Search results for 'Murray Lewis Miles' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Leon Roth, E. Gilman, R. J. Spilsbury, H. D. Lewis, Karl Britton, G. H. Bird, P. T. Geach, R. N. Smart, R. Rhees, Margaret Macdonald, Basil Mitchell, D. Daiches Raphael, A. M. MacIver, J. L. Ackrill, Martha Kneale & T. R. Miles (1956). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 65 (259):410-430.score: 1200.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. A. D. Baddeley, N. C. Ellis, T. R. Miles & V. J. Lewis (1982). Developmental and Acquired Dyslexia: A Comparison. Cognition 11 (2):185-199.score: 1200.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Murray Lewis Miles (1999). Insight and Inference: Descartes's Founding Principle and Modern Philosophy. University of Toronto Press.score: 290.0
    Descartes's achievement is a radical reversal of the order of knowing, a subjectivism that places knowledge of the mind ahead of knowledge of material things, ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Murray Lewis Miles (1983). Psycho-Physical Union: The Problem of the Person in Descartes. Dialogue 22 (01):23-46.score: 290.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Andrew Beards, James Duerlinger, Lewis S. Ford, Sherwin Klein, Murray Miles, J. Wennemann & George Allen (1988). Index to Volume Lxv. Modern Schoolman 65:297.score: 270.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Murray Miles (2006). Kant's 'Copernican Revolution': Toward Rehabilitation of a Concept and Provision of a Framework for the Interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason. Kant Studien 97 (1):1-32.score: 120.0
  7. Murray Miles (2010). Analytic Method, the Cogito, and Descartes's Argument for the Innateness of the Idea of God. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2):289-320.score: 120.0
    The analytic method by which Descartes discovered the first principle of his philosophy—cogito, ergo sum—is a unique cognitive process of direct insight and nonlogical inference. It differs markedly from inductive as well as deductive procedures, but also from older models of the direct noetic apprehension of first principles, notably those of Plato and Aristotle. However, a critical examination of Descartes’s argument for the innateness of the idea of God shows that there are serious obstacles in the way of his employment (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David Lewis (1974). Spielman and Lewis on Inductive Immodesty. Philosophy of Science 41 (1):84-85.score: 120.0
  9. Murray Miles (1994). Leibniz on Apperception and Animal Souls. Dialogue 33 (04):701-.score: 120.0
  10. Mary Ann Baily & Thomas H. Murray (2009). Mary Ann Baily and Thomas H. Murray Reply. Hastings Center Report 39 (1):7-7.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Murray Miles (2010). Connaissance de Dieu Et Conscience de Soi Chez Descartes. Dialogue 49 (01):1-24.score: 120.0
    ABSTRACT: The analytic method by which Descartes established the first principle of his philosophy (cogito, ergo sum) is a unique cognitive process of direct insight and non-logical inference that differs markedly from the deductive model of noetic apprehension long associated with seventeenth-century rationalism. In this paper, it is shown that the same analytic process is at work in the Third Meditation proof of the innateness of the idea of God, where, however, there are serious doubts about its legitimacy.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Murray Miles (1988). Descartes' Mechanicism and the Medieval Doctrine of Causes, Qualities, and Forms. The Modern Schoolman 65 (2):97-117.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Murray Miles (1997). Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz: The Concept of Substance in Seventeenth Century Metaphysics R. S. Woolhouse London and New York: Routledge, 1993, 214 Pp. [REVIEW] Dialogue 36 (03):659-.score: 120.0
  14. Murray Miles (1994). Fundamental Ontology and Existential Analysis in Heidegger's Being and Time. International Philosophical Quarterly 34 (3):349-359.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Terri Murray & Lewis Rose (2010). Se7en. Philosophy Now 78:42-43.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Paul Cartledge, W. M. Calder Iii, R. S. Smith, J. Vaio & George Cornewall Lewis (2003). Teaching the English Wissenschaft. The Letters of Sir George Cornewall Lewis to Karl Otfried MüllerTeaching the English Wissenschaft. The Letters of Sir George Cornewall Lewis to Karl Otfried Muller. Journal of Hellenic Studies 123:262.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. D. M. Lewis (1973). Naphtali Lewis: Greek Historical Documents: The Fifth Century B.C. Pp. Xii+125. Toronto: Hakkert, 1971. Paper, $2.25. The Classical Review 23 (02):283-284.