8 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Nancy Maull [4]Nancy L. Maull [4]
  1. Nancy Maull (1986). Spinoza in the Century of Science. In. In Marjorie G. Grene & Debra Nails (eds.), Spinoza and the Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 3--13.
  2. Nancy L. Maull (1982). Berkeley on the Limits of Mechanistic Explanation. In Colin M. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Nancy Maull (1981). The Practical Science of Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (2):165-182.
    Contemporary medicine, it is argued here, employs reductive explanations, but at the same time resists wholesale reduction to ‘deeper’ biochemical and physical fields or theories. In its own reductive explanations, to be sure, medicine borrows causal concepts from other fields and so necessarily shares certain explanatory goals with those deeper fields. However, because medicine has additional, distinctive goals as well as a special subject matter and problems (it is a practical science), the field of medicine is ultimately irreducible.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Nancy Maull (1978). Perception and Primary Qualities. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:3 - 17.
    The doctrine of primary qualities is commonly explained as science's return to a former ideal of mathematical intelligibility and as a sacrifice of the notion that we can be certain about what we perceive. According to the standard chronicle modern scientific explanations appeal to geometrically intelligible, yet theoretically imperceptible, particles. This thesis gains plausibility only by suppressing the role of physiological optics in the development of modern science. Descartes presented an original and significant theory of scientific observation in his Dioptrics; (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Nancy L. Maull (1978). Cartesian Optics and the Geometrization of Nature. Review of Metaphysics 32 (2):253 - 273.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Lindley Darden & Nancy Maull (1977). Interfield Theories. Philosophy of Science 44 (1):43-64.
    This paper analyzes the generation and function of hitherto ignored or misrepresented interfield theories , theories which bridge two fields of science. Interfield theories are likely to be generated when two fields share an interest in explaining different aspects of the same phenomenon and when background knowledge already exists relating the two fields. The interfield theory functions to provide a solution to a characteristic type of theoretical problem: how are the relations between fields to be explained? In solving this problem (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Nancy L. Maull (1977). Unifying Science Without Reduction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 8 (2):143-162.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Nancy L. Maull (1976). Reconstructed Science as Philosophical Evidence. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:119 - 129.
    By using case studies from the history of science as evidence for its claims (and not, in contrast, merely to illustrate these claims), the philosophy of science can develop a more productive relation to its subject matter, the history of science. As might be expected, many problems involving the relation between theory and evidence in science reappear here as methodological problems about the relation between the philosophy of science and the history of science. For example, the most important of these (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation