's approach to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  4
    Mogens Lærke (2009). Immanence et extériorité absolue. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 2 (2):169-190.
    Cet article explore la conception spinozienne du rapport entre substance et mode en analysant les notions de cause de soi, de cause immanente et de puissance. Nous soutenons que la théorie spinozienne de la causalité constitue une tentative pour développer une ontologie relationnelle de la puissance dans laquelle toute dénomination intrinsèque est fondée sur une dénomination extrinsèque. Par opposition à une interprétation courante selon laquelle la substance de Spinoza est une sorte de grande monade dans laquelle toutes choses inhèrent comme (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  15
    Mogens Lærke (2007). Quod Non Omnia Possibilia Ad Existentiam Perveniant. The Leibniz Review 17:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Mogens Lærke (2010). Four Things Deleuze Learned From Leibniz. In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave Macmillan
  11.  11
    Mogens Lærke (2011). A Conjecture About a Textual Mystery: Leibniz, Tschirnhaus and Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling. The Leibniz Review 21:33-68.
    In this article, I propose a conjecture concerning the transmission of Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling in the 1670s involving Leibniz. On the basis of a report about Spinoza’s philosophy written down by Leibniz after some conversations with Tschirnhaus in early 1676, I suggest that Tschirnhaus may have had in his possession a manuscript copy of KV and that his account of Spinoza’s doctrine to Leibniz was colored by this text. I support the hypothesis partly by means of external evidence, but mainly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  2
    Mogens Lærke (2015). La vie selon la raison. Physiologie et métaphysique chez Spinoza et Leibniz. Leibniz Society Review 25:99-104.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  15
    Mogens Lærke (2012). Toland et Leibniz. L’Invention du néo-spinozisme. The Leibniz Review 21:165-170.
  14.  22
    Mogens Lærke (2012). Paul Rateau (Ed.), L'Idée de Théodicée de Leibniz À Kant: Héritage, Transformations, Critiques. The Leibniz Review 22:157-159.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  7
    Mogens Lærke (2012). A Conjecture About a Textual Mystery. The Leibniz Review 21:33-68.
    In this article, I propose a conjecture concerning the transmission of Spinoza’s Korte Verhandeling in the 1670s involving Leibniz. On the basis of a report about Spinoza’s philosophy written down by Leibniz after some conversations with Tschirnhaus in early 1676, I suggest that Tschirnhaus may have had in his possession a manuscript copy of KV and that his account of Spinoza’s doctrine to Leibniz was colored by this text. I support the hypothesis partly by means of external evidence, but mainly (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  29
    Mogens Lærke (2008). Possibility, Agency and Individuality in Leibniz's Metaphysics. Dialogue 47 (2):395-397.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  5
    Mogens Lærke (2015). Five Figures of Folding: Deleuze on Leibniz's Monadological Metaphysics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6):1192-1213.
    This article is about Gilles Deleuze's book Le Pli. Leibniz et le Baroque from 1988. It shows how Deleuze's notion of folding captures some basic intuitions in Leibniz and how they relate to each other. To this purpose, I propose five figures, all referring to the same basic fold, all illustrating how the consideration of such figures allows developing central elements of Leibniz's monadology. These figures can help, I hope, alleviate some of the fundamental difficulties in understanding Deleuze's approach to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  24
    Mogens Lærke (2013). Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):57 - 77.
    (2013). Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 57-77. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2012.696052.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  17
    Mogens Lærke (2012). Martine de Gaudemar and Philippe Hamou (Eds.), Locke Et Leibniz. Deux Styles de Rationalité. The Leibniz Review 22:153-155.
  20.  21
    Mogens Lærke (2012). The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza's Ethica. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):843 - 847.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 20, Issue 4, Page 843-847, July 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  25
    Mogens Lærke (2011). Spinoza: une lecture d'Aristote. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):570 - 573.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 3, Page 570-573, May 2011.
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  9
    Mogens Lærke (2009). La Question du Mal Chez Leibniz. The Leibniz Review 19:77-91.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  13
    Mogens Lærke (2008). Response to Ohad Nachtomy on Possibilia in Leibniz, 1672-1676. The Leibniz Review 18:259-266.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  16
    Mogens Lærke (2012). The Continuum Companion to Spinoza. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):420-425.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 20, Issue 2, Page 420-425, March 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  14
    Mogens Lærke (2008). Leibniz selon les Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain. Dialogue 47 (3/4):690-694.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  2
    Mogens Lærke (2014). Leibniz, the Encyclopedia, and the Natural Order of Thinking. Journal of the History of Ideas 75 (2):237-259.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  10
    Mogens Lærke (2012). A Book Forged in Hell. Spinoza's Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):1037-1039.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 0, Issue 0, Page 1-3, Ahead of Print.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  15
    Mogens Lærke (2009). The Problem of Alloglossia . Leibniz on Spinoza's Innovative Use of Philosophical Language. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (5):939 – 953.
  29.  12
    Mogens Lærke (2008). Leibniz selon les Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain François Duchesneau et Jérémie Griard Collection «Analytiques» Paris/Montréal, Vrin/Bellarmin, 2006, 352 p. [REVIEW] Dialogue 47 (3-4):690-.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  8
    Mogens Lærke (2012). Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad By Daniel Garber Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Pp. 428 + Xxi. Philosophy 87 (03):449-452.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  8
    Mogens Lærke (2011). The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's 'Ethics'. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (1):149-153.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  5
    Mogens Lærke (2013). Models of the History of Philosophy, Vol. II: From the Cartesian Age to Brucker. Edited By Gregorio Piaia and Giovanni Santinello. (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, Pp. XXIV + 604. Price £224.50 Hb.). [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):400-403.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  7
    Mogens Lærke (2009). The Art of Controversies, G. W. Leibniz Édition, traduction et commentaire par Marcelo Dascal en collaboration avec Quintin Racionero et Adelino Cardoso Dordrecht, Springer , 20082, 520 p. doi:10.1017/S0012217309090106. [REVIEW] Dialogue 48 (1):205.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  5
    Mogens Lærke (2009). Leibniz. An Intellectual Biography Maria Rosa Antognazza Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, Xxvii + 623 Pp. [REVIEW] Dialogue 48 (3):679.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  1
    Mogens Lærke (2010). GW Leibniz's Two Readings of the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. In Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.), Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press 101.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  2
    Mogens Lærke (2007). Leibniz, la censure et la libre pensée. Archives de Philosophie 2:273-287.
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  1
    Mogens Lærke (2009). Catherine Secrétan, Tristan Dagron et Laurent Bove (dir.), Qu'est-ce que les Lumières « radicales » ? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l'âge classique, Paris, Éditions Amsterdam (Caute !), 2007, 404 pages, 24 €. [REVIEW] Astérion 6.
    Ce beau volume rassemble vingt-trois contributions à un colloque international sur le thème des « Lumières radicales », tenu à l’École normale supérieure Lettres et sciences humaines à Lyon en février 2004. L’objectif du colloque était de s’interroger sur le sens et la pertinence de cette catégorie historiographique qui s’est imposée dans l’histoire intellectuelle du xviie et du xviiie siècle depuis quelques décennies déjà, mais avec une force considérable depuis une dizaine d’années. Le volu..
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Mogens Lærke (2011). A Conjecture About a Textual Mystery. Leibniz Society Review 21:33-68.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Mogens Lærke (2009). La Question du mal chez Leibniz. Leibniz Society Review 19:77-91.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Mogens Lærke (2012). Martine de Gaudemar and Philippe Hamou , Locke Et Leibniz. Deux Styles de Rationalité. Leibniz Society Review 22:153-155.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Mogens Lærke (2009). Monism, Separability and Real Distinction in the Young Leibniz. Leibniz Society Review 19:1-28.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Mogens Lærke, Justin E. H. Smith & Eric Schliesser (eds.) (2013). Philosophy and its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press Usa.
    This volume collects contributions from leading scholars of early modern philosophy from a wide variety of philosophical and geographic backgrounds. The distinguished contributors offer very different, competing approaches to the history of philosophy.Many chapters articulate new, detailed methods of doing history of philosophy. These present conflicting visions of the history of philosophy as an autonomous sub-discipline of professional philosophy. Several other chapters offer new approaches to integrating history into one's philosophy by re-telling the history of recent philosophy. A number of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Mogens Lærke, Justin E. H. Smith & Eric Schliesser (eds.) (2013). Philosophy and its History: Aims and Methods in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press Usa.
    This volume collects contributions from leading scholars of early modern philosophy from a wide variety of philosophical and geographic backgrounds. The distinguished contributors offer very different, competing approaches to the history of philosophy.Many chapters articulate new, detailed methods of doing history of philosophy. These present conflicting visions of the history of philosophy as an autonomous sub-discipline of professional philosophy. Several other chapters offer new approaches to integrating history into one's philosophy by re-telling the history of recent philosophy. A number of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Mogens Lærke (2012). Paul Rateau , L’Idée de Théodicée de Leibniz À Kant: Héritage, Transformations, Critiques. Leibniz Society Review 22:157-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Mogens Lærke (2007). Quod Non Omnia Possibilia Ad Existentiam Perveniant. Leibniz Society Review 17:1-30.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Mogens Lærke (2009). Qu’est-ce que les Lumières « radicales » ? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l’'ge classique. [REVIEW] Astérion 6.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Mogens Lærke (2008). Response to Ohad Nachtomy on Possibilia in Leibniz, 1672-1676. Leibniz Society Review 18:259-266.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Mogens Lærke (2011). Toland et Leibniz. L’Invention du néo-spinozisme. Leibniz Society Review 21:165-170.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography