8 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Nader Chokr [5]Nader N. Chokr [3]
  1. Nader Chokr (forthcoming). A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy. Social Epistemology.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Nader N. Chokr (2008). 'Philosophy' –After the End of Philosophy? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 4:9-27.
    In the past few decades, ‘postmodern philosophers’ have leveled severe and sustained criticisms against “the Tradition.” They have radically put in question and undermined our traditional conceptions of Philosophy, its tasks and goals, claims and pretensions, methods and methodologies, its public image and selfimage.In short, everything that Philosophers once held dear, and that some still hold dear today, moved as they are by a quest for Certainty and nostalgia for the Absolute. As a result, many have come to view these (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Nader N. Chokr (2006). John McCumber, Reshaping Reason: Toward a New Philosophy Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 26 (3):210-213.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Nader Chokr (1993). Clusters' Last Stand. Social Epistemology 7 (4):329 – 353.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Nader Chokr (1993). Replies to Critics. Social Epistemology 7 (4):369 – 386.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Nader N. Chokr (1993). Nelson Goodman on Truth, Relativism, and Criteria of Rightness Or Why We Should Dispense with Truth and Adopt Rightness? Dialectica 47 (1):55-73.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Nader Chokr (1986). Prescription Versus Description in Philosophy of Science, or Methodology Versus History: A Critical Assessment. Metaphilosophy 17 (4):289-299.
    This paper examines critically the current state of affairs in philosophy of science. It focuses on the well-Known puzzle about the relationship between the normative prescriptive methodology of science and positive descriptive history of science. This puzzle has dogged philosophers of science for over a generation and is still controversial. My conclusion is that there is really no escape from it. The best way to characterize it is as follows: "philosophy of science without history of science is empty; history of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Nader Chokr (1985). Nuclear Technology, the Threat and the Urgency to Philosophize. World Futures 21 (1):1-21.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation