Search results for 'Monadology' (try it on Scholar)

105 found
Sort by:
  1. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1902/2005). Discourse on Metaphysics, and the Monadology. Dover Publications.score: 24.0
    Two of Leibniz's most studied and often quoted works appear in this volume. Published in 1686, the Discourse on Metaphysics consists of the philosopher's explanation of individual perception as an expression of the rest of the universe from a unique perspective. The whole world--the best of all possible worlds, as he famously remarks--is thus contained in each individual substance. The Monadology, written in 1714, offers a concise synopsis of Leibniz's philosophy, establishing the laws of final causes, which underlie God's (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Vincenzo De Risi (2007). Geometry and Monadology: Leibniz's Analysis Situs and Philosophy of Space. Birkhäuser.score: 21.0
    This book reconstructs, both from the historical and theoretical points of view, Leibniz's geometrical studies, focusing in particular on the research Leibniz ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Anthony Savile (2000). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Leibniz and the Monadology. Routledge.score: 21.0
    Anthony Savile clearly identifies the intellectual assumptions that underlie Leibniz's thought and locates the text within Leibniz's larger philosophical ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1898/1985). The Monadology and Other Philosophical Writings. Garland.score: 21.0
  5. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1930). The Monadology of Leibniz. London, the Favil Press.score: 21.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. T. Nakagomi (2004). Quantum Monadology and Consciousness. In Gordon G. Globus, Karl H. Pribram & Giuseppe Vitiello (eds.), Brain and Being. John Benjamins.score: 21.0
  7. Soshichi Uchii, An Informational Interpretation of Monadology.score: 18.0
    In this paper, I will try to exploit the implication of Leibniz's statement in Monadology (1714) that "there is a kind of self-sufficiency which makes them [monads] sources of their own internal actions, or incorporeal automata, as it were" (Monadology, sect.18). Leibniz's monads are simple substances, with no shape, no magnitude; but they are supposed to produce the phenomena resulting from their activities, which for us humans look as the whole world, the nature. The activities of a monad (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Montgomery Furth (1967). Monadology. Philosophical Review 76 (2):169-200.score: 15.0
  9. Daniel Bonevac, 1898 the Monadology.score: 15.0
    1. The Monad, of which we shall here speak, is nothing but a simple substance, which enters into compounds. By 'simple' is meant 'without parts.' (Theod. 10.).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. D. Garber (2010). Geometry and Monadology: Leibniz's Analysis Situs and Philosophy of Space, by Vincenzo De Risi. Mind 119 (474):472-478.score: 15.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, The Principles of Philosophy Known as Monadology.score: 15.0
    Copyright © 2010–2015 All rights reserved. Jonathan Bennett [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small ·dots· enclose material that has been added, but can be read as though it were part of the original text. Occasional •bullets, and also indenting of passages that are not quotations, are meant as aids to grasping the structure of a sentence or a thought. Every four-point ellipsis . . . . indicates the omission of a brief passage that seems to present more difficulty than it is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Graham Harman (2011). Plastic Surgery for the Monadology: Leibniz Via Heidegger. Cultural Studies Review 17 (1):211-229.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jeffrey K. McDonough, Comments on Daniel Garber's Metaphysics and Theology: The Role of the Monadology in Leibniz's Essais de Théodicée.score: 15.0
    In his rich and engaging essay, Professor Garber asks most centrally, “…what was the relation between Leibniz’s metaphysical project as set out in the so-called ‘Monadologie’ and the more theological project in the Essais de Théodicée?” His answer is, in short, that there isn’t much of a relationship between these two great works. Furthermore, he takes this result to be evidence of Leibniz’s not being a systematic philosopher in the spirit of Descartes or Spinoza. In these brief comments, I revisit (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. James Luchte (2006). Mathesis and Analysis: Finitude and the Infinite in the Monadology of Leibniz. Heythrop Journal 47 (4):519–543.score: 15.0
  15. H. Wildon Carr (1926). The Reform of the Leibnizian Monadology. Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):68-77.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. J. A. Cover (2002). Review: Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Leibniz and the Monadology. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (442):478-482.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1991). Monadology. Routledge.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Homer H. Dubs (1941). The Misleading Nature of Leibniz's Monadology. Philosophical Review 50 (5):508-516.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Diogenes Allen (1966). Monadology and Other Philosophical Essays. By G. W. Leibniz. Translated by Paul Schrecker and Anne Martin Schrecker. ”Library of Liberal Arts”, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc., 1965. Pp. Xxx, 163. Paperback $1.45. [REVIEW] Dialogue 5 (02):278-280.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Robert Latta, Translation and Commentary on the Monadology (1898).score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Monadology (1714).score: 15.0
    Copyright © 2010–2015 All rights reserved. Jonathan Bennett [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small ·dots· enclose material that has been added, but can be read as though it were part of the original text. Occasional •bullets, and also indenting of passages that are not quotations, are meant as aids to grasping the structure of a sentence or a thought. Every four-point ellipsis . . . . indicates the omission of a brief passage that seems to present more difficulty than it is (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (2007). The Monadology. In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub..score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Pierre Cassou-Noguès (2009). Merleau-Ponty, Whitehead, and Russell on Monadology and the Problem of Particulars. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 30 (1):163-177.score: 15.0
  24. George H. Sabine (1915). A New Monadology. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 12 (24):650-657.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Sheldon Smith (2013). Kant's Picture of Monads in the Physical Monadology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):102-111.score: 15.0
  26. H. Wildon Carr (1924). The Crucial Problem in Monadology. The Monist 34 (4):599-614.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. J. Lewis McIntyre (1899). Book Review:Leibniz: The Monadology and Other Philosophical Writings. Robert Latta. [REVIEW] Ethics 9 (3):401-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Christian Uhl, Preliminary Reconsiderations on Nishida Kitarô's 'Dialectical Monadology' and its Political Implications.score: 15.0
    In this paper, I present some preliminary reconsiderations on the interconnection between Nishida Kitarō’s later logic and his political philosophy. These reconsiderations will form the core of an essay in which I intend to use Karatani Kōjin’s remarks concerning a certain “Leibniz-syndrome” in twentieth-century political thought as a starting point for a more in-depth inquiry into Nishida’s philosophy, as an expression of the contradictions and aporias of global capitalist modernity.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Michael Wreen (1986). Monadology of The Brothers Karamazov. Philosophy and Literature 10 (2):318-324.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. A. C. Ewing (1931). The Monadology of Leibniz, By Professor H. Wildon Carr. (London: The Favil Press, 1930). Philosophy 6 (22):265-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. F. R. Ankersmit (2005). Political Monadology. Theory and Event 8 (3).score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. H. Wildon Carr (1918). Philosophy as Monadology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 19:125 - 146.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. J. A. Cover (1991). G. W. Leibniz's Monadology. The Leibniz Review 1:7-8.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. John Earman (1977). Perceptions and Relations in the Monadology. Studia Leibnitiana 9 (2):212 - 230.score: 15.0
    Leibniz vertrat auf der einen Seite die Überzeugung, es gebe Relationen weder als abstrakte Universalien noch als konkrete Akzidenzen. Auf der anderen Seite war er überzeugt, daß es relationale Eigenschaften von physischen Gegenständen, die nicht auf nicht-relationale Eigenschaften dieser Objekte reduziert werden können, gebe. Die wirklichen Einzeldinge haben jedoch keine nicht-formalen relationalen Eigenschaften. Sie stehen zwar in Beziehung oder sind miteinander verknüpft, aber nur durch Perzeptionen, so daß der Begriff Beziehung hier ein Begriff der zweiten Ordnung ist. Die physische Welt (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Carlos A. Segovia (2003). Univocism and Monadology in Post-Avicennan Iranian Philosophy (Sadrâ alShîrâzî's Ishrâqî Hermeneutics Ob Ibn Al-Arabî's Gnosis and His Discussion of Avicennan Ontology). Endoxa: Series Filosóficas 16:195-210.