5 found
See also:
Profile: Nancy J. Matchett (University of Northern Colorado)
  1.  4
    Nancy J. Matchett (2015). Philosophical Counseling as an Alternative Process to Bioethics Mediation. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (1):56-58.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  3
    Lee Anne Peck & Nancy J. Matchett (2010). An Online Ethics Training Module for Public Relations Professionals. Public Relations Journal 4 (4).
    Researchers developed and tested an online training module with both experienced public relations professionals and newcomers to the field with the hopes of helping them sharpen and refine their ethical decision-making skills. The study found that although most testers reported the Web site was difficult to navigate and/or found the ethical content to be complex, the majority believed their ethical decision-making abilities were improved.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  10
    Nancy J. Matchett (2010). Sexual Dimorphism and the Value of Feminist Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):18-20.
    Robert Sparrow has recently claimed that unless there are reasons to think the sexed nature of human beings is normatively significant, current trends in bioethical reasoning force the conclusion that “we may do well to move toward a ‘post sex’ humanity” (American Journal of Bioethics 10: 7 (2010)). This commentary uses basic methodological principles from feminist ethics to argue that he has, in fact, given no reasons to think that a 'post sex' humanity is any more valuable than gender diverse (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. Nancy J. Matchett (2015). Philosophy for Life and Other Dangerous Situations. [REVIEW] Philosophical Practice: Journal of the American Philosophical Practitioners Association (American Philosophical Practitioners Association) 10 (1).
  5. Nancy J. Matchett (1998). The Virtues of Sharing. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park
    In "The Virtues of Sharing" I defend two central theses: that sharing is our most overarching ethical ideal, and that virtue ethics is able to serve as a comprehensive and free-standing approach to moral theory. My arguments for these theses are intertwined, because they are also designed to show how a virtue-ethical theory that treats the "Will to Share" as the basis of moral agency helps to resolve the contemporary Justice/Care Debate. ;Although rooted in the history of western moral philosophy, (...)
    Export citation  
    My bibliography