32 found
Sort by:
  1. Mogens Lærke (unknown). Quod Non Omnia Possibilia Ad Existentiam Perveniant: Leibniz's Ontology of Possibility, 1668-1678. :1-30.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Mogens Lærke (2014). Spinoza's Language. Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):519-547.
    when reading spinoza’s Ethics,1 one comes upon a particularly disconcerting passage in Part Three. In an explication of two definitions of ‘favor’ (favor) and ‘indignation’ (indignatio), Spinoza writes,I know that in their common usage these words mean something else. But my purpose is to explain the nature of things, not the meaning of words. I intend to indicate these things by words whose meaning is not entirely opposed to the meaning with which I wish to use them. One warning of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mogens Lærke (2013). Anima Mundi: The Rise of the World Soul Theory in Modern German Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (1):131-132.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Mogens Lærke (2013). Models of the History of Philosophy, Vol. II: From the Cartesian Age to Brucker. Edited By Gregorio Piaia and Giovanni Santinello. (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, Pp. XXIV + 604. Price £224.50 Hb.). [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):400-403.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mogens Lærke (2013). Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):57 - 77.
    (2013). Spinoza and the Cosmological Argument According to Letter 12. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 57-77. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2012.696052.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Mogens Lærke (2012). A Book Forged in Hell. Spinoza's Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):1037-1039.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 0, Issue 0, Page 1-3, Ahead of Print.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Mogens Lærke (2012). A Conjecture About a Textual Mystery. The Leibniz Review 21:33-68.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Mogens Lærke (2012). Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad By Daniel Garber Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, Pp. 428 + Xxi. Philosophy 87 (03):449-452.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Mogens Lærke (2012). Martine de Gaudemar and Philippe Hamou (Eds.), Locke Et Leibniz. Deux Styles de Rationalité. The Leibniz Review 22:153-155.
  10. Mogens Lærke (2012). Paul Rateau (Ed.), L'Idée de Théodicée de Leibniz à Kant: Héritage, Transformations, Critiques. The Leibniz Review 22:157-159.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Mogens Lærke (2012). The Continuum Companion to Spinoza. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):420-425.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 20, Issue 2, Page 420-425, March 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Mogens Lærke (2012). Toland et Leibniz. L'Invention du néo-spinozisme. The Leibniz Review 21:165-170.
  13. Mogens Lærke (2012). The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza's Ethica. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):843 - 847.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 20, Issue 4, Page 843-847, July 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Mogens Lærke (2011). Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58-84.
    In this article, I discuss Leibniz's interpretation of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. In particular, I consider whether Leibniz's position on this point was developed partly in reference to Spinoza's position. First, I analyze Leibniz's annotations from 1676 on Spinoza's Letter 12. The traditional cosmological argument, as found in Avicenna and Saint Thomas for example, relies on the Aristotelian assumption that an actual infinite is impossible and on the idea that there can be no effect without a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Mogens Lærke (2011). Spinoza's Cosmological Argument in the Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):439-462.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Mogens Lærke (2011). Spinoza: une lecture d'Aristote. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):570 - 573.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 3, Page 570-573, May 2011.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Mogens Lærke (2011). The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's 'Ethics'. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (1):149-153.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Mogens Lærke (2010). Four Things Deleuze Learned From Leibniz. In Sjoerd van Tuinen & Niamh McDonnell (eds.), Deleuze and the Fold: A Critical Reader. Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Mogens Lærke (2010). GW Leibniz's Two Readings of the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. In Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.), Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press. 101.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Mogens Lærke (2009). Catherine Secrétan, Tristan Dagron et Laurent Bove (dir.), Qu'est-ce que les Lumières « radicales » ? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l'âge classique, Paris, Éditions Amsterdam (Caute !), 2007, 404 pages, 24 €. [REVIEW] Astérion 6.
    Ce beau volume rassemble vingt-trois contributions à un colloque international sur le thème des « Lumières radicales », tenu à l’École normale supérieure Lettres et sciences humaines à Lyon en février 2004. L’objectif du colloque était de s’interroger sur le sens et la pertinence de cette catégorie historiographique qui s’est imposée dans l’histoire intellectuelle du xviie et du xviiie siècle depuis quelques décennies déjà, mais avec une force considérable depuis une dizaine d’années. Le volu..
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Mogens Lærke (2009). Immanence et extériorité absolue. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de L'Étranger 2 (2):169-190.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Mogens Lærke (2009). Leibniz. An Intellectual Biography Maria Rosa Antognazza Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, Xxvii + 623 Pp. [REVIEW] Dialogue 48 (03):679-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Mogens Lærke (2009). La Question du Mal Chez Leibniz. The Leibniz Review 19:77-91.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Mogens Lærke (2009). The Art of Controversies, G. W. Leibniz Édition, Traduction Et Commentaire Par Marcelo Dascal En Collaboration Avec Quintin Racionero Et Adelino Cardoso Dordrecht, Springer (Coll. «The New Synthese Historical Library»), 20082, 520 P. Doi:10.1017/S0012217309090106. [REVIEW] Dialogue 48 (01):205-.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Mogens Lærke (2009). The Problem of Alloglossia . Leibniz on Spinoza's Innovative Use of Philosophical Language. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (5):939 – 953.
  26. Mogens Lærke (2008). Leibniz selon les Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain François Duchesneau et Jérémie Griard Collection «Analytiques» Paris/Montréal, Vrin/Bellarmin, 2006, 352 p. [REVIEW] Dialogue 47 (3-4):690-.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Mogens Lærke (2008). Leibniz selon les Nouveaux essais sur l'entendement humain. Dialogue 47 (3/4):690-694.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Mogens Lærke (2008). Possibility, Agency and Individuality in Leibniz's Metaphysics Ohad Nachtomy Collection «The New Synthese Historical Library» Dordrecht, Springer, 2007, 268 P. [REVIEW] Dialogue 47 (02):395-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Mogens Lærke (2008). Possibility, Agency and Individuality in Leibniz's Metaphysics. Dialogue 47 (2):395-397.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Mogens Lærke (2008). Response to Ohad Nachtomy on Possibilia in Leibniz, 1672-1676. The Leibniz Review 18:259-266.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Mogens Lærke (2007). Leibniz, la censure et la libre pensée. Archives de Philosophie 2:273-287.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Mogens Lærke (2007). Quod Non Omnia Possibilia Ad Existentiam Perveniant. The Leibniz Review 17:1-30.
    In the Nouveaux Essais, Leibniz famously declared that he once had “begun to lean towards” Spinozist necessitarianism. In this article, I argue that this remark refers to his modal philosophy anterior to 1677. Leibniz’s mature refutation of Spinoza’s necessitarianism relies on the notion that pure possibility has some sort of reality in God’s mind, because only this allows for a strong notion of divine choice. But I believe that Leibniz only developed this ontology of possibility after 1677. Before this date, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation