15 found
Sort by:
  1. Murat Baç (2012). Ernest Sosa, Knowing Full Well. Prolegomena 11 (1):118-122.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Murat Baç (2011). Pluralistic Kantianism and Understanding The. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 11:13-18.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Murat Bac (2011). Truth as One and Many. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):122-125.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Murat Bac & Nurbay Irmak (2011). Knowing Wrongly: An Obvious Oxymoron, or a Threat for the Alleged Universality of Epistemological Analyses? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):305-321.
    The traditional tripartite and tetrapartite analyses describe the conceptual components of propositional knowledge from a universal epistemic point of view. According to the classical analysis, since truth is a necessary condition of knowledge, it does not make sense to talk about “false knowledge” or “knowing wrongly.” There are nonetheless some natural languages in which speakers ordinarily make statements about a person’s knowing a given subject matter wrongly. In this paper, we first provide a brief analysis of “knowing wrongly” in Turkish. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Murat Baç (2010). Truth as One and Many. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):122 – 125.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Murat Baç (2009). Memories of the Fourth Condition and Lessons to Be Learned From Suspicious Externalism. Organon F 16 (2):127-145.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Murat Baç (2007). Pluralistic Kantianism and Understanding the "Other". The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 11:13-18.
    In this paper I present Pluralistic Kantianism as a viable alternative to other prominent accounts of the determination of the truth conditions of our ordinary empirical statements. I further claim that this sort of Kantianism is capable of handling certain theoretical difficulties faced by any scheme-based semantics. Moreover, Pluralistic Kantianism can shed some light on such crucial issues as cross-cultural communication and understanding. As a result, if the account offered here is on the right track, we may get a palatable (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Murat Bac (2006). Pluralistic Kantianism. Philosophical Forum 37 (2):183-204.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Murat Baç (2006). Pluralistic Kantianism. Philosophical Forum 37 (2):183–204.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Murat Baç (2004). Can Realists Know That They Know? Acta Analytica 19 (32):65-90.
    Realists typically suppose that nonepistemic truth is an independent condition on propositional knowledge. Few philosophers, however, have seriously questioned the meta-epistemic consequences of combining alethic and epistemic variants of realism. In this paper I aim to show that the truth condition in the customary definition of knowledge presents an important problem for the realist at higher epistemic levels. According to my argument, traditional epistemic-logical analyses of metaknowledge fail because of their extensionalism and certain presuppositions they have about the satisfaction of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Murat Baç & Renée Elio (2004). Scheme-Based Alethic Realism: Agency, the Environment, and Truthmaking. Minds and Machines 14 (2):173-196.
    This paper presents a position called Scheme-based Alethic Realism, which reconciles a realist position on the nature of truth with a pluralistic Kantian perspective that allows for multiple environments in which truthmaking relationships are established. We argue that truthmaking functions are constrained by a stable phenomenal world and a stable cognitive architecture. This account takes truth as normatively distinct from epistemic justification while relativizing the truth conditions of our statements to what we call Frameworks. The pluralistic aspect allows that these (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Murat Baç (2003). The Ontological Status of Truthmakers: An Alternative to Tractarianism and Metaphysical Anti-Realism. Metaphysica 4 (2):5-28.
    This paper aims to describe and defend a Pluralistic Kantian, as opposed to a Tractarian, version of realism vis-à-vis the ontological basis of truthmaking relations. One underlying assumption of my position is that propositional truth is a robust property and, consequently, is normatively distinct from epistemic justification. Still, it does not follow from this realist contention that truth is generated ontologically, viz., independently of cognitive and intensional contributions of human agents. This point brings my view notably close to H. Putnam’s (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Murat BaÇ (2000). Structure Versus Process: Mach, Hertz, and the Normative Aspect of Science. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (1):39-56.
    In the end of the nineteenth century, there was a remarkable ‘empiricist attitude’ found among certain philosopher-scientists, an attitude which arguably emerged in the main as a reaction to the anti-scientific mood prevalent in the culture that time. Those philosopher-scientists, such as Mach and Hertz, were particularly anxious to emphasize and laud the privileged status of the empirical dimension ofour scientific knowledge, distinguishing it carefully from the theoretical constructions and hypothetical entities that are ordinarily posited by scientists. Yet, as I (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Murat Baç (1999). Is Causation "In Here" or "Out There"? Hume's Two Definitions of "Cause". History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (1):19 - 35.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Murat Baç (1999). Propositional Knowledge and the Enigma of Realism. Philosophia 27 (1-2):199-223.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation