Search results for 'Monism History' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Todd H. Weir (ed.) (2012). Monism: Science, Philosophy, Religion, and the History of a Worldview. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 168.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Georgiĭ Valentinovich Plekhanov (1972). The Development of the Monist View of History. Moscow,Progress Publishers.score: 132.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Christopher D. Horvath (1997). Discussion: Phylogenetic Species Concept: Pluralism, Monism, and History. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 12 (2):225-232.score: 120.0
    Species serve as both the basic units of macroevolutionary studies and as the basic units of taxonomic classification. In this paper I argue that the taxa identified as species by the Phylogenetic Species Concept (Mishler and Brandon 1987) are the units of biological organization most causally relevant to the evolutionary process but that such units exist at multiple levels within the hierarchy of any phylogenetic lineage. The PSC gives us no way of identifying one of these levels as the privileged (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Paul Guyer (2013). Monism and Pluralism in the History of Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (2):133-143.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ganeswar Misra (1986). Sources of Monism: Bradley and Śaṅkara. Anu Books.score: 90.0
  6. Steindór J. Erlingsson (2002). From Haeckelian Monist to Anti-Haeckelian Vitalist: The Transformation of the Icelandic Naturalist Thorvaldur Thoroddsen (1855-1921). [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 35 (3):443 - 470.score: 72.0
    Iceland has not been known as a contributor to the history of science. This small nation in the North-Atlantic has only in recent decades made its mark on international science. But the Icelandic naturalist Thorvaldur Thoroddsen (1855-1921) is an exception to this generalisation, for he was well known at the turn of the 20th century in Europe and America for his research on the geography and geology of Iceland. Though Thoroddsen's contribution to these sciences is of great interest there (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Heiner Fangerau (2012). Monism, Racial Hygiene, and National Socialism. In Todd H. Weir (ed.), Monism: Science, Philosophy, Religion, and the History of a Worldview. Palgrave Macmillanscore: 66.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Klaus Müller (2006). Streit Um Gott: Politik, Poetik Und Philosophie Im Ringen Um Das Wahre Gottesbild. Verlag F. Pustet.score: 60.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. I. Grattan-Guinness (2011). Omnipresence, Multipresence and Ubiquity: Kinds of Generality in and Around Mathematics and Logics. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 5 (1):21-73.score: 54.0
    A prized property of theories of all kinds is that of generality, of applicability or least relevance to a wide range of circumstances and situations. The purpose of this article is to present a pair of distinctions that suggest that three kinds of generality are to be found in mathematics and logics, not only at some particular period but especially in developments that take place over time: ‘omnipresent’ and ‘multipresent’ theories, and ‘ubiquitous’ notions that form dependent parts, or moments, of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Paul Ziche (2012). Monist Philosophy of Science : Between Worldview and Scientific Meta-Reflection. In Todd H. Weir (ed.), Monism: Science, Philosophy, Religion, and the History of a Worldview. Palgrave Macmillanscore: 54.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Peter J. Bowler (2012). Monism in Britain : Biologists and the Rationalist Press Association. In Todd H. Weir (ed.), Monism: Science, Philosophy, Religion, and the History of a Worldview. Palgrave Macmillanscore: 54.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Sander Gliboff (2012). Monism and Morphology at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. In Todd H. Weir (ed.), Monism: Science, Philosophy, Religion, and the History of a Worldview. Palgrave Macmillanscore: 54.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Frederick Gregory (2012). Proto-Monism in German Philosophy, Theology, and Science, 1800 to 1845. In Todd H. Weir (ed.), Monism: Science, Philosophy, Religion, and the History of a Worldview. Palgrave Macmillanscore: 54.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Tracie Matysik (2012). Spinozist Monism : Perspectives From Within and Without the Monist Movement. In Todd H. Weir (ed.), Monism: Science, Philosophy, Religion, and the History of a Worldview. Palgrave Macmillanscore: 54.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Cian O'Driscoll (2009). Hedgehog or Fox? An Essay on James Turner Johnson's View of History. Journal of Military Ethics 8 (3):165-178.score: 54.0
    Drawing on Isaiah Berlin's celebrated essay on Tolstoy, this paper poses the question should James Turner Johnson be deemed a hedgehog or a fox? That is, it considers whether Johnson should be regarded as a monist (hedgehog) or a pluralist (fox) in his contribution to the just war tradition. It contends that his commitment to history, while superficially indicative of a hedgehog, serves to conceal a deep-lying pluralism ? or at least the possibility of such ? in his views (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Nicolaas Rupke (2012). Alexander von Humboldt and Monism. In Todd H. Weir (ed.), Monism: Science, Philosophy, Religion, and the History of a Worldview. Palgrave Macmillanscore: 54.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Todd H. Weir (2012). The Riddles of Monism: An Introductory Essay. In Monism: Science, Philosophy, Religion, and the History of a Worldview. Palgrave Macmillanscore: 54.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Norbert M. Samuelson (2011). Reflections on the Distinctness of Judaism and the Sciences. Zygon 46 (2):396-412.score: 48.0
    Abstract. The object of this essay is to explain what there is about discussions of Judaism and the sciences that is distinctive from discussions about religion in general and the sciences. The description draws primarily but not exclusively from recent meetings of the Judaism, Medicine, and Science Group in Tempe, Arizona. The author's Jewish Faith and Modern Science, together with a selective bibliography of writings in this subfield, are used to generate a list of science issues—focused around the religious doctrines (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Joanne A. Wood (1994). Lighthouse Bodies: The Neutral Monism of Virginia Woolf and Bertrand Russell. Journal of the History of Ideas 55 (3):483-502.score: 48.0
  20. Thomas Möllenbeck (ed.) (2009). Geist - Natur: Schöpfung Zwischen Monismus Und Dualismus. Aschendorff.score: 48.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. James Thompson (2012). Democracy, Monism and the Common Good: Rethinking William Clarke's Political Religion. History of European Ideas 38 (2):233-247.score: 42.0
    Summary This article re-examines the political thought of the neglected Fabian essayist and radical journalist William Clarke. Historians have differed over the relative importance of socialism and liberalism in Clarke's political thought. The argument is made here that the key to Clarke's thought lies in his moralised conception of democracy, rooted in his monist ontology. The further deepening of democracy was threatened for Clarke by developments in monopolistic capitalism and the related emergence of a new imperialism. Clarke's understanding of democracy, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Michael Friedman (2010). A Post-Kuhnian Approach to the History and Philosophy of Science. The Monist 93 (4):497-517.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Martial Gueroult (1969). The History of Philosophy as a Philosophical Problem. The Monist 53 (4):563-587.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Andrew J. Nicholson (2010). Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History. Columbia University Press.score: 36.0
    Some postcolonial theorists argue that the idea of a single system of belief known as "Hinduism" is a creation of nineteenth-century British imperialists. Andrew J. Nicholson introduces another perspective: although a unified Hindu identity is not as ancient as some Hindus claim, it has its roots in innovations within South Asian philosophy from the fourteenth to seventeenth centuries. During this time, thinkers treated the philosophies of Vedanta, Samkhya, and Yoga, along with the worshippers of Visnu, Siva, and Sakti, as belonging (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Noël Carroll (1990). Interpretation, History and Narrative. The Monist 73 (2):134-166.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Mark A. Kulstad (1996). Spinoza's Demonstration of Monism: A New Line of Defense. History of Philosophy Quarterly 13 (3):299 - 316.score: 36.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Eric Schliesser (2011). Newton's Substance Monism, Distant Action, and the Nature of Newton's Empiricism: Discussion of H. Kochiras “Gravity and Newton's Substance Counting Problem”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):160-166.score: 36.0
    This paper is a critical response to Hylarie Kochiras’ “Gravity and Newton’s substance counting problem,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 267–280. First, the paper argues that Kochiras conflates substances and beings; it proceeds to show that Newton is a substance monist. The paper argues that on methodological grounds Newton has adequate resources to respond to the metaphysical problems diagnosed by Kochiras. Second, the paper argues against the claim that Newton is committed to two speculative doctrines attributed (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Thomas R. Flynn (1991). Foucault and the Spaces of History. The Monist 74 (2):165-186.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Dudley Shapere (1977). What Can the Theory of Knowledge Learn From the History of Knowledge? The Monist 60 (4):488-508.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Hayden V. White (1969). The Tasks of Intellectual History. The Monist 53 (4):606-630.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Gyula Klima (2007). Thomistic “Monism” Vs. Cartesian “Dualism”. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 10:92-112.score: 36.0
    This paper contrasts the Thomistic and Cartesian interpretations of what the substantial unity of the body and mind can consist in. A detailed discussion of the Thomistic account of the substantial unity of body and soul identifies especially those principles of the presupposed hylomorphist metaphysical background of this account that Descartes abandoned. After arguing for the consistency of the Thomistic view, briefly outlines how certain developments in late-medieval scholasticism prepared the way for the abandonment of precisely these principles. Finally, the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Herman Tennessen (1969). History is Science. The Monist 53 (1):116-133.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Rudolf Eucken (1896). Philosophical Terminology and its History. The Monist 6 (4):497-515.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Jeremy R. Garrett (2008). History, Tradition, and the Normative Foundations of Civil Marriage. The Monist 91 (3/4):446-474.score: 36.0
  35. Adolf Trendelenburg (1910). A Contribution to the History of the Word Person. The Monist 20 (3):336-363.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Wilhelm Obers Focke (1913). History of Plant Hybrids. The Monist 23 (3):396-416.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Thomas Mathien (1991). History and the Moralist. The Monist 74 (2):240-267.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Tom Rockmore (1991). Subjectivity and the Ontology of History. The Monist 74 (2):187-205.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. J. H. Faurot (1969). What is History of Philosophy? The Monist 53 (4):642-655.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Charles C. Torrey (1915). A New Era in the History of the “Apocrypha”. The Monist 25 (2):286-294.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. John F. Fox (1996). Towards Metamethodology: For the History and Philosophy of Science. In P. Riggs (ed.), Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology. Kluwer Academic Publishers 103--121.score: 36.0
    Much philosophy of science is methodology of science. How should one go about doing and evaluating it? The question is one of the methodology of methodology, i.e. of metamethodology. There is a vague thesis common to Descartes and more recent philosophers such as Quine and Lakatos: that what is good methodology, good evidence, good reason for accepting, rejecting or revising beliefs in mathematics and in the sciences properly so called, does not differ in significant kind from what is good methodology, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Hans-Georg Gadamer & Karen Campbell (1981). Heidegger and the History of Philosophy. The Monist 64 (4):434-444.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Karim J. Gherab-Martin (2013). From Structuralism to Neutral Monism in Arthur S. Eddington's Philosophy of Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 44 (4):500-512.score: 36.0
    Arthur S. Eddington is remembered as one of the best astrophysicists and popularizers of physics in the twentieth century. Nevertheless, his stimulating speculations in philosophy produced serious disputes among philosophers of his time, his philosophy remaining linked to idealism and mysticism. This paper shows this label to be misleading and argues for the identification of Eddington's philosophy with a kind of neutral monism regained from Bertrand Russell and influenced by the Gestalt psychology. The concept of structure is fundamental to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Margaret W. Landes (1920). Richard Burthogge, His Life and His Place in the History of Philosophy. The Monist 30 (2):253-266.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Robert G. Shoemaker (1969). Inference and Intuition in Collingwood's Philosophy of History. The Monist 53 (1):100-115.score: 36.0
  46. Richard Shusterman (1988). Essence, History, and Narrative. The Monist 71 (2):183-196.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki (1908). A Brief History of Early Chinese Philosophy. Part II. The Monist 18 (2):242-285.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki (1907). A Brief History of Early Chinese Philosophy. Part I. The Monist 17 (3):415-450.score: 36.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Guido Villa (1902). Psychology and History. The Monist 12 (2):215-235.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. George Boas (1969). The Problem of History. The Monist 53 (1):90-99.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000