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Kunio Yasue (1999). Quantum monadology. In Stuart R. Hameroff, Alfred W. Kaszniak & David J. Chalmers (eds.), Toward a Science of Consciousness Iii. Mit Press.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Mattia Geretto (2004). Leibniz in the Monadology of Bernardino Varisco. Filosofia 55 (2-3):A49 - A93.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. K. Kochy (2004). Perspectivistic Architectonics of The'Monadology'. On the Relationship of Content and Form of Philosophy with Leibniz. Studia Leibnitiana 36 (2):232-253.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (2004). Extract From Monadology. In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: A Guide and Anthology. Oup Oxford.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1965). Monadology, and Other Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill Co..score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Stepping Back Inside Leibniz'S. Milv (1998). 1. Monadology § 17 Leibniz Presents the Example of a Mill in a Number of Letters and Essays Which Are Concerned with the Issue of Whether There Could Be Thinking Machines. 2 However its Appearance in § 17 of the M Onadolo Gy has Drawn by Far the Most Attention From Recent Philosophers. 3 Let Us Begin. [REVIEW] The Monist 81 (4):553-572.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Nicholas Rescher (1992). G.W. Leibniz's Monadology. Routledge.score: 15.0
    First published in 1992. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. A. Savile & O. Meo (2001). Recensioni-Leibniz and the" Monadology". Epistemologia 24 (2):364-366.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. H. Schepers (2003). 'De Affectibus'. Leibniz at the Threshold Of'Monadology', His Preparatory Works on the Logical Configuration of the Possible Worlds. Studia Leibnitiana 35 (2):133-161.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. A. Shimony (1995). The Confrontation and Monadology. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 161:29-29.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Robert Sleigh (2003). GW Leibniz, Monadology (1714). In Jorge J. E. Gracia, Gregory M. Reichberg & Bernard N. Schumacher (eds.), The Classics of Western Philosophy: A Reader's Guide. Blackwell Pub.. 277.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. J. Sytnik-Czetwertynski (2008). Physical Monadology as Kant's Position in the Dispute with Leibniz and Newton. Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 36 (1):106-119.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Evelyn Vargas (2007). Synechism and Monadology. In. In P. Phemister & S. Brown (eds.), Leibniz and the English-Speaking World. Springer. 181--193.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Stewart Duncan (2012). Leibniz's Mill Arguments Against Materialism. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):250-72.score: 9.0
    Leibniz's mill argument in 'Monadology' 17 is a well-known but puzzling argument against materialism about the mind. I approach the mill argument by considering other places where Leibniz gave similar arguments, using the same example of the machinery of a mill and reaching the same anti-materialist conclusion. In a 1702 letter to Bayle, Leibniz gave a mill argument that moves from his definition of perception (as the expression of a multitude by a simple) to the anti-materialist conclusion. Soon afterwards, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Richard Tieszen (2012). Monads and Mathematics: Gödel and Husserl. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (1):31-52.score: 9.0
    In 1928 Edmund Husserl wrote that “The ideal of the future is essentially that of phenomenologically based (“philosophical”) sciences, in unitary relation to an absolute theory of monads” (“Phenomenology”, Encyclopedia Britannica draft) There are references to phenomenological monadology in various writings of Husserl. Kurt Gödel began to study Husserl’s work in 1959. On the basis of his later discussions with Gödel, Hao Wang tells us that “Gödel’s own main aim in philosophy was to develop metaphysics—specifically, something like the (...) of Leibniz transformed into exact theory—with the help of phenomenology.” (A Logical Journey: From Gödel to Philosophy, p. 166) In the Cartesian Meditations and other works Husserl identifies ‘monads’ (in his sense) with ‘transcendental egos in their full concreteness’. In this paper I explore some prospects for a Gödelian monadology that result from this identification, with reference to texts of Gödel and to aspects of Leibniz’s original monadology. (shrink)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 105