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Murray Miles (1989). Heidegger and the Question of Humanism. Man and World 22 (4):427-451.score: 120.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Murray Miles (1988). McRae on Innate Ideas: A Rejoinder. Dialogue 27 (01):29-.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Murray Miles (1988). The Idea of Extension: Innate or Adventitious? On R. F. McRae's Interpretation of Descartes. Dialogue 27 (01):15-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. C. S. Lewis (1991). Lewis Explains His Reasons for Distrusting the so-Called. The Chesterton Review 17 (3/4):541-542.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Murray Miles (1987). Frank Schalow, Imagination and Existence. Heidegger's Retrieval of Kant's Ethics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 7 (3):130-132.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Murray Miles (2007). Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Review of Metaphysics 61 (1):166-167.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. D. W. Hamlyn, Clarence Irving Lewis, John D. Goheen & John L. Mothershead (1972). Collected Papers of Clarence Irving Lewis. Philosophical Quarterly 22 (86):68.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Frank Jackson, Graham Priest & David Lewis (2004). How Many Lives Has Schrodinger's Cat? The Estate of David Kellogg Lewis. Thanks for Valuable Comments Are Due to David Albert, DM Armstrong, Phillip Bricker, Jeremy Butterfield, David Chalmers, John Collins, Adam Elga, Alan Hajek, Richard Hanley, Rae Langton, Peter Lewis, Stephanie Lewis, Barry Loewer, Jonathan Schaffer, Bas van Fraassen, Steven Weinstein, and Sam Wheeler. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):3-22.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. C. S. Lewis (1991). Letter From Lewis to Mr and Mrs Sheldon Vanauken. The Chesterton Review 17 (3/4):538-539.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. H. A. Lewis (1973). Modal Logic: The Lewis‐Modal Systems. Philosophical Books 14 (3):33-34.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Hywel David Lewis, Stewart R. Sutherland & T. A. Roberts (eds.) (1989). Religion, Reason, and the Self: Essays in Honour of Hywel D. Lewis. University of Wales Press.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Clarence Irving Lewis & Paul Arthur Schilpp (eds.) (1968). The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis. La Salle, Ill.,Open Court.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Murray Miles (2004). Überlegungen zum metaphysikbegriff kants. Perspektiven der Philosophie 30 (1):37-62.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Murray Miles (1993). Leibniz Et la Méthode de la Science. The Leibniz Review 3:2-7.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Murray Miles (1988). Marcelo Dascal, Leibniz: Language, Signs and Thought Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 8 (7):258-260.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Lindley Murray (1996). Lindley Murray: The Educational Works. Routledge.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Isobel Murray (1983). "The Revenge for Love," by Wyndham Lewis. The Chesterton Review 9 (3):276-278.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Murray Singer, David M. Bronstein & Jaye M. Miles (1981). Effect of Noise on Priming in a Lexical Decision Task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18 (4):187-190.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. David Lewis (2000). Causation as Influence. Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):182-197.score: 90.0
  37. David Lewis (1981). Are We Free to Break the Laws? Theoria 47 (3):113-21.score: 90.0
    I insist that I was able to raise my hand, and I acknowledge that a law would have been broken had I done so, but I deny that I am therefore able to break a law. To uphold my instance of soft determinism, I need not claim any incredible powers. To uphold the compatibilism that I actually believe, I need not claim that such powers are even possible. My incompatibilist opponent is a creature of fiction, but he has his prototypes (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. David Lewis (1969). Lucas Against Mechanism. Philosophy 44 (June):231-3.score: 90.0
  39. David Lewis (1979). Lucas Against Mechanism II. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (June):373-6.score: 90.0
  40. John Corcoran, Stephen F. Barker, Eric Dayton, John Greco, Naomi Zack, Richard S. Robin, Joel Isaac & Murray G. Murphey (2006). A Symposium on Murray G. Murphey, CI Lewis: The Last Great Pragmatist. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):1-77.score: 39.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Naomi Zack (2006). Murray Murphey's Work and C. I. Lewis's Epistemology: Problems with Realism and the Context of Logical Positivism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):32-44.score: 36.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Robert Sinclair (2007). C. I. Lewis: The Last Great Pragmatist. By Murray G. Murphey. Metaphilosophy 38 (5):718-725.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. François Duchesneau (1992). Leibniz Lexicon: A Dual Concordance to Leibniz's Philosophischen Schriften Compilé Par Reinhard Finster, Graeme Hunter, Robert F. McRae, Murray Miles Et William E. Seager Hildesheim, Olms-Weidmann, 1988, Vii, 419 P., 98 DM. [REVIEW] Dialogue 31 (02):341-.score: 36.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Stephen Gaselee (1936). Postclassica Varia W. J. Entwistle: The Spanish Language, Together with Portuguese, Catalan, and Basque. Pp. Viii+367. London: Faber and Faber, 1936. Cloth, 12s. 6d. Bibliotheca Scriptorum Medii Recentisque Aevorum, ten Instalments (See P. 163). C. S. Lewis : The Allegory of Love, A Study in Medieval Tradition. Pp. Ix+378. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936. Cloth, 15s. H. D. Watson: The Hunting of the Snark, by Lewis Carroll. Translated Into Latin Elegiacs. With Translator's Note Appended on the Inner Meaning of the Poem and Other Things. With a Foreword by Professor Gilbert Murray. Pp. Xvi+115. Oxford: Blackwell, 1936. Cloth, 5s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (05):181-183.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Anthony Jenkins (2004). Insight and Inference: Descartes's Founding Principle and Modern Philosophy Murray Miles Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999, Xviii + 564 Pp., $120.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 43 (01):178-.score: 36.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. J. Cottingham (2000). Murray Miles: Insight and Inference: Descartes' Founding Principle and Modern Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (3):555-557.score: 36.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Joel Isaac (2006). Why Not Lewis? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):54-60.score: 27.0
    This is a discussion of Murray Murphey on the philosophy of C.I. Lewis and his relation to the pragmatist tradition.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Jessica M. Wilson (forthcoming). Hume's Dictum and Metaphysical Modality: Lewis's Combinatorialism. In Barry Loewer & Jonathan Schaffer (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to David Lewis. Blackwell.score: 21.0
    Many contemporary philosophers accept Hume's Dictum (HD), according to which there are no metaphysically necessary connections between distinct, intrinsically typed entities. Tacit in Lewis's work is a potential motivation for HD, according to which one should accept HD as presupposed by the best account of the range of metaphysical possibilities---namely, a combinatorial account, applied to spatiotemporal fundamentalia. Here I elucidate and assess this Ludovician motivation for HD. After refining HD and surveying its key, recurrent role in Lewis’s work, (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. John Greco (2006). How to Be a Pragmatist: C. I. Lewis and Humean Skepticism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):24-31.score: 21.0
    Murray G. Murphey’s masterful treatment of C. I. Lewis’s philosophy leaves two things amply clear: first, that Lewis struggled with skeptical arguments from Hume throughout his career; and second, that Lewis never adequately resolved the problems raised by those arguments. In this paper I will consider Lewis’s approach to Hume’s skepticism in Mind and the World Order (MWO) and in An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation (AKV), and I will argue that Lewis’s reply to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Phillip Bricker (2006). David Lewis: On the Plurality of Worlds. In John Shand (ed.), Central Works of Philosophy, Vol. 5: The Twentieth Century: Quine and After. Acumen Publishing.score: 18.0
    David Lewis's book 'On the Plurality of Worlds' mounts an extended defense of the thesis of modal realism, that the world we inhabit the entire cosmos of which we are a part is but one of a vast plurality of worlds, or cosmoi, all causally and spatiotemporally isolated from one another. The purpose of this article is to provide an accessible summary of the main positions and arguments in Lewis's book.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 999